Guest guest Posted November 17, 2004 Report Share Posted November 17, 2004 So. Here we are in the year 2004. Dad is living in the northwest with his lovely wife, and Mom is living in Oklahoma with her passive but apparently decent husband. I've barely spoken with Mom in the past 15 years, other than fending off the occasional suicide FOG. I see Dad & his sweetie often, and talk with them oftener. In the past couple of decades I have sort of adopted Dad's second wife, if not exactly as a mother (I was, after all, 16 and in no mood to trust female adults when we met) then as a kind of much-loved honorary aunt. She sends me recipies, and advises me on what kind of earrings to wear to job interviews. I go visit them and we sit around in the evening drinking tea and we all tell each other lots of useful information (the sign of love in nerdy families). No one screams or says anything mean. They've been married for eighteen years and frankly, I don't think he's over being startled by happiness. He still seems mildly stunned. Everyone in this little constellation is very quiet and undemonstrative, and quite content with that. Since moving to Europe my sister has more or less dropped out of the family, as far as we are concerned. She has also completely ignored the grandparents, aunts, and uncles. The only person she communicates with, as far as I am aware, is our mother. And as far as I can tell (which may not be very far, you understand-- after all, I haven't seen her much in the past twenty years) they talk on the phone every week or so. As far as I can tell, she simply accepts everything my mother tells her as the gospel truth. So she's not getting much actual information as to what's up with the rest of us. When my mother and I had our last big confrontation, it was over a suicide threat that she sent duplicates of -- and yes, I do mean actual Xerox copies -- to me and to my sister. And I, as I said before, basically gave her both barrels in response. I don't know exactly how my sister reacted, either to the threat itself or to the both-barrels response, because we didn't discuss the matter. The only thing I actually know is that a short time afterward, Mom called me up and explained, in tones of some self-righteousness, that she had sent a copy of my response to my sister, THE THERAPIST, and they had talked it over and agreed that the conflict was happening because... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ....(Can anyone guess? Huh? Huh?) .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ....I have a lot of emotional problems and ought to be in treatment. Now, just to be clear: I don't know whether this actually happened. I only know that my mother said it happened. I also know that after that little gesture at having the last word, she went away and left me alone. Usually she would not do that, so her doing it kind of makes me think my sister did not make any such diagnosis. But I do not know. And after that situation my sister dropped even more completely off everyone's radar. (Enough so that, for example, a college friend of hers emailed me to try and get a mailing address to invite my sister to his wedding, and I had to tell him we didn't know what town she was living in.) While all this loopiness has been going on with me, sister, and Mom, sister and Dad have had their own drama. This consists basically of sister disappearing for months or years at a time, only to reappear and make a sort of theatrical -- and usually tearful -- announcement that she loves him very much and can't stand that they never talk and she really wants to work everything out in their relationship if he will only just try to understand how terribly he hurt her when she was young and helpless and he yelled at her for not being able to write... (this is of course ABSOLUTELY TRUE) .... and if he will just have a big emotional scene with her... (big emotional scenes being the thing he hates most on earth) ....it will all be resolved and they can live happily ever after. On which he, generally, consents to having the big emotional scene, and probably does feel very moved and even perhaps sheds a tear dicreetly into his handkercheif (there is always a neatly folded handkerchief in his left hip pocket). And maybe he says that he wants her to understand that he loves her. And more often than not he sends her a semster's tuition. After which she disappears for a year and a half, and the whole thing starts over. Through all this she has maintained a very clear conviction that she wants a kind of relationship with my father where she can feel safe and loved. And she will feel safe and loved only if she feels really connected. And she will feel really connected only if he has long, intense, passionate conversations with her about his feelings -- something he simply is not going to do, or not directly. And she isn't going to meet him halfway by trying to understand the information-as-love code: she's going to take her feelings of rejection ( " He just keeps distancing me by talking about botany! " ) and cope with them by expressing negative judgments on his mental health. She has a certain idea of how people express love, defined around the way she would most like to receive it, and if he doesn't do that, she's going to diagnose & label him as " unable to express his feelings " . (Sort of like me going to Beijing and complaining that the Chinese can't speak correctly. Evidence: I don't understand them.) And now, in addition to all the belief in her own authority over the world of feeling that she picked up as a split-good, feeling child, she has a graduate degree to back her up. So she sets up a situation where he is only allowed to show love by doing something that basically makes him feel raped, and then passes judgment on him for not being grateful that she's willing to take on the work of fixing his head. It's a