Million dollar question on gaining muscle mass with bullworker.

[Guest guest]

I found an intresting link on ebay.

http://cgi.ebay.com/New-Bully-X-treme-Gym-By-Bullworker-Ent-w-5-yr-

Warranty_W0QQitemZ7235067912QQcategoryZ28067QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQ

cmdZViewItem

I appreciate this guy makes money by combining pete sisco's static

contraction training and importing bullwoker super 4 from India.

Here is my million-dollar question. Static contraction training

states to perform the isometric contraction in the strongest range

to involve maximum muscle fibers and by that stimulate the growth.

How do he apply this to bullworker training. For example chest press

(pressing bullworker by both handle in front your chest) angle is

not the strongest range my question is how he converts it. I gained

lot of lean muscle with isometrics alone without using weights. But

the problem is I have seen strength and muscle gains together only

when isometrics done in the strongest range. This is the area

bullworker should do some research on how to modify each exercise to

perform at its strongest range. It not that how many exercises can

be done with the bullworker but how many exercises effectively

stimulates muscle growth. Pete sisco has done that but his machine

explosive fitness price is beyond the reach for common man like me.

Bullworker works where Pete's principle is applied. If bullworker

improves in this I am definite most of the guys will move away from

weight training to bullworker.

[Guest guest]

I have this guys " training program " . I invested $20 and frankly, it

was really not worth it.

Candidly, there is no research that I have seen that convinces me

that the " strongest range " theory of isometrics actually will

produce superior strength gains or mass gains vis a vie more

traditional iso theory. Ditto Sisco's theory of static contraction,

where is this guys data?

In fact, it is a fairly well established iso principle that the most

complete muscle development comes from doing contractions at two to

three different angles of a joints movement. I have not seen this

theory contradicted by any serious researcher on strength.

My suggestion for those looking for greater mass vs strength

development is to read Dr Mel Siff's work on oscilating contraction

theory. This invovlves longer contraction holds with varing efforts

over the hold.

I think this guy selling the extreme bully is kind of a huckster,

hey he has my money!

Good stuff-

-- In bullworkerclub , " shravan kumar "

wrote:

>

> I found an intresting link on ebay.

>

> http://cgi.ebay.com/New-Bully-X-treme-Gym-By-Bullworker-Ent-w-5-yr-

>

Warranty_W0QQitemZ7235067912QQcategoryZ28067QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQ

> cmdZViewItem

>

> I appreciate this guy makes money by combining pete sisco's static

> contraction training and importing bullwoker super 4 from India.

> Here is my million-dollar question. Static contraction training

> states to perform the isometric contraction in the strongest range

> to involve maximum muscle fibers and by that stimulate the growth.

> How do he apply this to bullworker training. For example chest

press

> (pressing bullworker by both handle in front your chest) angle is

> not the strongest range my question is how he converts it. I

gained

> lot of lean muscle with isometrics alone without using weights.

But

> the problem is I have seen strength and muscle gains together only

> when isometrics done in the strongest range. This is the area

> bullworker should do some research on how to modify each exercise

to

> perform at its strongest range. It not that how many exercises can

> be done with the bullworker but how many exercises effectively

> stimulates muscle growth. Pete sisco has done that but his machine

> explosive fitness price is beyond the reach for common man like

me.

> Bullworker works where Pete's principle is applied. If bullworker

> improves in this I am definite most of the guys will move away

from

> weight training to bullworker.

>