Guest guest Posted December 29, 2006 Report Share Posted December 29, 2006 > > Well, as always, what we " need " is based on > what we hav defined as our objectives from a > CV training program. > > A 55 yr old guy, post cardiac patient or a > risk for Heart Disease might well be killed > by a interval training program, ie the Tabata > protocol. For that guy, a 40 minute walk > around the block is likely in order. I didn't know of the Tabata protocol until today, and I read up on it from web searches. And indeed, it can sound brutal. But I think even a cardiac patient can modify it to suit his situation. The first week of the Sears program is just one 6-minute exertion period, which is even a lot less than a 40-minute walk. It allows for just walking, if that's all one can do to reach near max. Subsequent weeks have decreasing exertion periods: 3 minutes, then 2 minutes, and finally 1 minute by the fourth week. The intensity of the exertion, however, increases, and one does several more " sets " on subsequent weeks, until one is doing 3 sets by the fourth week. It does not even approach the Tabata protocol of 20-sec exertion and 10-sec recovery intervals. I think the point of the Sears program, and other interval training protocols, is to reach near maximum capacity. If rising up from a chair accomplishes this, then such patient can just start with that. > For the 20 yr old track athlete who is running > sprints for an event, the interval training > protocol is the ONLY way he will get faster. > > A Marathon runner, well you get the point. True. However, I think the point of the Sears program is not whether one runs marathons or sprints, but whether one's cardiovascular fitness improves. I think we've all heard of stories of people dying of heart attacks even if they followed aerobics religiously. Of course other people die of heart attacks who don't do aerobics, but the point is that aerobics is appearing to be useless as far as prevention of heart attacks goes. Whether interval training will be better, I still have to find out. (And now that I think about it, did anyone ever die of a heart attack in sprints? I know several did in marathons, and these were people who trained for marathons.) And even marathon runners don't run marathons for their training. I think I read somewhere that to train for a certain distance, one only needs to train one-fifth or one-fourth of that distance. Maybe they would do better with an interval type protocol? > BTW-Not everything Dr Al Sears says is > necessarily correct nor wise. > > Same is true for most " experts, " Definitely. But as far as cardio fitness goes, my own experience proves the effectivity of interval training, far surpassing aerobics. I commute by bicycle, and lately, I was thinking just to coast along when I could. Anyway, there was always that uphill climb to provide me the exercise. The result was I found myself getting weaker and weaker -- that uphill climb got more and more difficult. I remember that I could even climb that with my 6-year old kid sitting on the horizontal bar of the frame a couple of decades ago. But now I found myself huffing with difficulty with barely a kg load. And this in spite of the aerobic nature of my coasting along in my commutes. I did a variation of the Sears program. I ignored the warm up sessions (well, I was on my bike), and in a section of my commute which had a very slight upward slope I would max out with a sprint for about a minute or so. This gave me a recovery period before the uphill climb came along. So in effect, I jumped to his 3rd week level, but with only 2 sets. In a couple of weeks, that uphill was a lot easier for me -- a first in several years! I'm still not up to my level before when I could carry a kid up that slope (besides, they're all grown up now), but I now see that I have an easy way of getting there. Again, the point is, until I went for maximum capacity, my cardio fitness was going downhill. Only when I went for max did it start to improve. And this is definitely anaerobic. The aerobics of my daily commute did me no good. Just my experience. Gerry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 1, 2007 Report Share Posted January 1, 2007 > > In my post last November (message no. 3057), > I described my use of the Tabata method applied > to an x5 bullworker. This works well for me and, > as you say it can be brutal, but it can be > adjusted to suit your ability. Thanks for the info. I went to read your post and I question the concern of doctors prohibiting isometric exercises because of the effect on blood pressure. Do you know if this has ever been proven? I lost my finger pressure monitor, but when I had it, I found my 140-180/100-120 BP would quickly normalize after 20 reps of barbell squats, which is something the doctors would not want me to do. Too bad, I never tried it to see what happens with isometrics. I've been " hypertensive " for more than a decade now, but never took any medications. If I wanted a normal BP, I would simply fast for a day. Seems to me that BP is related to blood sugar levels, and exercise, including isometrics, is a sure way to normalize BP. Gerry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2007 Report Share Posted January 2, 2007 Any exercise will increase BP temporaily. But it goes back to normal after you stop exercising.Isometrics is no different. Overtime, if you have high BP, exercising regularly and a healthy diet can normalize it. Walking is especially good for this. However, if you have high BP, it is best to discuss exercising with your doctor before you start, just to be safe. Richknuj_gse wrote: >> In my post last November (message no. 3057),> I described my use of the Tabata method applied> to an x5 bullworker. This works well for me and, > as you say it can be brutal, but it can be> adjusted to suit your ability. Thanks for the info. I went to read your post andI question the concern of doctors prohibiting isometric exercises because of the effect on blood pressure. Do you know if this has ever beenproven?I lost my finger pressure monitor, but when I hadit, I found my 140-180/100-120 BP would quicklynormalize after 20 reps of barbell squats, whichis something the doctors would not want me to do.Too bad, I never tried it to see what happens withisometrics.I've been "hypertensive" for more than a decade now, but never took any medications. If I wanteda normal BP, I would simply fast for a day. Seemsto me that BP is related to blood sugar levels,and exercise, including isometrics, is a sure wayto normalize BP.Gerry __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.