Guest guest Posted December 21, 2004 Report Share Posted December 21, 2004 > Dear , > > >> Thoughts arising inside: > >> > >>>> M: turn the statements about me in your post around and you will > >>>> see how you think about yourself. > >> *I* *don't* *care* to see how I think about myself - my thoughts: my > >> buisness. > > Yes, I hear that you don´t care about yourself. > Yes. And that's not what I said. > And you want to take away from me the opportunity of finding it out > myself? I don´t wan´t to take away anything from you. I am too busy living my life right now to even have a thought of taking things away from you. Never said I wanted to either. > > ... > > Let me tell you how the worked has worked for me. The turnarounds is > > coming more and > > more automatically for me now a days. So when I tell someone to turn > > something around, I am already there doing it formyself. Well, who > > was I talking to in the first place *lol*? And I couldn´t find one > > thing that upseted me or was stressful to me here. Only love. > Well, that's sweet for you. > > ... > >>>>> This quote - " of course I 'excuse' you for not looking at your > >>>>> concepts. " > >>>>> > >>>>> What is that? > >>>>> > >>>> M: You asked me to please excuse you for backing off and clinging > >>>> to > >>>> your happy story. The quotation mark is my way of saying that there > >>>> is nothing to excuse, but of course I respect your wish to not take > >>>> my invitation but cling to your stories. > >> 'you respect my wish' - how generous of you! > >> As if you had a choice! > > , there are no choices. Either we do or we don´t, and then > > we tell ourselfs stories about why. It has nothing with generousity to > > do. > Yes. And that's what I said. > > ... > >> *** > >> and Jan should not act so " spiritual " . > >> - So... is it true? Do they? > >> Yes! On, and on, and on... > >> - And how do we know that's exactly what they *should* do? > >> Yes, I know: Because they are doing it. It is what is. It's their job. > >> How many more times do I have to see it to get it? > >> - And how do you react when you think that thought, while you are > >> reading their mails? How do you treat them - even in your mind? > >> I distance myself... I see them as *blind* to 'what is'. As ignorant. > >> As 'know-it-all's. I laugh at them. I feel superior, more enlightened! > >> - and how does that feel? > >> Not good. My stomach contracts. Feels like being a 'know-it- all' > >> myself. > >> - can you see a reason to drop that thought? > >> certainly. Less pressure, less opposing. > >> - can you see a reason to keep it, that isn't stressful? > >> No. Not one. > >> - who would you be if you could not think that thought again, reading > >> their mails? > >> a peaceful one. Welcoming their thoughts, instead of opposing them. > >> Seeing their dance. > >> Much better. > >> - so, ' and Jan should not act so " spiritual " '. Turn it around. > >> and Jan should act so " spiritual " . - yes, that is what is, > >> anyway, according to my perception. > >> I should not act so " spiritual " . - sure, like when *I* know the better > >> path for both of them > >> *** > >> > >> feel less stressed already. > >> > >> Thanks for outlining, > >> > > > > Thanks for a great work , > You're welcome. > > > in fact it could had been my work on you a while back. > So, you are more 'evolved', now? ;-) Don´t understand the question. > > > Now I mostly just find your posts too uninteresting to read. > Oh, how " nice " of you to say that! From your quotation mark I take it as you don´t think it was nice of me to say that. Well, your story of " nice " , what ever it means is yours - keep it, for all I care. I wasn´t trying to be nice, nor was I trying to be mean. This is just what is. I went from being annoyed by your " spiritual tone " to just simply having no interest anymore. > And fascinating how you can reply without reading them! I usually don´t reply to your posts since I find MOST of them boring, this one cought my attention though. > > > And last but not least, a quote from > > O´ I think says it all: " We are spirituals trying to be human, > > not human trying to be spirituals. " > Nice story. > > > Happy holidays, > what holidays? In Sweden we have Christmas and New Year here soon. I thought you called it holiday in English. If not - my mistake. > And thank you. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.