Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Jo - revisions

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

> Jo

>

> Was that lady who had the revision re-reducing the common channel

or just the stomach?

She just shortened her commom channel to a 50cc. Didn't touch her

stomach....her stomach was still doing a good job with restriction,

not allowing large volumes.

Kristy, I think your beautiful and you look THIN (not sick or Skinny

but NORMAL THIN) You are tall, and after DS the scales will " fool "

people, they will think you weigh much less than what the scales

say. I really don't think a revision would be worth the risk for

you. Loosing more weight is no longer a " HEALTH " issue for you, so

the risk isn't worth it. If its a reduction of the stomach, you

have to look at 's case real hard and think....If it's a

reduction of the bowel you have to think, is the likelyhood of

stinkier bowel movements and increased Gas really worth

it...lol...after all, a single gal really does need to

remain 'socially acceptable' lol.

Jo

Last month I visited a patient who lost too much weight...she became

anorexic, she knows it, she knows she is in trouble. Given a choice

I would rather be 50 pounds overweight than 20 pounds under.

Jo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

> Jo

>

> Was that lady who had the revision re-reducing the common channel

or just the stomach?

She just shortened her commom channel to a 50cc. Didn't touch her

stomach....her stomach was still doing a good job with restriction,

not allowing large volumes.

Kristy, I think your beautiful and you look THIN (not sick or Skinny

but NORMAL THIN) You are tall, and after DS the scales will " fool "

people, they will think you weigh much less than what the scales

say. I really don't think a revision would be worth the risk for

you. Loosing more weight is no longer a " HEALTH " issue for you, so

the risk isn't worth it. If its a reduction of the stomach, you

have to look at 's case real hard and think....If it's a

reduction of the bowel you have to think, is the likelyhood of

stinkier bowel movements and increased Gas really worth

it...lol...after all, a single gal really does need to

remain 'socially acceptable' lol.

Jo

Last month I visited a patient who lost too much weight...she became

anorexic, she knows it, she knows she is in trouble. Given a choice

I would rather be 50 pounds overweight than 20 pounds under.

Jo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

> Jo

>

> Was that lady who had the revision re-reducing the common channel

or just the stomach?

She just shortened her commom channel to a 50cc. Didn't touch her

stomach....her stomach was still doing a good job with restriction,

not allowing large volumes.

Kristy, I think your beautiful and you look THIN (not sick or Skinny

but NORMAL THIN) You are tall, and after DS the scales will " fool "

people, they will think you weigh much less than what the scales

say. I really don't think a revision would be worth the risk for

you. Loosing more weight is no longer a " HEALTH " issue for you, so

the risk isn't worth it. If its a reduction of the stomach, you

have to look at 's case real hard and think....If it's a

reduction of the bowel you have to think, is the likelyhood of

stinkier bowel movements and increased Gas really worth

it...lol...after all, a single gal really does need to

remain 'socially acceptable' lol.

Jo

Last month I visited a patient who lost too much weight...she became

anorexic, she knows it, she knows she is in trouble. Given a choice

I would rather be 50 pounds overweight than 20 pounds under.

Jo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

> I see your point. I havent decided either way but I am like

Sharon - unhappy I have not reached goal.

>

kristy

************************************

kristy- youre at 140 right?? you are so lucky. that is an awesome

weight. you are beautiful. now being 170, i do need to lose more and

i will because im only 9 months out. my point is, you are healthy

and not over weight. be proud of yourself. you deserve it.

vicki

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

> Vicki

>

> No way I am 140!!! I am about 171 pounds. 140 would be a dream!

So, that is why I am still not happy.

>

> Kristy

**************************************

ooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhh- well maybe you looked that way to me. you look

great. model gorgeous darling. what was your starting weight? i ask

because i lose monthly as opposed to weekly and if this keeps up, i

dont know how i will hit goal. did you eat alot of carbs (like me)?

dont know why im bitching. i have to cut back on carbs.

vicki

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...