Guest guest Posted December 31, 2003 Report Share Posted December 31, 2003 I think we've got it! Thanks everyone! Kathy P.S. Is it a class, lecture, talk or presentation I am doing? Just kidding! > > > , > > > > > > I was hoping to hear from you! Thank you for your advice and > > support. I will > > > incorporate the concept into my talk-that won't be difficult! And > > practice saying > > > " fresh " instead of " raw " -that might be more of a challenge! > > > > > > Kathy > > @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ > > > > I definitely agree about the word " fresh " as an alternative to " raw " > > for new audiences. I would use the phrase " fresh, unprocessed " to > > draw attention to the larger issue of milk processing, with issues > > independent of heat treatment, like homogenization, fortification, > > reconstitution, etc. This more general concept of quality goes hand- > > in-hand with the issue of the animal's diet, pasturing, etc, and > > these are crucial issues that should appeal to most people's > > intuition and may be even more important than the heat treatment > > issue. After all, getting unfortified milk reduces to the same > > problem as getting unpasteurized milk,so these issues are mutually > > reinforcing at the practical level of a person's lifestyle choices. > > By placing rawness in this broader context and not singling it out, > > you can imply that it's a normal, natural thing, not a big deal. It > > also minimizes the risk of coming across as a single-minded > > countercultural fanatic. By using the word " raw " one foregrounds a > > binary opposition of raw/heated that requires special specification, > > a reaction to the negative of pasteurization, whereas " fresh " > > emphasizes the positive as a larger concept subsuming rawness. By > > expressing rawness as an inherent part of a general condition of > > freshness, one implies it's the normal, natural, default state of > > affairs and doesn't require special mention, This is related to the > > deep point that dirty/clean is a natural opposition, while > > dirty/pasteurized is not. Everybody knows fresh is good, and anyone > > who pursues the heat treatment topic with you individually can simply > > and casually be referred to Ron Schmid's book. I don't think many > > people respond well to passionate " sales pitches " , which give a > > feeling of tension, polarization, and controversy. (Maybe some kind > > of irony/complication in here since you're addressing a religious > > audience!!) Conversely, a confident and easy-mannered remark to the > > effect that unheated milk is healthier and there are doctors who > > recommend it their patients, followed by a single solid book > > recommendation, should convey the more appropriate feeling that > > they're simply in the dark about a potentially important topic and > > that the burden of being convinced can be taken upon themselves with > > the friendly support of a fellow community member. > > > > I think the deeper NT/WAP theme of traditional food culture and the > > absence of 20th century health epidemics in previous times is a > > better way to kindle interest in these matters, rather than diving > > into narrow topics like dairy, especially since dairy is far from > > being a universal food and could easily be dispensed with in favor of > > dozens of other food choices. For those with an inclination towards > > dairy, the more universal concept of quality (source, soil, nutrient- > > density, lack of harmful processing, use of helpful processing, > > ecological sustainability, freedom from toxins, etc) will lead > > directly and inevitably to our pet issues of dairy quality, including > > rawness. > > > > I would mention soil quality, proper feeding/raising of animals, the > > nutritional importance of animal foods, the universality > > of " dirty " /raw/fermented foods and their importance to our digestion, > > the problems of processed sugar/grains, etc. Dairy could be covered > > under the topic of fermented foods by mentioning the near- > > universality of fermented dairy in various forms among dairy- > > consuming cultures. This kind of broad, historical perspective was > > the most compelling part of the NT/WAP teachings when I was > > converting to this worldview. The simple statement that most foods > > eaten by members of your audience didn't exist before the 20th > > century has overwhelming import. > > > > Mike > > SE Pennsylvania > > > > To learn more about Raw Dairy, visit our home pages at http:// www.midvalleyvu.com > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.