Re: Re: fire and smoke damage

[Guest guest]

,

You write: "So, even though this commercial business site is not referenced in that OSHA doc, and it shouldn't be, it actually references many of the same sources that the OSHA doc got it's information".

Why do you say i.) Caimian's site should not be a reference for OSHA but that ii.)he promotes the same info OSHA does? What are you basing those two concepts on?

Does his web site list this OSHA doc reference as a source of information? Reference #15 (see pdf page 26)

"15. WHO. 2009 WHO Guidelines for Indoor Air Quality – Dampness and Mold.http://katysexposure.wordpress.com/2009/07/19/2009-who-guidelines-for-indoor-air-quality-dampness-and-mold-2"

The OSHA advisory:

http://www.osha.gov/Publications/3430indoor-air-quality-sm.pdf

I could go down and rip Caihmoen's site for its interesting interpretations of other publications, but there is no need when OSHA is putting out quality work like they just did. Easier just to pull the highlights from the federal advisory doc so its easier for people to find, skim, and then read in detail if they so desire.

OSHA Issues Federal Advisory Regarding Poor Indoor Air Quality, Mold & Importance Of Building Maintenance | Katy's Exposure

Sharon