Guest guest Posted July 5, 2008 Report Share Posted July 5, 2008 Ann, This is not Carol but no the DSRTF is run by Patti White O'Brien (a mom). Mobley and Garner are scientists who are a couple of the recipients of the fund raising. DSRTF has almost exclusively supported Stanford wth the one exception of Reeves at s Hopkins. Garner would like to do a clinical trial w/ people to have a proof of concept. The concept to prove is that individuals w/ DS can have significant cognitive improvement through treatment with medicine. DSRTF has not shown an interest in moving toward clinical trials, yet. I hope they will be interested in supporting this. It may be up to Changing Minds Foundation, the fundraising that Garner is doing on his own and Stanford's fundraising office. It is very preliminary and probably should not have been brought up yet. But maybe it is better it has. In a few weeks, I should have an estimate of costs. How many participants and what they decide to use. It is very, very, very exciting.Things are moving fairly quickly. I'll keep everyone posted as things develop, Subject: [DownSyndromeInfoExchange] Re: Fw: DS Clinical Trials- From Dr Craig GarnerTo: DownSyndromeInfoExchange Date: Saturday, July 5, 2008, 1:17 PM Carol,I saw in the other post that "Dr. Mobley has been put on the shelf" is this true? Is the foundation run by Garner now?We just met Mobley at a fundraiser and I was impressed. I wonder how we can raise money for this research, is it the same foundation DSRTF?Thanks,Ann>> I wrote to Dr. Garner and asked if he could please tell us about the clinical trials, research and prozac and he was kind enough to reply and allow us to post this to the list!!!> > I think it's fantastic that he took the time to keep us all informed!> > > > Carol in IL > > AIM doihavtasay1 GigaTribe doihavtasay> Mom to seven including , 7 with TOF, AVcanal, GERD, LS, Asthma, subglottal stenosis, and DS.> > My problem is not how I look. It's how you see me.> > > Join our Down Syndrome information group - > http://health. groups.yahoo. com/group/ DownSyndromeInfo Exchange/> > Listen to oldest dd's music http://www.myspace. com/vennamusic> > > > ----- Forwarded Message ----> From: Craig C. Garner <cgarner@... >> To: Carol in IL <ps1272000@. ..>; and Tim Cashion > Cc: Kathy Ratkiewicz <Kathy_R@... >> Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2008 8:59:00 PM> Subject: DS Clinical Trials> > > Hi Carol and Kathy,> > Thank you for your email. I hope I can clarify questions and concerns from your online community. > > First, I want to reiterate that I cannot advise any therapy for individuals with Down syndrome until they have been shown to be safe and effective in an approved study. Of course we are hopeful that therapies will be proven safe and effective as soon as possible, but for legal reasons we have to leave official advice to doctors and the FDA.> > Concerning a clinical trial we are most certainly not at a standstill. In fact, my efforts to start a trial require daily effort. We are aware of Cody's project, and we are inspired by the potential that our laboratory finding will transfer to the clinic. We are working to make a clinical trial a reality quickly -- a matter of months not years. Our team includes physicians, psychiatrists, neurologists, and scientists at Stanford and elsewhere who share my hope and are working with us to find the best possible drug formulation that can be used safely and effectively in individuals with Down syndrome. > > As you can imagine, there are many administrative, organizational, and financial hurdles. Our biggest challenge is fundraising. Unfortunately, drug companies consider the risks too great and the potential payoff too small to fund a trial at this early stage, so we are working to raise funds through philanthropy. We have estimated the costs of a trial, and the required funds are manageable, but we will need help from your community -- and beyond -- to raise these funds.> > Many of the details of the trial are still being worked out at this time. We have many options for drug treatment strategies under consideration. With regard to Prozac, a decision has not been made whether it will be included in the first trial. When our plans and protocol are finalized, we will certainly distribute those details to you and your community. Sadly, due to our many time commitments, we cannot update our websites as frequently as we would like. However, we are in the midst of a site redesign that we hope will greatly increase the rate of new content, including information on any trials. > > Best,> > Craig> > Craig C. Garner, Ph.D.> Professor of Psychiatry> & Behavioral Sciences > Pritzker Laboratory> 1201 Welch Road, Room P106> Stanford, CA 94305-5485> > cgarner@...> http://cgarnerlab. stanford. edu> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 Hi Ann, Dr Mobley is far from being put on the shelf. :-) He is very actively researching! There is more than one issue to research and in the researcher's eyes, Prozac has not been proven to be *the* answer to growing new brain cells. Even Dr Garner is not sure that Prozac will be one of the drugs in the trial at this point. Terese is very passionate about Prozac, but it's not the only game in town. We would like to get more researchers or people in the know on this list to be able to give a broader view of the research going on- we are working on that. In the meantime, you are free to contact DSTRF and ask any question. I am assuming Dr Garner will apply to DSTRF for a grant. DSTRF has an advisory board that reviews all grants in an effort to be responsible with the money and to choose those studies they feel will yield the biggest bang for our buck. Right now the clinical trials are in the very early stages!!! VERY EARLY.... as Dr Garner pointed out, not even sure prozac will be included. But before he can apply for a grant from DSTRF, the study has to be all written up and ready to go.... same is true I am sure for any other grant applications. )Bottom line though, as always, want DSTRF to be able to fund clinical trials? Send them money!! :-) It was their research funds that got this whole ball rolling in the first place!If we continue to concentrate our funds into one large group that will choose who to give grants to based on their extensive knowledge, we can do a lot more then just sending money off betting blind on who ever seems to look good to *us*, with very limited information as to the research going on.. So if Garner himself isn't totally sold on the idea of prozac and it's not a slam dunk for the clinical, that alone should tell you something. Carol in IL AIM doihavtasay1 GigaTribe doihavtasayMom to seven including , 7 with TOF, AVcanal, GERD, LS, Asthma, subglottal stenosis, and DS.My problem is not how I look. It's how you see me. Join our Down Syndrome information group - http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/DownSyndromeInfoExchange/ Listen to oldest dd's music http://www.myspace.com/vennamusic----- Original Message ----To: DownSyndromeInfoExchange Sent: Saturday, July 5, 2008 8:17:07 AMSubject: [DownSyndromeInfoExchange] Re: Fw: DS Clinical Trials- From Dr Craig GarnerCarol, I saw in the other post that "Dr. Mobley has been put on the shelf" is this true? Is the foundation run by Garner now? We just met Mobley at a fundraiser and I was impressed. I wonder how we can raise money for this research, is it the same foundation DSRTF? Thanks, Ann > > I wrote to Dr. Garner and asked if he could please tell us about the clinical trials, research and prozac and he was kind enough to reply and allow us to post this to the list!!! > > I think it's fantastic that he took the time to keep us all informed! > > > > Carol in IL > > AIM doihavtasay1 GigaTribe doihavtasay > Mom to seven including , 7 with TOF, AVcanal, GERD, LS, Asthma, subglottal stenosis, and DS. > > My problem is not how I look. It's how you see me. > > > Join our Down Syndrome information group - > http://health. groups.yahoo. com/group/ DownSyndromeInfo Exchange/ > > Listen to oldest dd's music http://www.myspace. com/vennamusic > > > > ----- Forwarded Message ---- > From: Craig C. Garner <cgarner@... > > To: Carol in IL <ps1272000@. ..