Guest guest Posted May 25, 2010 Report Share Posted May 25, 2010 http://www.dovepress.com/getfile.php?fileID=6394 Below you will find the abstract, the introduction-, the discussion-session and for private members an attachment in pdf format of the original version of: Subset-directed antiviral treatment of 142 herpesvirus patients with CFS This article was published in the following Dove Press Journal: Virus Adaptation and Tretment, 24 May 2020 Number of times this article has been viewed, and download address for the full article, see: http://bit.ly/9WHyby Authors A Lerner1 Safedin Beqaj2 T Fitzgerald3 Ken Gill4 Carol Gill4 Edington4 1Department of Medicine, Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak; 2Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit; 3Department of Medical Education, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan; 4The Dr A Lerner Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Foundation, Beverly Hills, Michigan, USA Correspondence: A Lerner 32804 Pierce Road, Beverly Hills, MI 48025, USA Tel +1 Fax +1 Email amartinlerner@... ABSTRACT Purpose: We hypothesized that chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) may be caused by single or multiple Epstein–Barr virus (EBV), cytomegalovirus (HCMV), or human herpesvirus 6 (HHV6) infection. To determine if CFS life-altering fatigue and associated findings including muscle aches, tachycardia at rest, chest aches, left ventricular dysfunction, syncope, and elevated herpesvirus serum antibody titers are reversed by long-term subset-directed valacyclovir and/or valganciclovir. Patients and methods: Data were collected at physician visits every 4–6 weeks from 142 CFS patients at one clinic from 2001 to 2007. To be included in this study, patients had to be followed for at least six months. The data captured included over 7000 patient visits and over 35,000 fields of information. Severity of fatigue was monitored by a validated Energy Index Point Score® (EIPS®). Baseline and follow-up serum antibody titers to EBV, HCMV, and HHV6, as well as coinfections with Borrelia burgdorferi, Anaplasma phagocytophila, Babesia microti, and antistreptolysin O, 24-hour ECG Holter monitors, 2D echocardiograms, cardiac dynamic studies, symptoms, and toxicity were captured and monitored. International criteria for CFS plus a specifically designed CFS diagnostic panel were used. Results and conclusions: The Group A herpesvirus CFS patients (no coinfections) returned to a near-normal to normal life (P = 0.0001). The long-term EIPS value increased (primary endpoint, P , 0.0001) with subset-directed long-term valacyclovir and/or valganciclovir therapy. Secondary endpoints (cardiac, immunologic, and neurocognitive abnormalities) improved or disappeared. Group B CFS patients (herpesvirus plus coinfections) continued to have CFS. Keywords: valacyclovir, valganciclovir, treatment, chronic fatigue syndrome, CFS, Energy Index Point Score®, EIPS® ```` Introduction Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a life-altering illness affecting women to men in a ratio of 4:1,1–3 for which there is no evidence-based etiology or treatment.4–7 An association of CFS with an infectious gamma retrovirus XMRV, previously found in high-grade malignant prostate cancers, has been reported.8 This xenotropic virus is similar to Maloney murine leukemia and the sarcoma virus in rodent, feline, and primate species. XMRV possesses a slow mechanism for oncogenesis, and its course does not always lead to cancer.8,9 However, the XMRV report requires confirmation.10 Cardiac, immunologic, radiographic, and genetic abnormalities are present in CFS patients.11–21 We hypothesized that CFS is caused by Epstein–Barr virus (EBV), cytomegalovirus (HCMV), and human herpesvirus 6 (HHV6) in single or multiple virus infection.22 This suggests CFS patients continue EBV, HCMV, and HHV6 herpesvirus replication, and do not achieve the viral latency necessary for recovery.23–25 We propose that early and middle herpesvirus (EBV, HCMV, HHV6) gene products to about the fiftieth gene of these complex viruses, containing over 200 openreading frames, are synthesized without achieving complete virus formation.26 We now test this hypothesis with the nucleosides valacyclovir for a suspected EBV CFS subset and valganciclovir for suspected HCMV or HHV6 CFS subsets. We report long-term benefit, assessed by the validated severity of an illness metric, the Energy Index Point Score® (EIPS®).27 Seventy-nine of 106 (74.5%) CFS patients returned to a near-normal to normal life (primary endpoint). Secondary endpoints of cardiac, immunologic, and neurocognitive abnormalities improved or disappeared. The data support the paradigm that CFS illness is a herpesvirus infection. Group A CFS patients have EBV, HCMV, and HHV6 in single or multiple infection without coinfection. Group B CFS patients are similar to Group A, but with coinfections, tick-borne Borrelia burgdorferi, Babesia microti, Anaplasma phagocytophila, and/or adult rheumatic fever. Our research questions were whether subset-directed antiviral therapy to single and multiple herpesvirus CFS patient groups causes a significant change in EIPS; what percentages of groups A and B CFS patients have EBV, HCMV, and/or HHV6 infection; whether long-term valacyclovir (for EBV) and valganciclovir (for HCMV, HHV6) treatment can cause lasting improvement in EIPS values for CFS patients; if long-term valacyclovir and/or valganciclovir are free of deleterious effects to complete blood count (CBC), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and creatinine; whether single and coinfection CFS subsets respond similarly; and if there are identifiable demographics of Group A CFS patients who are " responders " and " nonresponders " to antiviral therapy? ``` Discussion We describe a CFS illness exemplifying a conflict between a complex system and attempts at reductionism.38 CFS illness is divided into Group A herpesvirus (EBV, HCMV, HHV6) without coinfection and Group B herpesvirus CFS with coinfection(s). Coinfections are, remarkably tick-borne Lyme disease, babesiosis and anaplasmosis, as well as non-tick-borne adult rheumatic fever. Long-term