Guest guest Posted June 19, 2009 Report Share Posted June 19, 2009 info - Lung Association Dismayed That Pets Allowed in Airplane Cabins In light of Air Canada's decision to follow WestJet's lead and allow pets to travel in the passenger cabin of airplanes, The Canadian Lung Association today released the following statement: " We are very disappointed by the decision of both Air Canada and WestJet to allow passengers to bring their pets in airplane cabins. This decision, while understandable in its desire to enhance customer service, unnecessarily puts at risk many individuals who suffer from respiratory diseases such as asthma and COPD. Air inside airplane cabins re-circulates- it gets recycled through the vents. And airplane cabins are small spaces. This means that even a small amount of allergen- like the hair, saliva or dander of a pet- can spread quickly throughout the airplane cabin. The allergen in the air can reach every passenger on the plane, even people sitting far away from the pet. For people with allergies who have asthma or COPD, pet allergens can trigger wheezing, coughing, and swelling in the airways - otherwise known as an asthma flare-up (asthma attack) or a COPD flare-up. These reactions can be serious and even life-threatening. The Lung Association is calling on the House of Commons Standing Committee on Health to examine this issue when the Committee resumes sitting in the fall. We believe that the risks posed to passengers warrants the Committee's review of this policy decision by the airlines. The Lung Association would be most willing to appear before the Committee on this topic of importance to the millions of Canadians who suffer from asthma, COPD, allergies and other respiratory diseases. http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/The-Lung-Association-1006190.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 19, 2009 Report Share Posted June 19, 2009 I am with you, Mike. I have a pet parrot, and pretty much gave up flying Air Canada when they passed their No Pet policy. My parrot would not survive the hold. I fly West Jet to support the policy. The animals have to be small enough to fit under a seat and that's pretty tiny. Plus, they limit the number permitted per flight. Rayna > > Not really justifying the practice, but the allergen exposure is not as bad as it seems. Our small mutts travel in a sherpa bag and if they were relegated to the hold, I wouldn't fly. It's dumb for someone like me, who is allergic to dogs, to even have them in the house, but we don't have grandchildren. So we take our meds and spoil the dogs. > > Mike > > info - Lung Association Dismayed > > > > > > > > info - > > Lung Association Dismayed That Pets Allowed in Airplane Cabins > > In light of Air Canada's decision to follow WestJet's lead and allow pets to travel in the passenger cabin of airplanes, > The Canadian Lung Association today released the following statement: > > " We are very disappointed by the decision of both Air Canada and WestJet to allow passengers to bring their pets in airplane cabins. > > This decision, while understandable in its desire to enhance customer service, > unnecessarily puts at risk many individuals who suffer from respiratory diseases such as asthma and COPD. > > Air inside airplane cabins re-circulates- it gets recycled through the vents. > > And airplane cabins are small spaces. > > This means that even a small amount of allergen- like the hair, saliva or dander of a pet- can spread quickly throughout the airplane cabin. > > The allergen in the air can reach every passenger on the plane, even people sitting far away from the pet. > > For people with allergies who have asthma or COPD, pet allergens can trigger wheezing, coughing, and swelling in the airways - > otherwise known as an asthma flare-up (asthma attack) or a COPD flare-up. > > These reactions can be serious and even life-threatening. > > The Lung Association is calling on the House of Commons Standing Committee on Health to examine this issue when the Committee resumes sitting in the fall. > > We believe that the risks posed to passengers warrants the Committee's review of this policy decision by the airlines. > > The Lung Association would be most willing to appear before the Committee on this topic of importance to the millions of Canadians who suffer from asthma, COPD, allergies and other respiratory diseases. > > http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/The-Lung-Association-1006190.html > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 19, 2009 Report Share Posted June 19, 2009 I am with you, Mike. I have a pet parrot, and pretty much gave up flying Air Canada when they passed their No Pet policy. My parrot would not survive the hold. I fly West Jet to support the policy. The animals have to be small enough to fit under a seat and that's pretty tiny. Plus, they limit the number permitted per flight. Rayna > > Not really