>; and Tim Cashion > Cc: Kathy Ratkiewicz <Kathy_R@... > > Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2008 8:59:00 PM > Subject: DS Clinical Trials > > > Hi Carol and Kathy, > > Thank you for your email. I hope I can clarify questions and concerns from your online community. > > First, I want to reiterate that I cannot advise any therapy for individuals with Down syndrome until they have been shown to be safe and effective in an approved study. Of course we are hopeful that therapies will be proven safe and effective as soon as possible, but for legal reasons we have to leave official advice to doctors and the FDA. > > Concerning a clinical trial we are most certainly not at a standstill. In fact, my efforts to start a trial require daily effort. We are aware of Cody's project, and we are inspired by the potential that our laboratory finding will transfer to the clinic. We are working to make a clinical trial a reality quickly -- a matter of months not years. Our team includes physicians, psychiatrists, neurologists, and scientists at Stanford and elsewhere who share my hope and are working with us to find the best possible drug formulation that can be used safely and effectively in individuals with Down syndrome. > > As you can imagine, there are many administrative, organizational, and financial hurdles. Our biggest challenge is fundraising. Unfortunately, drug companies consider the risks too great and the potential payoff too small to fund a trial at this early stage, so we are working to raise funds through philanthropy. We have estimated the costs of a trial, and the required funds are manageable, but we will need help from your community -- and beyond -- to raise these funds. > > Many of the details of the trial are still being worked out at this time. We have many options for drug treatment strategies under consideration. With regard to Prozac, a decision has not been made whether it will be included in the first trial. When our plans and protocol are finalized, we will certainly distribute those details to you and your community. Sadly, due to our many time commitments, we cannot update our websites as frequently as we would like. However, we are in the midst of a site redesign that we hope will greatly increase the rate of new content, including information on any trials. > > Best, > > Craig > > Craig C. Garner, Ph.D. > Professor of Psychiatry > & Behavioral Sciences > Pritzker Laboratory > 1201 Welch Road, Room P106 > Stanford, CA 94305-5485 > > cgarner@... > http://cgarnerlab. stanford. edu > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 Hi Ann, Dr Mobley is far from being put on the shelf. :-) He is very actively researching! There is more than one issue to research and in the researcher's eyes, Prozac has not been proven to be *the* answer to growing new brain cells. Even Dr Garner is not sure that Prozac will be one of the drugs in the trial at this point. Terese is very passionate about Prozac, but it's not the only game in town. We would like to get more researchers or people in the know on this list to be able to give a broader view of the research going on- we are working on that. In the meantime, you are free to contact DSTRF and ask any question. I am assuming Dr Garner will apply to DSTRF for a grant. DSTRF has an advisory board that reviews all grants in an effort to be responsible with the money and to choose those studies they feel will yield the biggest bang for our buck. Right now the clinical trials are in the very early stages!!! VERY EARLY.... as Dr Garner pointed out, not even sure prozac will be included. But before he can apply for a grant from DSTRF, the study has to be all written up and ready to go.... same is true I am sure for any other grant applications. )Bottom line though, as always, want DSTRF to be able to fund clinical trials? Send them money!! :-) It was their research funds that got this whole ball rolling in the first place!If we continue to concentrate our funds into one large group that will choose who to give grants to based on their extensive knowledge, we can do a lot more then just sending money off betting blind on who ever seems to look good to *us*, with very limited information as to the research going on.. So if Garner himself isn't totally sold on the idea of prozac and it's not a slam dunk for the clinical, that alone should tell you something. Carol in IL AIM doihavtasay1 GigaTribe doihavtasayMom to seven including , 7 with TOF, AVcanal, GERD, LS, Asthma, subglottal stenosis, and DS.My problem is not how I look. It's how you see me. Join our Down Syndrome information group - http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/DownSyndromeInfoExchange/ Listen to oldest dd's music http://www.myspace.com/vennamusic----- Original Message ----To: DownSyndromeInfoExchange Sent: Saturday, July 5, 2008 8:17:07 AMSubject: [DownSyndromeInfoExchange] Re: Fw: DS Clinical Trials- From Dr Craig GarnerCarol, I saw in the other post that "Dr. Mobley has been put on the shelf" is this true? Is the foundation run by Garner now? We just met Mobley at a fundraiser and I was impressed. I wonder how we can raise money for this research, is it the same foundation DSRTF? Thanks, Ann > > I wrote to Dr. Garner and asked if he could please tell us about the clinical trials, research and prozac and he was kind enough to reply and allow us to post this to the list!!! > > I think it's fantastic that he took the time to keep us all informed! > > > > Carol in IL > > AIM doihavtasay1 GigaTribe doihavtasay > Mom to seven including , 7 with TOF, AVcanal, GERD, LS, Asthma, subglottal stenosis, and DS. > > My problem is not how I look. It's how you see me. > > > Join our Down Syndrome information group - > http://health. groups.yahoo. com/group/ DownSyndromeInfo Exchange/ > > Listen to oldest dd's music http://www.myspace. com/vennamusic > > > > ----- Forwarded Message ---- > From: Craig C. Garner <cgarner@... > > To: Carol in IL <ps1272000@. ..>; and Tim Cashion > Cc: Kathy Ratkiewicz <Kathy_R@... > > Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2008 8:59:00 PM > Subject: DS Clinical Trials > > > Hi Carol and Kathy, > > Thank you for your email. I hope I can clarify questions and concerns from your online community. > > First, I want to reiterate that I cannot advise any therapy for individuals with Down syndrome until they have been shown to be safe and effective in an approved study. Of course we are hopeful that therapies will be proven safe and effective as soon as possible, but for legal reasons we have to leave official advice to doctors and the FDA. > > Concerning a clinical trial we are most certainly not at a standstill. In fact, my efforts to start a trial require daily effort. We are aware of Cody's project, and we are inspired by the potential that our laboratory finding will transfer to the clinic. We are working to make a clinical trial a reality quickly -- a matter of months not years. Our team includes physicians, psychiatrists, neurologists, and scientists at Stanford and elsewhere who share my hope and are working with us to find the best possible drug formulation that can be used safely and effectively in individuals with Down syndrome. > > As you can imagine, there are many administrative, organizational, and financial hurdles. Our biggest challenge is fundraising. Unfortunately, drug companies consider the risks too great and the potential payoff too small to fund a trial at this early stage, so we are working to raise funds through philanthropy. We have estimated the costs of a trial, and the required funds are manageable, but we will need help from your community -- and beyond -- to raise these funds. > > Many of the details of the trial are still being worked out at this time. We have many options for drug treatment strategies under consideration. With regard to Prozac, a decision has not been made whether it will be included in the first trial. When our plans and protocol are finalized, we will certainly distribute those details to you and your community. Sadly, due to our many time commitments, we cannot update our websites as frequently as we would like. However, we are in the midst of a site redesign that we hope will greatly increase the rate of new content, including information on any trials. > > Best, > > Craig > > Craig C. Garner, Ph.D. > Professor of Psychiatry > & Behavioral Sciences > Pritzker Laboratory > 1201 Welch Road, Room P106 > Stanford, CA 94305-5485 > > cgarner@... > http://cgarnerlab. stanford. edu > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 That brings up another matter, what about all the people who cannot afford to take the medicine the rest of their lives? So I guess then we will have to decide just who deserves to get the medicine and who doesn't. If you have money your child will be cured if not oh well. Carol In a message dated 7/7/2008 10:18:38 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, Whatever drug is given for cognition would probably have to be taken for the rest of the person’s life,anyway,, right? Or am I just not understanding it?Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 I aim to please! lol Thank you. I feel so free now;-)Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 I would still have to decide if the risks out weighed the benefits regardless. It's not just about giving a voice or whatever is targeted it's about life long safety issues and what effects might show up down the road. It's not as simple as oh if we give this she will speak but let's not think about how it might destroy something else over the years as she is taking it. I am just not convinced that anything we give won't have worse side effects years later and so far the studies being done has not been done over a life span to warrant me thinking there will be no side effect and by the way not all insurances covers all meds. I know of several people who's insurance doesn't cover some heart meds and they have to pay out of pocket for them if they want to continue to take them and of course they are not cheap we are talking about over a hundred per pill. Even medicaid doesn't approve all meds to be taken. Carol Actually, they may not have to take the drug their entire lives. :-)And if it helps a person, I am sure insurance will pay, not to mention the cost to society would go DOWN if people needed less supports and were better able to take care of themselves.What if a new drug ( tested, not just messing around with the newest craze stuff) gave Trisha a voice!! Enabled her to tell you all the things she can't right now? Carol in IL AIM doihavtasay1 GigaTribe doihavtasayMom to seven including , 7 with TOF, AVcanal, GERD, LS, Asthma, subglottal stenosis, and DS.My problem is not how I look. It's how you see me. Join our Down Syndrome information group - http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/DownSyndromeInfoExchange/ Listen to o ldest dd's music http://www.myspace.com/vennamusic Re: [DownSyndromeInfoEx change] Re: Fw: DS Clinical Trials- From Dr Craig Garner again no one said you have to pick and choose, your comment about school and such was way over the top. I did not say it was a scared cow nor did I say you can't try to improve cognition but there are other ways other than drugs and some of us prefer to take the least invasive method. I know how some drugs have made me feel and I was able to tell the doctor or make the decision to stop taking it but with Trisha and I am only speaking for us not the whole world or all the cows for that matter, since she can't tell us how she feels to me it would be unkind to put her on something that might make her feel strange or uncomfortable in some way and her not be able to tell us. And what is the point of raising the IQ a few points if as I have heard so much talk about that IQ scores doesn't mean anything anyway? The point is, we each have a right to decide how we will raise our kids and that doesn't make it right or wrong just our own choice. I personally don't know why you keep referring to sacred cows and such but that is your right and I respect that you have the right to have an obsession about cows. :-) Carol In a message dated 7/7/2008 10:10:22 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, Kathy_Rcomcast (DOT) net writes: But how do you decide which ones are ok to try to fix/help? Why is cognition a sacred cow that we are not supposed to try to improve? That is all I am trying to point out. Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 It's not assuming the worst it's from past experience. As mentioned before look at the cost for some heart meds. Look how anything that is labeled medical or theraputic the price will jump up much higher. Carol I think that is kind of jumping to conclusions…the drugs haven’t even been developed yet..no way of knowing how much they will cost, so why assume that people will be excluded? The ideal would be that when the drug was be trialed, it would be effective, safe and inexpensive. No point in assuming the worst right out of the gate, IMO. KathyR From: DownSyndromeInfoExchange [mailto:DownSyndromeInfoExchange ] On Behalf Of CsvillarsaolSent: Monday, July 07, 2008 10:26 PMTo: DownSyndromeInfoExchange Subject: Re: [DownSyndromeInfoExchange] Re: Fw: DS Clinical Trials- From Dr Craig Garner That brings up another matter, what about all the people who cannot afford to take the medicine the rest of their lives? So I guess then we will have to decide just who deserves to get the medicine and who doesn't. If you have money your child will be cured if not oh well. Carol In a message dated 7/7/2008 10:18:38 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, Whatever drug is given for cognition would probably have to be taken for the rest of the person’s life,anyway,, right? Or am I just not understanding it? Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 sorry but you are assuming everyone has insurance of some kind and sadly that just isn't always the case. I personally do not have insurance and I know many, many people in the same position I am in. And medicaid doesn't pay for a lot of meds that can be beneficial to people because of the high cost of the meds. I know this because it refused to pay for a needed medicine for my sister when she was on medicaid. I do think insurance would pay, so would Medicaid because it would cost them less in the long run.Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 you are assuming that just because we don't want to go with the drug solution at least for now, that we don't want to "treat" the cognition. It's sad that if one disagrees then they are labeled as not wanting to help their child's cognition. What if the drug makes them feel miserable but yet it does improve cognition to the point that they can tell you how bad they might feel would you still push the drug even if they don't like it? Carol that, for some reason, it is not right to want to improve your child’s IQ even if there is a safe way to do so.Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 please quote me on where I said that research shouldn't be supported! That is what gets me when this is discussed if anyone thinks differently then they are assumed to not want research or not want their child to learn or grow why is that? Why can't I think differently without being assumed I don't want research and I don't want my child to receive help? I'd also feel the same way if it was about something else going on other than cognition. But I guess I"m just a bad parent who doesn't care right? most people with DS do get benefits though. And, not to blunt, if a person didn't get a med and died, it would cost medicaid less... but not to give a person a drug that would take them OFF medicaid, would be counter productive.Course I do realize we *are* talking about the govt here.... <g>I don't really see that as a valid reason not to support the research though.... Carol in IL AIM doihavtasay1 GigaTribe doihavtasayMom to seven including , 7 with TOF, AVcanal, GERD, LS, Asthma, subglottal stenosis, and DS.My problem is not how I look. It's how you see me. Join our Down Syndrome information group - http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/DownSyndromeInfoExchange/ Listen to oldest dd's music http://www.myspace.com/vennamusic Re: [DownSyndromeInfoExchange] Re: Fw: DS Clinical Trials- From Dr Craig Garner sorry but you are assuming everyone has insurance of some kind and sadly that just isn't always the case. I personally do not have insurance and I know many, many people in the same position I am in. And medicaid doesn't pay for a lot of meds that can be beneficial to people because of the high cost of the meds. I know this because it refused to pay for a needed medicine for my sister when she was on medicaid. In a message dated 7/7/2008 10:47:47 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, ps1272000yahoo (DOT) com writes: I do think insurance would pay, so would Medicaid because it would cost them less in the long run. Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 it will always be a line for anything that is beneficial to anyone. So even if the DS groups would help to pay for it, it would all depend on how much money they have and it would either go to the first come first serve or they would limit how many times they could help a person before telling them they will have to go elsewhere as they can only help so many at a time. It's the same when people go to food banks they are told we can only help you X amount of times in a year as we need to be able to help a few others as well. Nothing is as easy as oh ok we will give the meds out to everyone who needs it for the rest of their lives. Now do you really see that happening? Carol Try www.needymeds.com my 86 yr old mom has to take a blood pressure medicine that costs $80 a month, and her insurance (and Medicare)won’t pay for it…so since she qualifies because of her limited income, she gets the med for free from the drug company. Besides that,,,,if a drug is developed that will treat Ds, why couldn’t the Ds groups use the money that they receive in donations to help pay for the drugs ? They wouldn’t have to use as much of the money for other programs if there was a treatment. kathyR From: DownSyndromeInfoExchange [mailto:DownSyndromeInfoExchange ] On Behalf Of CsvillarsaolSent: Monday, July 07, 2008 10:50 PMTo: DownSyndromeInfoExchange Subject: Re: [DownSyndromeInfoExchange] Re: Fw: DS Clinical Trials- From Dr Craig Garner sorry but you are assuming everyone has insurance of some kind and sadly that just isn't always the case. I personally do not have insurance and I know many, many people in the same position I am in. And medicaid doesn't pay for a lot of meds that can be beneficial to people because of the high cost of the meds. I know this because it refused to pay for a needed medicine for my sister when she was on medicaid. In a message dated 7/7/2008 10:47:47 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, ps1272000 writes: I do think insurance would pay, so would Medicaid because it would cost them less in the long run. Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 you know you are right as usual. I am totally wrong and sorry I even voiced my opinions. From now on I'll keep my thoughts to myself! Carol, I think that you read a lot into other people answers that they never intended to say. You are the one who started talking about how you didn’t think that parents should “fix’ their kids. Carol V.wrote: “It's not our children who need the fixing it's the > rest of us because it's the so called normal people who will abusethem, take > advantage of them now please explain why I would want my child to be normal > again? I'd much rather be spending my time finding supplements forthe "normal > people" that will help them to be accepting, kind, compassionate,non-abusive > etc.â€â€ From: DownSyndromeInfoExchange [mailto:DownSyndromeInfoExchange ] On Behalf Of CsvillarsaolSent: Monday, July 07, 2008 10:57 PMTo: DownSyndromeInfoExchange Subject: Re: [DownSyndromeInfoExchange] Re: Fw: DS Clinical Trials- From Dr Craig Garner please quote me on where I said that research shouldn't be supported! That is what gets me when this is discussed if anyone thinks differently then they are assumed to not want research or not want their child to learn or grow why is that? Why can't I think differently without being assumed I don't want research and I don't want my child to receive help? I'd also feel the same way if it was about something else going on other than cognition. But I guess I"m just a bad parent who doesn't care right? In a message dated 7/7/2008 10:53:53 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, ps1272000 writes: most people with DS do get benefits though. And, not to blunt, if a person didn't get a med and died, it would cost medicaid less... but not to give a person a drug that would take them OFF medicaid, would be counter productive.Course I do realize we *are* talking about the govt here.... <g>I don't really see that as a valid reason not to support the research though.... Carol in IL AIM doihavtasay1 GigaTribe doihavtasayMom to seven including , 7 with TOF, AVcanal, GERD, LS, Asthma, subglottal stenosis, and DS.My problem is not how I look. It's how you see me. Join our Down Syndrome information group - http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/DownSyndromeInfoExchange/ Listen to oldest dd's music http://www.myspace.com/vennamusic Re: [DownSyndromeInfoExchange] Re: Fw: DS Clinical Trials- From Dr Craig Garner sorry but you are assuming everyone has insurance of some kind and sadly that just isn't always the case. I personally do not have insurance and I know many, many people in the same position I am in. And medicaid doesn't pay for a lot of meds that can be beneficial to people because of the high cost of the meds. I know this because it refused to pay for a needed medicine for my sister when she was on medicaid. In a message dated 7/7/2008 10:47:47 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, ps1272000yahoo (DOT) com writes: I do think insurance would pay, so would Medicaid because it would cost them less in the long run. Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 I agree…I think that people should look at the cognition research and studies before dismissing it…not saying that people HAVE to agree to treat their child if they are strongly against it…but I think that parents have a responsibility to at least look at all of the pros and cons so that they can make an informed decision. kathyR From: DownSyndromeInfoExchange [mailto:DownSyndromeInfoExchange ] On Behalf Of Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 10:18 PM To: DownSyndromeInfoExchange Subject: Re: [DownSyndromeInfoExchange] Re: Fw: DS Clinical Trials- From Dr Craig Garner no your right. Now Im not opposed to any of this just skeptical. I need to see the research and studies. - Whatever drug is given for cognition would probably have to be taken for the rest of the person’s life,anyway,, right? Or am I just not understanding it? From: DownSyndromeInfoExchange [mailto:DownSyndromeInfoExchange ] On Behalf Of Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 9:49 PM To: DownSyndromeInfoExchange Subject: Re: [DownSyndromeInfoExchange] Re: Fw: DS Clinical Trials- From Dr Craig Garner Marsha, I do research medicines. As a RN, I am constantly getting information about new drugs coming out. I do have a problem with most medicines especially Prozac. Prozac is a psych med that can become addictive to which is is near impossible for that individual taking it to go off of it. I know this because of my sister in law. She has been on it for years and can not stop taking it. Im and all for new research that improves my son's life but am just skeptical about them. Carol, I certainly understand your feelings - but I still maintain that if a safe and effective treatment can be provided for these children, then it ought to be done. Perhaps not for your daughter, but for those who would choose such a treatment. I also understand your concern about the drugs, I think that we're all concerned - but we need to move ahead. It seems to me that the general public with normal children are more sympathetic and enthusiastic about change for these children than many parents of children with DS. I'm sorry, I just don't understand what motivates them. I've always looked for answers and I'm not always the most balanced in that aspect, but I just don't understand parents who won't even try Ginkgo Biloba. They're not motivated to even do that much or research it. Also, remember that people with DS are susceptable to AD at an early age. Marsha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 Thank you. I feel so free now;-) KathyR From: DownSyndromeInfoExchange [mailto:DownSyndromeInfoExchange ] On Behalf Of Csvillars@... Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 10:24 PM To: DownSyndromeInfoExchange Subject: Re: [DownSyndromeInfoExchange] Re: Fw: DS Clinical Trials- From Dr Craig Garner again no one said you have to pick and choose, your comment about school and such was way over the top. I did not say it was a scared cow nor did I say you can't try to improve cognition but there are other ways other than drugs and some of us prefer to take the least invasive method. I know how some drugs have made me feel and I was able to tell the doctor or make the decision to stop taking it but with Trisha and I am only speaking for us not the whole world or all the cows for that matter, since she can't tell us how she feels to me it would be unkind to put her on something that might make her feel strange or uncomfortable in some way and her not be able to tell us. And what is the point of raising the IQ a few points if as I have heard so much talk about that IQ scores doesn't mean anything anyway? The point is, we each have a right to decide how we will raise our kids and that doesn't make it right or wrong just our own choice. I personally don't know why you keep referring to sacred cows and such but that is your right and I respect that you have the right to have an obsession about cows. :-) Carol In a message dated 7/7/2008 10:10:22 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, Kathy_R@... writes: But how do you decide which ones are ok to try to fix/help? Why is cognition a sacred cow that we are not supposed to try to improve? That is all I am trying to point out. Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 Actually, they may not have to take the drug their entire lives. :-)And if it helps a person, I am sure insurance will pay, not to mention the cost to society would go DOWN if people needed less supports and were better able to take care of themselves.What if a new drug ( tested, not just messing around with the newest craze stuff) gave Trisha a voice!! Enabled her to tell you all the things she can't right now? Carol in IL AIM doihavtasay1 GigaTribe doihavtasayMom to seven including , 7 with TOF, AVcanal, GERD, LS, Asthma, subglottal stenosis, and DS.My problem is not how I look. It's how you see me. Join our Down Syndrome information group - http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/DownSyndromeInfoExchange/ Listen to oldest dd's music http://www.myspace.com/vennamusic----- Original Message ----To: DownSyndromeInfoExchange Sent: Monday, July 7, 2008 9:28:16 PMSubject: RE: [DownSyndromeInfoExchange] Re: Fw: DS Clinical Trials- From Dr Craig Garner Thank you. I feel so free now;-) KathyR From: DownSyndromeInfoExc hange@yahoogroup s.com [mailto:DownSyndrom eInfoExchange@ yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of Csvillarsaol (DOT) com Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 10:24 PM To: DownSyndromeInfoExc hange@yahoogroup s.com Subject: Re: [DownSyndromeInfoEx change] Re: Fw: DS Clinical Trials- From Dr Craig Garner again no one said you have to pick and choose, your comment about school and such was way over the top. I did not say it was a scared cow nor did I say you can't try to improve cognition but there are other ways other than drugs and some of us prefer to take the least invasive method. I know how some drugs have made me feel and I was able to tell the doctor or make the decision to stop taking it but with Trisha and I am only speaking for us not the whole world or all the cows for that matter, since she can't tell us how she feels to me it would be unkind to put her on something that might make her feel strange or uncomfortable in some way and her not be able to tell us. And what is the point of raising the IQ a few points if as I have heard so much talk about that IQ scores doesn't mean anything anyway? The point is, we each have a right to decide how we will raise our kids and that doesn't make it right or wrong just our own choice. I personally don't know why you keep referring to sacred cows and such but that is your right and I respect that you have the right to have an obsession about cows. :-) Carol In a message dated 7/7/2008 10:10:22 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, Kathy_Rcomcast (DOT) net writes: But how do you decide which ones are ok to try to fix/help? Why is cognition a sacred cow that we are not supposed to try to improve? That is all I am trying to point out. Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 I agree with what you're saying Kathy, but the other treatments you site are already established, not experimental. The efforts to improve cognition are still experimental. When Faith needed open heart surgery I wanted the doctor who did that surgery all the time and was experienced. In seeking an endocrinologist, I wanted an experienced one. So, when thinking about unproven efforts to improve cognition, I'm not going to be the first to jump at it. Doesn't mean I'm not following the developments, I am. I'm also looking forward to seeing some successes. ette -------------- Original message from "Kathy Ratkiewicz" : -------------- I don’t understand why it is ok to *fix* a child’s heart defect, treat hypothyroidism,leukemia,, etc, yet we balk at treatments to improve cognition. What is sacred about cognition that it is *bad* to do what you can to improve it if possible? Why do therapy at all if we “accept our kids as they are� Isn’t therapy ‘fixing’ kids? Isn’t school?? If a person’s IQ could be improved a few points, that might be the difference between them having to live in a group home/assisted care and being able to live independently. KathyR From: DownSyndromeInfoExchange [mailto:DownSyndromeInfoExchange ] On Behalf Of CsvillarsaolSent: Monday, July 07, 2008 9:20 PMTo: DownSyndromeInfoExchange Subject: Re: [DownSyndromeInfoExchange] Re: Fw: DS Clinical Trials- From Dr Craig Garner You most certainly have the right to think what you please but to say many parents are apathetic regarding their children IS just an opinion. To me it bothers me when people speak of someone with DS as having a disease that needs to be cured. Trisha is not a guinea pig or an experiment and I choose not to treat her as such. I do not fill her up with the latest craze of supplements or send her to therapy to the point that she no longer has a life, It's not only about accepting her the way she is but it's also about learning from her as well because of the way she is. There is much we could learn from our children if only we took the time instead of spending most of our time trying to fix them. Did anyone ever stop to think maybe our children are here because they are here to teach us the basic of life like, slow down, accept people as they are not as we would want them to be or even maybe to help us learn how to deal with old age? Do I want to give Trisha opportunities to learn and to grow, of course I do but what I do not want to do is change who she is. Trisha is a gift from God just like her brother was a gift from God why should one try to perfect something that just maybe is already perfect but because we think if someone is different they need to be fixed just maybe it's us who needs to be fixed. It's not our children who need the fixing it's the rest of us because it's the so called normal people who will abuse them, take advantage of them now please explain why I would want my child to be normal again? I'd much rather be spending my time finding supplements for the "normal people" that will help them to be accepting, kind, compassionate, non-abusive etc. That's where the work is really needed. With all the high blood pressure, heart disease, cancers obesity and so forth it seems to me we ought to work on ourselves before trying to fix someone else. I wonder what goes on in the heads of our kids and I wonder if they think we can't love them as they are because we are always trying to fix them and make them what we deem better but just maybe they are ok and happy with who they are and how they are. People used to say the children with DS were always happy but now that isn't true any more so I have to wonder were they always happy or at least happier before we decided they needed fixing? Have you ever asked yourself what is it that they are smiling at when we see nothing that we think would make them smile? Teaching them, making sure they are healthy is a parent's job just like it is for any of our children regardless of their abilities but when we as parents get so gungho over it that they no longer have lives beyond their disabilities all in the name of helping them I have to wonder why we are so fired up crazy to fix something when we ourselves are probably more damaged and in need of fixing ourselves. This of course is only my opinion and please don't say I am apathetic or have my head in the ground because like everyone else I am entitled to my opinion and to raise my child as best as I can just like I did for my son who is supposedly "typical". I want her to have a good life just like I want for my son but that doesn't mean a good life can only be obtained if she is "normal". We all have a purpose in life just because we don't always know what that purpose is for each of us doesn't mean that only those who are "normal" have a purpose. Sometimes I think Trisha's purpose is to drive me crazy and then I remember oh no that was her brother's job and then I look at her and know that whatever her purpose is in life she will actually do better reaching it than I will because she still has the ability to think with an open mind and not be judgmental or cynical as some of us have become. She takes her time which drives me crazy but would probably help lower my blood pressure if I just followed her lead. :-) Do not ever think I am not passionate about my child because I am but I just think sometimes when we fix things now we don't know what we might have broken for the future. It's just like with the vaccines, what at one time was thought to be a fix is now today considered a huge mistake and what we do today as a fix people 10-20 or more years from now might just think how barbaric we are. We don't know what drugs can do to our bodies as we age and by the time our kids are our age we won't be there to say I'm sorry if our fixes actually broke something else. JMHO. Carol Trishasmom In a message dated 7/7/2008 8:32:46 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, mscheitlinverizon (DOT) net writes: It seems to me that many parents with children with DS are rather apathetic about their child's condition Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 I think that is kind of jumping to conclusions…the drugs haven’t even been developed yet..no way of knowing how much they will cost, so why assume that people will be excluded? The ideal would be that when the drug was be trialed, it would be effective, safe and inexpensive. No point in assuming the worst right out of the gate, IMO. KathyR From: DownSyndromeInfoExchange [mailto:DownSyndromeInfoExchange ] On Behalf Of Csvillars@... Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 10:26 PM To: DownSyndromeInfoExchange Subject: Re: [DownSyndromeInfoExchange] Re: Fw: DS Clinical Trials- From Dr Craig Garner That brings up another matter, what about all the people who cannot afford to take the medicine the rest of their lives? So I guess then we will have to decide just who deserves to get the medicine and who doesn't. If you have money your child will be cured if not oh well. Carol In a message dated 7/7/2008 10:18:38 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, Whatever drug is given for cognition would probably have to be taken for the rest of the person’s life,anyway,, right? Or am I just not understanding it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 Well I don't disagree with concerns over side effects. That worries me too. I am hoping they use a drug that already has proven track record for long term use. I think everyone is going to have weigh benefits vs risks.I do think insurance would pay, so would Medicaid because it would cost them less in the long run. Carol in IL AIM doihavtasay1 GigaTribe doihavtasayMom to seven including , 7 with TOF, AVcanal, GERD, LS, Asthma, subglottal stenosis, and DS.My problem is not how I look. It's how you see me. Join our Down Syndrome information group - http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/DownSyndromeInfoExchange/ Listen to oldest dd's music http://www.myspace.com/vennamusic----- Original Message ----To: DownSyndromeInfoExchange Sent: Monday, July 7, 2008 9:42:15 PMSubject: Re: [DownSyndromeInfoExchange] Re: Fw: DS Clinical Trials- From Dr Craig Garner I would still have to decide if the risks out weighed the benefits regardless. It's not just about giving a voice or whatever is targeted it's about life long safety issues and what effects might show up down the road. It's not as simple as oh if we give this she will speak but let's not think about how it might destroy something else over the years as she is taking it. I am just not convinced that anything we give won't have worse side effects years later and so far the studies being done has not been done over a life span to warrant me thinking there will be no side effect and by the way not all insurances covers all meds. I know of several people who's insurance doesn't cover some heart meds and they have to pay out of pocket for them if they want to continue to take them and of course they are not cheap we are talking about over a hundred per pill. Even medicaid doesn't approve all meds to be taken. Carol In a message dated 7/7/2008 10:37:52 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, ps1272000yahoo (DOT) com writes: Actually, they may not have to take the drug their entire lives. :-)And if it helps a person, I am sure insurance will pay, not to mention the cost to society would go DOWN if people needed less supports and were better able to take care of themselves.What if a new drug ( tested, not just messing around with the newest craze stuff) gave Trisha a voice!! Enabled her to tell you all the things she can't right now? Carol in IL AIM doihavtasay1 GigaTribe doihavtasayMom to seven including , 7 with TOF, AVcanal, GERD, LS, Asthma, subglottal stenosis, and DS.My problem is not how I look. It's how you see me. Join our Down Syndrome information group - http://health. groups.yahoo. com/group/ DownSyndromeInfo Exchange/ Listen to o ldest dd's music http://www.myspace. com/vennamusic Re: [DownSyndromeInfoEx change] Re: Fw: DS Clinical Trials- From Dr Craig Garner again no one said you have to pick and choose, your comment about school and such was way over the top. I did not say it was a scared cow nor did I say you can't try to improve cognition but there are other ways other than drugs and some of us prefer to take the least invasive method. I know how some drugs have made me feel and I was able to tell the doctor or make the decision to stop taking it but with Trisha and I am only speaking for us not the whole world or all the cows for that matter, since she can't tell us how she feels to me it would be unkind to put her on something that might make her feel strange or uncomfortable in some way and her not be able to tell us. And what is the point of raising the IQ a few points if as I have heard so much talk about that IQ scores doesn't mean anything anyway? The point is, we each have a right to decide how we will raise our kids and that doesn't make it right or wrong just our own choice. I personally don't know why you keep referring to sacred cows and such but that is your right and I respect that you have the right to have an obsession about cows. :-) Carol In a message dated 7/7/2008 10:10:22 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, Kathy_Rcomcast (DOT) net writes: But how do you decide which ones are ok to try to fix/help? Why is cognition a sacred cow that we are not supposed to try to improve? That is all I am trying to point out. Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 No, you are right….and I have said before that I am not in favor of giving  Danny drugs for cognition that haven’t been trialed for safety, etc.. I am talking about the idea of being against treating cognition on principle…that, for some reason, it is not right to want to improve your child’s IQ even if there is a safe way to do so. kathyR From: DownSyndromeInfoExchange [mailto:DownSyndromeInfoExchange ] On Behalf Of pbeurrier@... Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 10:40 PM To: DownSyndromeInfoExchange Subject: RE: [DownSyndromeInfoExchange] Re: Fw: DS Clinical Trials- From Dr Craig Garner I agree with what you're saying Kathy, but the other treatments you site are already established, not experimental. The efforts to improve cognition are still experimental. When Faith needed open heart surgery I wanted the doctor who did that surgery all the time and was experienced. In seeking an endocrinologist, I wanted an experienced one. So, when thinking about unproven efforts to improve cognition, I'm not going to be the first to jump at it. Doesn't mean I'm not following the developments, I am. I'm also looking forward to seeing some successes. ette --------- Re: [DownSyndromeInfoExchange] Re: Fw: DS Clinical Trials- From Dr Craig Garner You most certainly have the right to think what you please but to say many parents are apathetic regarding their children IS just an opinion. To me it bothers me when people speak of someone with DS as having a disease that needs to be cured. Trisha is not a guinea pig or an experiment and I choose not to treat her as such. I do not fill her up with the latest craze of supplements or send her to therapy to the point that she no longer has a life, It's not only about accepting her the way she is but it's also about learning from her as well because of the way she is. There is much we could learn from our children if only we took the time instead of spending most of our time trying to fix them. Did anyone ever stop to think maybe our children are here because they are here to teach us the basic of life like, slow down, accept people as they are not as we would want them to be or even maybe to help us learn how to deal with old age? Do I want to give Trisha opportunities to learn and to grow, of course I do but what I do not want to do is change who she is. Trisha is a gift from God just like her brother was a gift from God why should one try to perfect something that