valacyclovir and/or valganciclovir subset-directed administration improved or eliminated CFS symptoms in Group A CFS patients, allowing them to return to normal life. EBV, HCMV, and HHV6 single and multiple herpesvirus Group A CFS patients were identified and responded equally well. Different patient populations in other CFS clinics may have varying percentages of these three herpesviruses. Valacyclovir and valganciclovir as administered here were safe. Single and multiple infected Group A CFS patients responded. An initial Jarisch-Herxheimer response at the start of antiviral medication initiates successful treatment. The higher the baseline EIPS, the better the prognosis. The long-term recovery of Group A CFS patients reported in this study is unprecedented. These remarkable results are dependent upon the careful diagnostic panel outlined here under Methods. We emphasize that the serologic antigens utilized for antibody assays of B. burgdorferi are identical to those used by the US Centers for Disease Control. It is unclear whether XMRV gamma retrovirus infection initiates the immunosuppression which may be responsible for CFS. Nevertheless, specific herpesvirus antiviral treatment reversed CFS illness in 79 of 106 Group A CFS patients. Earlier studies suggesting a herpesvirus CFS causation had not used either the diagnostic criteria or long-term herpesvirus therapy, nor had previous herpesvirus CFS research separated groups A and B CFS which is critical to these results.4,5 Cardiac muscle disease, syncope, chest pain, positive tilt table tests, tachycardias at rest, decreased left ventricular ejection fraction, and left ventricular dilatation improved and/ or disappeared with antiviral treatment. The abnormal HM is a reliable biomarker of CFS cardiac disease. The EIPS is integral to follow severity and reversal of CFS illness. Questions about the pathogenesis of CFS remain. There is a preponderance of tick-borne B. burgdorferi, and Anaplasma and Babesia coinfections in Group B CFS patients. Studies of possible antibiotics in patients with suspected chronic Lyme disease need to consider the possibility of an unrecognized presence of Group B herpesvirus CFS. Does herpesvirus CFS inhibit a class-switch transformation from IgM to IgG in B. burgdorferi infection? Elevated IgG HCMV titers with no IgM HCMV titers are common in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) patients, but AIDS patients have HCMV DNA in their blood by polymerase chain reaction. Does nonpermissive latent herpesvirus replication in CFS inhibit classic IgM/IgG class-switch interchange for the involved CFS herpesvirus? Meta-analysis of multiple randomized CFS therapeutic studies have determined a 17% placebo response.39 Graded exercise and psychotherapy alleviate some CFS symptoms,6,7 but neither therapy approaches the results of this report. The data here suggest exercise may be tolerated at EIPS > 7. A CFS patient (EIPS value > 5) with a posttreatment EIPS value of 6 lives a normal life with only a short midday nap. The present data are remarkable considering that these CFS patients had been ill for a mean of 4.8 years before antiviral therapy was begun. The mean duration of antiviral therapy for Group A CFS patients was 2.4 years. Both valacyclovir and valganciclovir were equally effective in single or multiple herpesvirus CFS subsets. In these CFS patients, herpesvirus antigenemia, viremia, and polymerase chain reactions in CFS tissues and bloods were negative.4,15 The CFS nonpermissive abortive herpesvirus paradigm postulates mRNA to middle or late EBV, HCMV, and HHV6 genes is present in the blood macrophages and lymphocytes of CFS patients. The presence of IgM serum antibodies to the nonstructural tegument middle-gene products HCMV p52 and HCMV CM2 in HCMV CFS is consistent with this hypothesis.24,25 CFS is a result of persistent single or multiple EBV, HCMV and/or HHV6 infections(s), categorized as a two-group complex illness without coinfection (Group A) or with coinfections (Group . These data show that 74.5% of 106 Group A CFS patients returned to near-normal to normal lives after long-term herpesvirus subset-directed antiviral therapy. Finally, the rationale for prolonged antiviral treatment requires discussion. This CFS herpesvirus paradigm is that herpesviruses (EBV, HCMV, HHV6) are constantly attempting to produce virulent complete virus as early, middle, and late gene product in progression, and, ultimately, cytopathic effects, and an inflammatory cytolysis of the affected cells. Progeny-complete herpesvirus then continues to infect new host cells. Similarly, the host-immune system attempts to inhibit herpesvirus replication and induce silent virus latency as intranuclear episomes with no viral gene products. In CFS, we hypothesize there is immediate-early gene and early gene expression, dysregulation of host cell functions, and cell cycle progression leading ultimately to noninflammatory apoptosis, such as that observed at cardiac biopsy.15 This proposed CFS process produces no viral DNA, no viral antigenemia, and no virion maturation.40 The CFS patient cannot successfully achieve herpesvirus latency. Valacyclovir (EBV) and valganciclovir (HCMV, HHV6) inhibit viral DNA polymerases. The long duration of antiviral therapy responds to the ongoing opposing forces, ie, virus induction-infected cellular destruction versus cellular survival by an effective immune response. We continue valacyclovir/valganciclovir until the EIPS is >7. If no further antiviral therapy is necessary, the CFS patient now independently maintains herpesvirus latency. The biologic parameters to be followed in this ongoing process are critical in our diagnostic panel and are described fully under Methods. These are EBV VCA, IgM (returns to negative), EBV, EA-D (decreases and returns to negative), HCMV IgM p52 and IgM CM2 (return to normal), and HM abnormalities (eg, T-waves normalize and tachycardias disappear). This thesis predicts that mRNA to intermediateearly herpesvirus genes is circulating in mononuclear cells in the blood of CFS patients, but this mRNA is not present in healthy subjects. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.