justifying the practice, but the allergen exposure is not as bad as it seems. Our small mutts travel in a sherpa bag and if they were relegated to the hold, I wouldn't fly. It's dumb for someone like me, who is allergic to dogs, to even have them in the house, but we don't have grandchildren. So we take our meds and spoil the dogs. > > Mike > > info - Lung Association Dismayed > > > > > > > > info - > > Lung Association Dismayed That Pets Allowed in Airplane Cabins > > In light of Air Canada's decision to follow WestJet's lead and allow pets to travel in the passenger cabin of airplanes, > The Canadian Lung Association today released the following statement: > > " We are very disappointed by the decision of both Air Canada and WestJet to allow passengers to bring their pets in airplane cabins. > > This decision, while understandable in its desire to enhance customer service, > unnecessarily puts at risk many individuals who suffer from respiratory diseases such as asthma and COPD. > > Air inside airplane cabins re-circulates- it gets recycled through the vents. > > And airplane cabins are small spaces. > > This means that even a small amount of allergen- like the hair, saliva or dander of a pet- can spread quickly throughout the airplane cabin. > > The allergen in the air can reach every passenger on the plane, even people sitting far away from the pet. > > For people with allergies who have asthma or COPD, pet allergens can trigger wheezing, coughing, and swelling in the airways - > otherwise known as an asthma flare-up (asthma attack) or a COPD flare-up. > > These reactions can be serious and even life-threatening. > > The Lung Association is calling on the House of Commons Standing Committee on Health to examine this issue when the Committee resumes sitting in the fall. > > We believe that the risks posed to passengers warrants the Committee's review of this policy decision by the airlines. > > The Lung Association would be most willing to appear before the Committee on this topic of importance to the millions of Canadians who suffer from asthma, COPD, allergies and other respiratory diseases. > > http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/The-Lung-Association-1006190.html > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 19, 2009 Report Share Posted June 19, 2009 I am with you, Mike. I have a pet parrot, and pretty much gave up flying Air Canada when they passed their No Pet policy. My parrot would not survive the hold. I fly West Jet to support the policy. The animals have to be small enough to fit under a seat and that's pretty tiny. Plus, they limit the number permitted per flight. Rayna > > Not really justifying the practice, but the allergen exposure is not as bad as it seems. Our small mutts travel in a sherpa bag and if they were relegated to the hold, I wouldn't fly. It's dumb for someone like me, who is allergic to dogs, to even have them in the house, but we don't have grandchildren. So we take our meds and spoil the dogs. > > Mike > > info - Lung Association Dismayed > > > > > > > > info - > > Lung Association Dismayed That Pets Allowed in Airplane Cabins > > In light of Air Canada's decision to follow WestJet's lead and allow pets to travel in the passenger cabin of airplanes, > The Canadian Lung Association today released the following statement: > > " We are very disappointed by the decision of both Air Canada and WestJet to allow passengers to bring their pets in airplane cabins. > > This decision, while understandable in its desire to enhance customer service, > unnecessarily puts at risk many individuals who suffer from respiratory diseases such as asthma and COPD. > > Air inside airplane cabins re-circulates- it gets recycled through the vents. > > And airplane cabins are small spaces. > > This means that even a small amount of allergen- like the hair, saliva or dander of a pet- can spread quickly throughout the airplane cabin. > > The allergen in the air can reach every passenger on the plane, even people sitting far away from the pet. > > For people with allergies who have asthma or COPD, pet allergens can trigger wheezing, coughing, and swelling in the airways - > otherwise known as an asthma flare-up (asthma attack) or a COPD flare-up. > > These reactions can be serious and even life-threatening. > > The Lung Association is calling on the House of Commons Standing Committee on Health to examine this issue when the Committee resumes sitting in the fall. > > We believe that the risks posed to passengers warrants the Committee's review of this policy decision by the airlines. > > The Lung Association would be most willing to appear before the Committee on this topic of importance to the millions of Canadians who suffer from asthma, COPD, allergies and other respiratory diseases. > > http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/The-Lung-Association-1006190.html > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.