Guest guest Posted November 13, 2004 Report Share Posted November 13, 2004 > > Hi! > > I got the book after all, and have read the first 30 pages of it. > First I felt anger - do I have to undestand her again?! I have tried > to understand her all my life, I am so tired of that, but I do see > that it is a must if I want to get ahead with all of this for myself. > Hi BM, I think KO's should be very careful when attempting to understand nadas. It is easy to start feeling sorry for them, feel responsible for them, and nadas will pick up on that and hoover away. I think once we have distanced ourselves and gained tremendous inner strength and stability we are more able to have some compassion and understanding. I have found that it doesn't really matter WHY they are toxic, they are toxic. It's like staring at a venomous snake and wondering why it will kill me; is it so important to understand the snake or save myself? I will never understand bp behavior completely and it isn't my job to understand and have compassion for abusive people, that is THEIR job! I have said it many times, I don't care for SWOE because it seems to be more about learning to tolerate bp's bullshit than taking back your life. I know their are good parts in it, but it seems to be for people who want to stay with a bp person at any cost and how to do that. Taking back my life (as the title of SWOE states) for me, meant running for my life (literally) in the opposite direction of nada. Be careful when feeling compassion for a nada, THAT is dangerous territory and enforces the very brainwashing beliefs that we need to undo: that poor nada is misunderstood.... Poor nada will eat you for dinner........take care, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 13, 2004 Report Share Posted November 13, 2004 > Hi and All, > > SWOE wasn't written just for us KOs. SWOE was written about > *high-functioning* BPs who are/were in a *chosen* relationship with a > BP. We KOs are/were in an *unchosen* relationship and the nadas of those > on this list are mostly *low-functioning*. I think that non bps who are in " chosen " relationships can be as brainwashed as KO's and they can be just as stuck, emotionally and mentally, as a child. They may have the money to walk out the door and are old enough to do so, but they can be just as lost in the FOG as children. Also, I am not sure the high functioning bp's are less toxic than low functioning, maybe they just hide it better to the world, but for the non's living with them, it is just as bad. (?) (dunno, I think my nada was considered high functioning AND highly toxic) I think SWOE is a book that could help me NOW that I broke through all of the brainwashing and ended contact and can see all of it clearly, (and nada is dead) but in the beginning it is so easy to fall prey to pity and a sense of responsibility for the bp and that is where SWOE, imo, can be dangerous. In the beginning we NEED to be angry and swing to the other side of the nada pendulum for a while and give voice to all the rage and injustices we lived through and there is no room for nada and her illness on that side. That is OUR time and in that place it doesn't matter why nada is sick or even that she is sick, it only matters that we give attention and care to ourselves. That is why I get a little frustrated when new people read SWOE and many seem to have the same reaction, guilt and anger, because while SWOE has good points, overall it asks us to understand the person abusing us. Further, there are a couple parts that seem to ask the non to caretake the bp's feelings through interpreting the bp's abusive statements and rephrase them into what the bp " really meant " and that seems like co-dependency and enabling to me. Just my opinion, and even though I don't agree with all of SWOE, I have tremendous respect for Randi and you and all the moderators for promoting awareness of bpd, your committment to the cause and the free support offered here. Take care, > > The parts of SWOE that are applicable to KOs are parts of Sections 1 and > 2, and chapter 11. > - Section 1 is about Understanding BPD Behavior: the BP's inner world, > making sense out of the chaos, and how BP's behavior affects Nons (and KOs). > - Section 2 is about Taking Back Control of Your Life (which we KOs > never had in the first place) by making changes in ourself, setting > boundaries, and asserting our needs. This protects us KOs against future > interactions with other ppl with personality disorders. > - Chapter 11 is about distortion campaigns, which our nadas do to us KOs > when we are no longer controllable by them. For me, the compassion stuff > came later (after my BPD/NPD nada and hubby were dead) and could no > longer hurt me. > > > Be careful when feeling compassion for a nada, THAT is dangerous > > territory and enforces the very brainwashing beliefs that we need to > > undo: that poor nada is misunderstood.... Poor nada will eat you for > > dinner........take care, > > Yes, is right. Our nadas have all feasted on us KOs. They were > supposed to love us but instead they did the only thing they knew how - > that is, eat us as a McKO meal. > > - Edith Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 13, 2004 Report Share Posted November 13, 2004 > > > Hi and All, > > > > SWOE wasn't written just for us KOs. SWOE was written about > > *high-functioning* BPs who are/were in a *chosen* relationship > with a > > BP. We KOs are/were in an *unchosen* relationship and the nadas of > those > > on this list are mostly *low-functioning*. > > I think that non bps who are in " chosen " relationships can be as > brainwashed as KO's and they can be just as stuck, emotionally and > mentally, as a child. They may have the money to walk out the door > and are old enough to do so, but they can be just as lost in the FOG > as children. Also, I am not sure the high functioning bp's are less > toxic than low functioning, maybe they just hide it better to the > world, but for the non's living with them, it is just as bad. (?) > (dunno, I think my nada was considered high functioning AND highly > toxic) ******Me too, nada was HF and definitly toxic. Ironically when I told her I needed a bit of space and not to contact me until I contacted her she said " I'm not a toxic person, why are you treating me like this. " FOG. Ya, the hard thing about a HF nada is it can be even harder to tell if it's you or her because your gut knows she's being crazy, but the rest of the world may only see her " public face. " I know one of my friend's thought I was just a complaining princess until her car overheated near my house and when I came with water to help her, nada came out of the house and yelled at me that I needed to come inside and clean the bathroom. I tried to explain that I needed to help my friend with her car first, but she would not take no for an answer! > > I think SWOE is a book that could help me NOW that I broke through > all of the brainwashing and ended contact and can see all of it > clearly, (and nada is dead) but in the beginning it is so easy to > fall prey to pity and a sense of responsibility for the bp and that > is where SWOE, imo, can be dangerous. > > In the beginning we NEED to be angry and swing to the other side of > the nada pendulum for a while and give voice to all the rage and > injustices we lived through and there is no room for nada and her > illness on that side. That is OUR time and in that place it doesn't > matter why nada is sick or even that she is sick, it only matters > that we give attention and care to ourselves. *****This is so true, I am in this angry, withdrawn from nada stage right now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.