horrible situation. I should say, here, that I don't completely disagree with the idea that Dad is unable to express his feelings, or with the idea that he is emotionally damaged to some extent. I think he is -- or rather, I think he has an unusually, and unfortunately, limited range of ways that he can express himself. He is, to put it briefly, a painfully shy man. This is a misfortune. It's also probably worse than it might have been because ... he lived for 23 years with our mother screaming at him from morning til night that he had no feelings, or his feelings were wrong, and anyway he should just lose control so she could feel powerful, and then he would be a real (=feeling) person. I don't doubt that if he went into therapy, say with someone who was experienced & skilled & NOT HIS DAUGHTER, the therapist would say, " We need to help this man loosen up a little. " But being damaged under the circumstances is not surprising, and being shy is in any case not a moral failing. And he has very freely and generously acknowledged the mistakes he made when she was a child, and apologized for them. More than once. So it's hard for me to look at the pain she causes him and say, " She's the child in the relationship, right? It's his job to come to her. " Because it seems like what she's demanding is the caring & consideration that go with being the child AND the power & authority that go with being the parent. And that simply isn't right. So that's what's been going on for the last decade or so, and that's my judgment about it. And around a year ago, Dad got another one of her Oh-I-can't-stand-that-we-never-talk letters, and he called me up and said, I got this letter. What do you think I should do? (He asks me this. It's not my favorite role, me as the parent to some extent. But when he does ask, he listens respectfully to the answer, which makes a world of difference.) He sounded like he was about out of patience, and I was about out of patience, and I said-- Dad, I can't advise you. I just can't help you with this any more. I've run out of energy on it, and it just makes me so angry that she's still doing this to you. Fine, you messed up, fine, you couldn't be the perfect father and the perfect mother at the same time while keeping us in bread and beans and protecting us from Mom's craziness. And if you were God, you could have done that. But she's coming up on 40 and she's way past the due date on forgiving your father for not being God. Everybody goes through a period of being angry about that: it's called adolescence. After that, you learn a little bit about real hardship, and you start being grateful that at least one of your parents is a decent human being. The way I see it, if she wants to commit her life to being tortured by this, neither of us can stop her. So I don't know what you should do. " Dad thought about this and wrote her a letter. I think the letter actually said something very much like the above. She responded without the usual theater. She called on the phone. He didn't send money. She called on the phone again anyway. She scheduled herself to come and visit. Things appear to actually be changing. Appear. I don't know. She did come and visit. It happened, through chance or serendipity or divine intervention or whatever, that, after she had bought her plane tickets, his doctor discovered that he had a heart problem requiring immediate surgery. So while she was here, he went into the hospital. I think this was really good timing. I mean, I think it made her directly aware for the first time that he is not this huge invulnerable person, but a real human who you have to give some care to. (Also, the surgery went very well and he is now just fine.) So. All that was eight months ago. In the meantime we've had one little episode where she basically wrote him a letter suggesting that he should be worried about my mental state because I was reacting negatively to her attempts to explain my feelings to me. Dad may not be all that comfortable articulating his feelings, but he is a professional and familiar with codes of professional ethics, and he is not a stupid man. I pointed out to him that 1) there is not a branch of psychology in the world that would consider it ethical for her to try to treat me 2) she knows this 3) it being 'unhealthy' for me to know this doesn't seem very logical. And as far as I can tell, that more or less put a stop to that. Or maybe it just inspired her to do something sneakier that I don't know about. It's quite a puzzling situation: she's spent most of her life simultaneously reviling this man and demanding his love. She's never expressed jealousy of my relationship with him --- just amazement that I can get along with such an awful person. I don't think she has some long-standing wish to sabotage my relationship with him, or not much of one. But as far as I can tell, the only way she really knows to feel powerful and safe from rejection is to get into the role of a therapist, where it's her JOB to break through other people's defenses-- that is, where if the person you're dealing with sets up a boundary, you get to define it as " resistance " and treat its existence as a pathology. So it's almost as though she can't feel close to him unless she's either treating him, or collaborating with him on treating someone else. Without a patient, there can be no relationship. I think there are a lot of therapists who are great people who do terrific work -- just like there are a lot of policemen who are really in the job because they care about peace and justice. I also think there are policemen who are in the job because they want to beat people and lock them in cages. And I think there are people who become therapists because they want the chance to violate the boundaries of patients who are emotionally defenceless. The idea that my sister has grown up to be one of