just maybe is already perfect but because we think if someone is different they need to be fixed just maybe it's us who needs to be fixed. It's not our children who need the fixing it's the rest of us because it's the so called normal people who will abuse them, take advantage of them now please explain why I would want my child to be normal again? I'd much rather be spending my time finding supplements for the " normal people " that will help them to be accepting, kind, compassionate, non-abusive etc. That's where the work is really needed. With all the high blood pressure, heart disease, cancers obesity and so forth it seems to me we ought to work on ourselves before trying to fix someone else. I wonder what goes on in the heads of our kids and I wonder if they think we can't love them as they are because we are always trying to fix them and make them what we deem better but just maybe they are ok and happy with who they are and how they are. People used to say the children with DS were always happy but now that isn't true any more so I have to wonder were they always happy or at least happier before we decided they needed fixing? Have you ever asked yourself what is it that they are smiling at when we see nothing that we think would make them smile? Teaching them, making sure they are healthy is a parent's job just like it is for any of our children regardless of their abilities but when we as parents get so gungho over it that they no longer have lives beyond their disabilities all in the name of helping them I have to wonder why we are so fired up crazy to fix something when we ourselves are probably more damaged and in need of fixing ourselves. This of course is only my opinion and please don't say I am apathetic or have my head in the ground because like everyone else I am entitled to my opinion and to raise my child as best as I can just like I did for my son who is supposedly " typical " . I want her to have a good life just like I want for my son but that doesn't mean a good life can only be obtained if she is " normal " . We all have a purpose in life just because we don't always know what that purpose is for each of us doesn't mean that only those who are " normal " have a purpose. Sometimes I think Trisha's purpose is to drive me crazy and then I remember oh no that was her brother's job and then I look at her and know that whatever her purpose is in life she will actually do better reaching it than I will because she still has the ability to think with an open mind and not be judgmental or cynical as some of us have become. She takes her time which drives me crazy but would probably help lower my blood pressure if I just followed her lead. :-) Do not ever think I am not passionate about my child because I am but I just think sometimes when we fix things now we don't know what we might have broken for the future. It's just like with the vaccines, what at one time was thought to be a fix is now today considered a huge mistake and what we do today as a fix people 10-20 or more years from now might just think how barbaric we are. We don't know what drugs can do to our bodies as we age and by the time our kids are our age we won't be there to say I'm sorry if our fixes actually broke something else. JMHO. Carol Trishasmom In a message dated 7/7/2008 8:32:46 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, mscheitlin@... writes: It seems to me that many parents with children with DS are rather apathetic about their child's condition Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 NOT if all of the babies with Ds have been aborted, however…if the current trend continues, and babies are aborted at such a high rate, research in Ds will stop, because why bother to treat something that will be extinguished in 60 yrs or so anyway(when the people w/Ds already living are all gone?) From: DownSyndromeInfoExchange [mailto:DownSyndromeInfoExchange ] On Behalf Of Carol in IL Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 10:47 PM To: DownSyndromeInfoExchange Subject: Re: [DownSyndromeInfoExchange] Re: Fw: DS Clinical Trials- From Dr Craig Garner Well I don't disagree with concerns over side effects. That worries me too. I am hoping they use a drug that already has proven track record for long term use. I think everyone is going to have weigh benefits vs risks. I do think insurance would pay, so would Medicaid because it would cost them less in the long run. Carol in IL AIM doihavtasay1 GigaTribe doihavtasay Mom to seven including , 7 with TOF, AVcanal, GERD, LS, Asthma, subglottal stenosis, and DS. My problem is not how I look. It's how you see me. Join our Down Syndrome information group - http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/DownSyndromeInfoExchange/ Listen to oldest dd's music http://www.myspace.com/vennamusic Re: [DownSyndromeInfoEx change] Re: Fw: DS Clinical Trials- From Dr Craig Garner again no one said you have to pick and choose, your comment about school and such was way over the top. I did not say it was a scared cow nor did I say you can't try to improve cognition but there are other ways other than drugs and some of us prefer to take the least invasive method. I know how some drugs have made me feel and I was able to tell the doctor or make the decision to stop taking it but with Trisha and I am only speaking for us not the whole world or all the cows for that matter, since she can't tell us how she feels to me it would be unkind to put her on something that might make her feel strange or uncomfortable in some way and her not be able to tell us. And what is the point of raising the IQ a few points if as I have heard so much talk about that IQ scores doesn't mean anything anyway? The point is, we each have a right to decide how we will raise our kids and that doesn't make it right or wrong just our own choice. I personally don't know why you keep referring to sacred cows and such but that is your right and I respect that you have the right to have an obsession about cows. :-) Carol In a message dated 7/7/2008 10:10:22 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, Kathy_Rcomcast (DOT) net writes: But how do you decide which ones are ok to try to fix/help? Why is cognition a sacred cow that we are not supposed to try to improve? That is all I am trying to point out. Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 most people with DS do get benefits though. And, not to blunt, if a person didn't get a med and died, it would cost medicaid less... but not to give a person a drug that would take them OFF medicaid, would be counter productive.Course I do realize we *are* talking about the govt here.... <g>I don't really see that as a valid reason not to support the research though.... Carol in IL AIM doihavtasay1 GigaTribe doihavtasayMom to seven including , 7 with TOF, AVcanal, GERD, LS, Asthma, subglottal stenosis, and DS.My problem is not how I look. It's how you see me. Join our Down Syndrome information group - http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/DownSyndromeInfoExchange/ Listen to oldest dd's music http://www.myspace.com/vennamusic----- Original Message ----To: DownSyndromeInfoExchange Sent: Monday, July 7, 2008 9:49:51 PMSubject: Re: [DownSyndromeInfoExchange] Re: Fw: DS Clinical Trials- From Dr Craig Garner sorry but you are assuming everyone has insurance of some kind and sadly that just isn't always the case. I personally do not have insurance and I know many, many people in the same position I am in. And medicaid doesn't pay for a lot of meds that can be beneficial to people because of the high cost of the meds. I know this because it refused to pay for a needed medicine for my sister when she was on medicaid. In a message dated 7/7/2008 10:47:47 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, ps1272000yahoo (DOT) com writes: I do think insurance would pay, so would Medicaid because it would cost them less in the long run.Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 Oh so true......more reason to get behind research NOW Carol in IL AIM doihavtasay1 GigaTribe doihavtasayMom to seven including , 7 with TOF, AVcanal, GERD, LS, Asthma, subglottal stenosis, and DS.My problem is not how I look. It's how you see me. Join our Down Syndrome information group - http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/DownSyndromeInfoExchange/ Listen to oldest dd's music http://www.myspace.com/vennamusic----- Original Message ----To: DownSyndromeInfoExchange Sent: Monday, July 7, 2008 9:53:02 PMSubject: RE: [DownSyndromeInfoExchange] Re: Fw: DS Clinical Trials- From Dr Craig Garner NOT if all of the babies with Ds have been aborted, however…if the current trend continues, and babies are aborted at such a high rate, research in Ds will stop, because why bother to treat something that will be extinguished in 60 yrs or so anyway(when the people w/Ds already living are all gone?) From: DownSyndromeInfoExc hange@yahoogroup s.com [mailto:DownSyndrom eInfoExchange@ yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of Carol in IL Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 10:47 PM To: DownSyndromeInfoExc hange@yahoogroup s.com Subject: Re: [DownSyndromeInfoEx change] Re: Fw: DS Clinical Trials- From Dr Craig Garner Well I don't disagree with concerns over side effects. That worries me too. I am hoping they use a drug that already has proven track record for long term use. I think everyone is going to have weigh benefits vs risks. I do think insurance would pay, so would Medicaid because it would cost them less in the long run. Carol in IL AIM doihavtasay1 GigaTribe doihavtasay Mom to seven including , 7 with TOF, AVcanal, GERD, LS, Asthma, subglottal stenosis, and DS. My problem is not how I look. It's how you see me. Join our Down Syndrome information group - http://health. groups.yahoo. com/group/ DownSyndromeInfo Exchange/ Listen to oldest dd's music http://www.myspace. com/vennamusic Re: [DownSyndromeInfoEx change] Re: Fw: DS Clinical Trials- From Dr Craig Garner again no one said you have to pick and choose, your comment about school and such was way over the top. I did not say it was a scared cow nor did I say you can't try to improve cognition but there are other ways other than drugs and some of us prefer to take the least invasive method. I know how some drugs have made me feel and I was able to tell the doctor or make the decision to stop taking it but with Trisha and I am only speaking for us not the whole world or all the cows for that matter, since she can't tell us how she feels to me it would be unkind to put her on something that might make her feel strange or uncomfortable in some way and her not be able to tell us. And what is the point of raising the IQ a few points if as I have heard so much talk about that IQ scores doesn't mean anything anyway? The point is, we each have a right to decide how we will raise our kids and that doesn't make it right or wrong just our own choice. I personally don't know why you keep referring to sacred cows and such but that is your right and I respect that you have the right to have an obsession about cows. :-) Carol In a message dated 7/7/2008 10:10:22 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, Kathy_Rcomcast (DOT) net writes: But how do you decide which ones are ok to try to fix/help? Why is cognition a sacred cow that we are not supposed to try to improve? That is all I am trying to point out. Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 Try www.needymeds.com my 86 yr old mom has to take a blood pressure medicine that costs $80 a month, and her insurance (and Medicare)won’t pay for it…so since she qualifies because of her limited income, she gets the med for free from the drug company. Besides that,,,,if a drug is developed that will treat Ds, why couldn’t the Ds groups use the money that they receive in donations to help pay for the drugs ? They wouldn’t have to use as much of the money for other programs if there was a treatment. kathyR From: DownSyndromeInfoExchange [mailto:DownSyndromeInfoExchange ] On Behalf Of Csvillars@... Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 10:50 PM To: DownSyndromeInfoExchange Subject: Re: [DownSyndromeInfoExchange] Re: Fw: DS Clinical Trials- From Dr Craig Garner sorry but you are assuming everyone has insurance of some kind and sadly that just isn't always the case. I personally do not have insurance and I know many, many people in the same position I am in. And medicaid doesn't pay for a lot of meds that can be beneficial to people because of the high cost of the meds. I know this because it refused to pay for a needed medicine for my sister when she was on medicaid. In a message dated 7/7/2008 10:47:47 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, ps1272000@... writes: I do think insurance would pay, so would Medicaid because it would cost them less in the long run. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 No, Carol. That is why I said that I would only give Danny something if it was SAFE and effective(see below). Obviously, I would not force him to take something that makes him ill. From: DownSyndromeInfoExchange [mailto:DownSyndromeInfoExchange ] On Behalf Of Csvillars@... Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 10:54 PM To: DownSyndromeInfoExchange Subject: Re: [DownSyndromeInfoExchange] Re: Fw: DS Clinical Trials- From Dr Craig Garner you are assuming that just because we don't want to go with the drug solution at least for now, that we don't want to " treat " the cognition. It's sad that if one disagrees then they are labeled as not wanting to help their child's cognition. What if the drug makes them feel miserable but yet it does improve cognition to the point that they can tell you how bad they might feel would you still push the drug even if they don't like it? Carol In a message dated 7/7/2008 10:50:21 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, Kathy_R@... writes: that, for some reason, it is not right to want to improve your child’s IQ even if there is a safe way to do so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 Carol, I think that you read a lot into other people answers that they never intended to say. You are the one who started talking about how you didn’t think that parents should “fix’ their kids. Carol V.wrote: “It's not our children who need the fixing it's the > rest of us because it's the so called normal people who will abuse them, take > advantage of them now please explain why I would want my child to be normal > again? I'd much rather be spending my time finding supplements for the " normal > people " that will help them to be accepting, kind, compassionate,non-abusive > etc.”” From: DownSyndromeInfoExchange [mailto:DownSyndromeInfoExchange ] On Behalf Of Csvillars@... Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 10:57 PM To: DownSyndromeInfoExchange Subject: Re: [DownSyndromeInfoExchange] Re: Fw: DS Clinical Trials- From Dr Craig Garner please quote me on where I said that research shouldn't be supported! That is what gets me when this is discussed if anyone thinks differently then they are assumed to not want research or not want their child to learn or grow why is that? Why can't I think differently without being assumed I don't want research and I don't want my child to receive help? I'd also feel the same way if it was about something else going on other than cognition. But I guess I " m just a bad parent who doesn't care right? In a message dated 7/7/2008 10:53:53 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, ps1272000@... writes: most people with DS do get benefits though. And, not to blunt, if a person didn't get a med and died, it would cost medicaid less... but not to give a person a drug that would take them OFF medicaid, would be counter productive. Course I do realize we *are* talking about the govt here.... <g> I don't really see that as a valid reason not to support the research though.... Carol in IL AIM doihavtasay1 GigaTribe doihavtasay Mom to seven including , 7 with TOF, AVcanal, GERD, LS, Asthma, subglottal stenosis, and DS. My problem is not how I look. It's how you see me. Join our Down Syndrome information group - http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/DownSyndromeInfoExchange/ Listen to oldest dd's music http://www.myspace.com/vennamusic ----- Original Message ---- To: DownSyndromeInfoExchange Sent: Monday, July 7, 2008 9:49:51 PM Subject: Re: [DownSyndromeInfoExchange] Re: Fw: DS Clinical Trials- From Dr Craig Garner sorry but you are assuming everyone has insurance of some kind and sadly that just isn't always the case. I personally do not have insurance and I know many, many people in the same position I am in. And medicaid doesn't pay for a lot of meds that can be beneficial to people because of the high cost of the meds. I know this because it refused to pay for a needed medicine for my sister when she was on medicaid. In a message dated 7/7/2008 10:47:47 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, ps1272000yahoo (DOT) com writes: I do think insurance would pay, so would Medicaid because it would cost them less in the long run. Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.