Guest guest Posted March 11, 2008 Report Share Posted March 11, 2008 http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080311/NEWS05/803110307 Dad of autistic West Bloomfield girl nearly free of rape charges She won't testify, so case collapses BY JOHN WISELY AND L.L. BRASIER * FREE PRESS STAFF WRITERS * MARCH 11, 2008 A West Bloomfield man who spent 80 days in jail while accused of raping his autistic daughter could be reunited with her as early as today after Oakland County prosecutors suddenly sought to dismiss all charges against him. Bloomfield Hills District Judge Marc Barron has scheduled a 10 a.m. hearing to rule on the request to drop charges against the man and his wife. Prosecutors in December charged the girl's father with repeatedly raping her. His wife was charged with child abuse in failing to stop him. Prosecutors also sought to terminate the couple's custody of the 15-year-old girl and a 13-year-old son who has Asperger's syndrome, a form of autism. The Free Press is not naming the parents to protect the girl's identity. The case has been controversial because the girl's claims were made through facilitated communication, a widely discredited method in which a teaching aide helps a nonverbal student type responses to questions into a keyboard. Experts testified that scientific studies of the method show that the aide, consciously or subconsciously, authors all of the messages. On Monday, prosecutors sought to drop both the criminal and the custody cases, claiming in court filings that the girl had used facilitated communication to tell them that she was afraid and would not testify in court. Without her testimony, the case lacked its central accusation. " The option of alternative proofs have been fully evaluated and found to be not legally sufficient to sustain the requisite burden of proof, " Prosecutor Gorcyca wrote in the request to drop the charges. He declined to comment further. Defense attorneys learned of the move after prosecutors had been in court to seek the dismissal. The request caught them off guard, they said. " Usually, you notify the defense attorneys when you're going to dismiss the case, " said Deborah Tyner, who represents the girl's mother. " We had no indication. " " It was the right thing to do. It's just unfortunate it took so long, " said Robyn el, another attorney in the case. They said that prosecutors were never able to establish that the girl could communicate independently. At two court hearings in January, the girl was unable to answer a single question correctly when her teaching aide did not hear it first. The questions included, " Are you a boy or a girl? " and " What color is your sweater? " " This case should never have been brought, " said lawyer Jerome Sabbota, who represents the girl's father. Oakland County Family Court Judge Joan Young ordered the children to be returned to their parents on Monday, despite prosecutors' claims that the girl still fears her father. Contact JOHN WISELY at or jwisely@.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.