them has occurred to me more than once, and, needless to say, it's pretty unattractive. My best guess -- and it's very much a guess -- is that she has started to do that, and realized what was happening, and she's trying to find another way to be. But going into " therapist " gear when it isn't appropriate is one of her fleas. A great honking flea. A tick. And she does it when something frightens her, and people she loves frighten her. Having grown up the way I did, I find any claim -- by anybody -- to understand me very alarming. This has made it quite difficult (though not impossible) for me to find a therapist I could work with. Coming from her, it's definitely a trigger. So I need to be careful how I react. I also have to remember, of course, that it's quite possible -- in fact, quite common -- for a person to be both a really good therapist to his/her actual patients, and loopy as hell in personal relationships. Her actual professional competence, in situations where her professional competence comes into play, is not the issue. The issue is this weird blurring of work and family she seems to be doing, and how ai should deal with it. So that, ultimately, is my question: does anybody have experience with a situation at all like this? Experience with high-functioning BPs becoming therapists? With KOs becoming therapists? Doing well? Doing badly? Any ideas on this? Thanks for your patience with this long tale. Ivy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 18, 2004 Report Share Posted November 18, 2004 Hi Ivy, Can relate to so much of what you wrote. Don't think my brother is high-functioning BPD though, more of a know it all gifted underachiever! But to talk to him, he knows more than the lawyers, accountants, doctors but his life is so messed up. I don't know how he rationalizes this. Actually, I'm hoping he's not high-functioning because than I think he would be more dangerous. But the dynamics of our relationships are so similar. Why can't they just appreciate the moments spent together? If it's not some heavy, intense, dramatic, emotionally draining encounter, they think there was no connection or something? Do you think that's what makes them feel abandoned? Also, love the God analogy because that's exactly the expectation. Nothing is good enough, perfect enough and it never will be cause gosh darn it your only human. Sorry I can't answer any of your questions though but I really enjoyed reading this!!! cntbreathe > > So. Here we are in the year 2004. Dad is living in the northwest > with his lovely wife, and Mom is living in Oklahoma with her passive > but apparently decent husband. I've barely spoken with Mom in the > past 15 years, other than fending off the occasional suicide FOG. I > see Dad & his sweetie often, and talk with them oftener. > > In the past couple of decades I have sort of adopted Dad's second > wife, if not exactly as a mother (I was, after all, 16 and in no mood > to trust female adults when we met) then as a kind of much-loved > honorary aunt. She sends me recipies, and advises me on what kind of > earrings to wear to job interviews. I go visit them and we sit > around in the evening drinking tea and we all tell each other lots of > useful information (the sign of love in nerdy families). No one > screams or says anything mean. They've been married for eighteen > years and frankly, I don't think he's over being startled by > happiness. He still seems mildly stunned. Everyone in this little > constellation is very quiet and undemonstrative, and quite content > with that. > > Since moving to Europe my sister has more or less dropped out of the > family, as far as we are concerned. She has also completely ignored > the grandparents, aunts, and uncles. The only person she > communicates with, as far as I am aware, is our mother. And as far > as I can tell (which may not be very far, you understand-- after all, > I haven't seen her much in the past twenty years) they talk on the > phone every week or so. As far as I can tell, she simply accepts > everything my mother tells her as the gospel truth. So she's not > getting much actual information as to what's up with the rest of us. > > When my mother and I had our last big confrontation, it was over a > suicide threat that she sent duplicates of -- and yes, I do mean > actual Xerox copies -- to me and to my sister. And I, as I said > before, basically gave her both barrels in response. I don't know > exactly how my sister reacted, either to the threat itself or to the > both-barrels response, because we didn't discuss the matter. The > only thing I actually know is that a short time afterward, Mom called > me up and explained, in tones of some self-righteousness, that she > had sent a copy of my response to my sister, THE THERAPIST, and they > had talked it over and agreed that the conflict was happening > because... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ...(Can anyone guess? Huh? Huh?) > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ...I have a lot of emotional problems and ought to be in treatment. > > Now, just to be clear: I don't know whether this actually happened. > I only know that my mother said it happened. I also know that after > that little gesture at having the last word, she went away and left > me alone. Usually she would not do that, so her doing it kind of > makes me think my sister did not make any such diagnosis. But I do > not know. And after that situation my sister dropped even more > completely off everyone's radar. (Enough so that, for example, a > college friend of hers emailed me to try and get a mailing address to > invite my sister to his wedding, and I had to tell him we didn't know > what town she was living in.) > > > While all this loopiness has been going on with me, sister, and Mom, > sister and Dad have had their own drama. This consists basically of > sister