Re: Re: what is

[Guest guest]

Dear Lynn,

as you see I am quite " behind " in posts! ;-)

>> being happy = " Loving What Is " .

>

> Certainly " sounds " good . But really that's so general. You can

> love murder, rape and war and loss? Can you also love " what isn't " ?

> Without the physical side of things - makes it easier to " love " . But

> usually when the physical is introduced things like " sensations "

> sometimes take over. Can be a true test, for sure.

'what is' for me may be different from 'what is' for you at this moment.

'what is' is reality as I see it. 'That' should be different is arguing

with what is. 'Murder', 'rape', 'war' and 'loss' are labels we put on

'what is'. And we may not perceive them as labels in the moment, but as

'what is'. And that's the only reality one can look at. At the moment.

> Don't get me wrong - its a duality type of dimension we seem to live

> in. There's the considerations of love/hate, beauty/ ugly, etc. and

> on and on - and being able to love it all - or what " is " , would be

> either someone " spectating " and having a meditation moment or someone

> who truly is most of the time, in the higher vibratory wavelengths of

> emotional levels, a rarety in my opinion.

about the 'love/hate' considerations:

aren't 'beauty', 'love', 'freedom' labels we put on 'what is' when we

experience a peaceful state of mind? Words we use to express that there

is nothing to change?

And aren't " negative " labels like 'hate', 'ugly', 'war' for us to

express that we want something to change?

My experience is that when I get to love what I call 'ugly', my

perception of this uglyness fades away, and I call it no longer 'ugly'.

As long as I see it as 'war', 'rape', 'ugly', 'loss', 'hate' it may be

a spiritual attitude to love it.

But when the love comes from deep of my heart, all the " negative "

labels make no sense any more. And I can still see how someone else

would see it as less than perfection.

But what 'doing' is there other than perfection, when I don't label it?

Or what 'feeling', for that matter? Feeling may be a doing I don't

control, yet.

>> Your clarification was as follows:

>>> " Being in harmony and prioritizing within myself. I'm just as

>>> complex as anyone else, so the best thing for me is to

>>> prioritize and know where I want to be headed and what I want

>>> out of life, etc. It doesn't help if I'm at war or conflict

>>> within myself. In getting with that harmony, then its easier to

>>> choose the type of people to be with in whatever areas I want at

>>> the time. These people will more or less agree with my basic

>>> concepts which makes it easier to " play " and have some fun, plus

>>> get some things done in my life as well. "

>> It sounds like you believe that you and I are complex? I used to

>> believe that but now I understand that it is merely my uninvestigated

>> thoughts that can appear to be complex and I simply want to be

>>

>> happy.

>>

>> Best of luck with your efforts to " prioritize and know where I want

>> to be headed and what I want out of life, etc. " and being able

>>

>> to " choose the type of people to be with in whatever areas I

>> want at

>> the time " .

>

> And best of luck to you as well with Loving What Is (especially on

> planet Earth)

>

> Warmth,

> Lyn

Love,