Guest guest Posted February 5, 2002 Report Share Posted February 5, 2002 I would certainly be a lot easier if ALL the suppliers would use CORRECT ingredient names and declarations without the fluff, hyperbole and dishonesty. With the second, given that they haven't said what the vegetable oils are saponified with, I don't trust the declaration. Assuming that all the other ingredients are correct, however, it would be a true soap since there are no other detergents. If they had labelled correctly, the ingredient list would probably look pretty " chemically " too! There are any number of alkalis that " saponify " - who knows what they're using! Jules in Vancouver (who still thinks the Hall of Shame is not only appropriate but much needed!) > Hi all, > > I've been following the melt and pour soap base thread with alot of interest and need some > clarifications if possible.. > > Currently I am using the base from Wholesale Supplies Plus which has been discussed. Their > ingredient list is as follows: > > Ingredients: > Propylene Glycol (Comes from glycerol, a natural moisturizing material) > Water > Sodium Stearate (Natural fatty component to soap, vegetable base) > Glycerin (Humectant, naturally produced during soapmaking process) > Sodium Laureth Sulfate (Derived from Coconut Oil, natural cleansing agent) > Sorbitol (Found in ripe berries from mountain ash trees, adds creaminess) > Sodium Myristate (Foaming agent from vegetable fatty acids, natural organic acid) > Sodium Cocoyl Isethionate (Coconut oil base, Mild surfactant) > Triethanolamine (Emulsifier, made from vegetable fat) > Vitamin E > No Artificial Preservatives > > White base also has titanium dioxide > > > I have also used the melt and pour base from TKB trading, with their ingredient statement > being: > > " Best of all, it is a " Pure Soap " product, meaning that it contains a high percentage of > vegetable oil soap & is DETERGENT-FREE, ph is 8.5. > > Ingredients are: Saponified vegetable oils, vegetable glycerin, purified water, sorbital (a > natural humectant derived from fruits and berries), aloe vera (moisturizer) and propylene > glycol (emulsifier). " > > Comparing the 2 products it is easily visible that the first does contain more chemicals than > the second. But would the second base be considered " soap " according to FDA regulations or a > cosmetic? Is a true soap that which contains ONLY saponified oils (vegetable or animal), lye, > and water? For the sake of comparison I am not including the addition of things like fragrance > or essential oils.. If you were to add things like fresh fruits or goatsmilk to cold process > soaps does that change the soap classification in any way? > > I dont mean to be dense, I just dont totally understand the FDA wording and would like to be > sure of what statements I am making on my products... I find it very interesting and also very > frustrating every supplier I have found for melt and pour base promotes the products their > products in the same way. And then you have the select few which refuse to release their > ingredients list to you as it is proprietory and say that they are not required by law to do so > and that they are selling " soap " which does not require labeling... The word " natural " seems > to be misused in both of the above product descriptions and as such I am assuming that it is > totally incorrect for me to state that my melt and pour is in any way " natural " ? > > Thanks for all of your help in clearing up my confusion, it is greatly appreciated!! > > Take care, > Deb H. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 5, 2002 Report Share Posted February 5, 2002 > " Best of all, it is a " Pure Soap " product, meaning that it contains a high percentage of >vegetable oil soap & is DETERGENT-FREE, ph is 8.5. > >Ingredients are: Saponified vegetable oils, vegetable glycerin, purified water, sorbital (a >natural humectant derived from fruits and berries), aloe vera (moisturizer) and propylene >glycol (emulsifier). " This is not an inredient list that is suitable for personal care products. It's also not very informative. They don't mention the oils. Too bad. >Comparing the 2 products it is easily visible that the first does contain more chemicals than >the second.ÿ But would the second base be considered " soap " according to FDA regulations or a >cosmetic?ÿ Is a true soap that which contains ONLY saponified oils (vegetable or animal), lye, >and water?ÿ For the sake of comparison I am not including the addition of things like fragrance >or essential oils..ÿ If you were to add things like fresh fruits or goatsmilk to cold process >soaps does that change the soap classification in any way? Here's the FDA's definition of soap: 21 CFR Sec. 701.20 Detergent substances, other than soap, intended for use in cleansing the body. (a) In its definition of the term cosmetic, the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act specifically excludes soap. The term soap is nowhere defined in the act. In administering the act, the Food and Drug Administration interprets the term ``soap'' to apply only to articles that meet the following conditions: (1) The bulk of the nonvolatile matter in the product consists of an alkali salt of fatty acids and the detergent properties of the article are due to the alkali-fatty acid compounds; and (2) The product is labeled, sold, and represented only as soap. ( Products intended for cleansing the human body and which are not ``soap'' as set out in paragraph (a) of this section are ``cosmetics,'' and accordingly they are subject to the requirements of the act and the regulations thereunder. For example, such a product in bar form is subject to the requirement, among others, that it shall bear a label containing an accurate statement of the weight of the bar in avoirdupois pounds and ounces, this statement to be prominently and conspicuously displayed so as to be likely to be read under the customary conditions of purchase and use. Ask the vendor if their soap base complies with the FDA's soap definition. Or better yet, ask him what portion of the nonvolatile matter is saponified oils? If he tells you that the non-volatile portion of the soap base is composed of 51% saponified oils, you would meet the soap definition for this product. But you wouldn't have much room to add those fancy extras. If you add more solids, you be reducing the relative percentage of saponified oils. If the non-volatile portion of the soap base is composed of 61% saponified oils, then you have more room to play. >I dont mean to be dense, I just dont totally understand the FDA wording and would like to be >sure of what statements I am making on my products...ÿ I find it very interesting and also very >frustrating every supplier I have found for melt and pour base promotes the products their >products in the same way. And then you have the select few which refuse to release their >ingredients list to you as it is proprietory and say that they are not required by law to do so >and that they are selling " soap " which does not require labeling... If, in fact, their soap base meets the FDA's definition, they are exempt. These vendors must be pretty independent to have an attitude like that. > The word " natural " seems >to be misused in both of the above product descriptions and as such I am assuming that it is >totally incorrect for me to state that my melt and pour is in any way " natural " ? The two M & P soaps described are not 100% natural or naturally derived. Maurice ------------------------ Maurice O. Hevey Convergent Cosmetics, Inc. http://www.ConvergentCosmetics.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 6, 2002 Report Share Posted February 6, 2002 Deb, Ask them for the ingredient list in INCI names as per FDA requirement and see what answer you get. I am always very suspicious of vendors who will not provide documentation with a smile and some amount of speed. This vendor is the one who states " Logwood is an FDA approved colorant " . They stop short of saying for soap so they are not exactly lying, but they do not mention that it is only approved for removable surgical sutures on the FDA site. To me that is close enough to a lie to prevent my buying from them again. Esp. since the Logwood is noted as poisonous on many sites that give info on plants. Dee <(((>< <<<I have also used the melt and pour base from TKB trading, with their ingredient statement being: " Best of all, it is a " Pure Soap " product, meaning that it contains a high percentage of vegetable oil soap & is DETERGENT-FREE, ph is 8.5. Ingredients are: Saponified vegetable oils, vegetable glycerin, purified water, sorbital (a natural humectant derived from fruits and berries), aloe vera (moisturizer) and propylene glycol (emulsifier). " > > Take care, > Deb H.>>>>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.