disappearing for months or years at a time, only to reappear > and make a sort of theatrical -- and usually tearful -- announcement > that she loves him very much and can't stand that they never talk and > she really wants to work everything out in their relationship if he > will only just try to understand how terribly he hurt her when she > was young and helpless and he yelled at her for not being able to > write... > > (this is of course ABSOLUTELY TRUE) > > ... and if he will just have a big emotional scene with her... > > (big emotional scenes being the thing he hates most on earth) > > ...it will all be resolved and they can live happily ever after. > > On which he, generally, consents to having the big emotional scene, > and probably does feel very moved and even perhaps sheds a tear > dicreetly into his handkercheif (there is always a neatly folded > handkerchief in his left hip pocket). And maybe he says that he > wants her to understand that he loves her. And more often than not > he sends her a semster's tuition. After which she disappears for a > year and a half, and the whole thing starts over. > > Through all this she has maintained a very clear conviction that she > wants a kind of relationship with my father where she can feel safe > and loved. And she will feel safe and loved only if she feels really > connected. And she will feel really connected only if he has long, > intense, passionate conversations with her about his feelings -- > something he simply is not going to do, or not directly. And she > isn't going to meet him halfway by trying to understand the > information-as-love code: she's going to take her feelings of > rejection ( " He just keeps distancing me by talking about botany! " ) > and cope with them by expressing negative judgments on his mental > health. She has a certain idea of how people express love, defined > around the way she would most like to receive it, and if he doesn't > do that, she's going to diagnose & label him as " unable to express > his feelings " . (Sort of like me going to Beijing and complaining > that the Chinese can't speak correctly. Evidence: I don't understand > them.) > > And now, in addition to all the belief in her own authority over the > world of feeling that she picked up as a split-good, feeling child, > she has a graduate degree to back her up. So she sets up a situation > where he is only allowed to show love by doing something that > basically makes him feel raped, and then passes judgment on him for > not being grateful that she's willing to take on the work of fixing > his head. It's a horrible situation. > > I should say, here, that I don't completely disagree with the idea > that Dad is unable to express his feelings, or with the idea that he > is emotionally damaged to some extent. I think he is -- or rather, I > think he has an unusually, and unfortunately, limited range of ways > that he can express himself. He is, to put it briefly, a painfully > shy man. This is a misfortune. It's also probably worse than it > might have been because ... he lived for 23 years with our mother > screaming at him from morning til night that he had no feelings, or > his feelings were wrong, and anyway he should just lose control so > she could feel powerful, and then he would be a real (=feeling) > person. I don't doubt that if he went into therapy, say with someone > who was experienced & skilled & NOT HIS DAUGHTER, the therapist would > say, " We need to help this man loosen up a little. " > > But being damaged under the circumstances is not surprising, and > being shy is in any case not a moral failing. And he has very freely > and generously acknowledged the mistakes he made when she was a > child, and apologized for them. More than once. So it's hard for me > to look at the pain she causes him and say, " She's the child in the > relationship, right? It's his job to come to her. " Because it seems > like what she's demanding is the caring & consideration that go with > being the child AND the power & authority that go with being the > parent. And that simply isn't right. > > > So that's what's been going on for the last decade or so, and that's > my judgment about it. And around a year ago, Dad got another one of > her Oh-I-can't-stand-that-we-never-talk letters, and he called me up > and said, I got this letter. What do you think I should do? (He > asks me this. It's not my favorite role, me as the parent to some > extent. But when he does ask, he listens respectfully to the answer, > which makes a world of difference.) He sounded like he was about out > of patience, and I was about out of patience, and I said-- Dad, I > can't advise you. I just can't help you with this any more. I've > run out of energy on it, and it just makes me so angry that she's > still doing this to you. Fine, you messed up, fine, you couldn't be > the perfect father and the perfect mother at the same time while > keeping us in bread and beans and protecting us from Mom's > craziness. And if you were God, you could have done that. But she's > coming up on 40 and she's way past the due date on forgiving your > father for not being God. Everybody goes through a period of being > angry about that: it's called adolescence. After that, you learn a > little bit about real hardship, and you start being grateful that at > least one of your parents is a decent human being. The way I see it, > if she wants to commit her life to being tortured by this, neither of > us can stop her. So I don't know what you should do. " > > Dad thought about this and wrote her a letter. I think the letter > actually said something very much like the above. She responded > without the usual theater. She called on the phone. He didn't send > money. She called on the phone again anyway. She scheduled herself > to come and visit. Things appear to actually be changing. Appear. > I don't know. > > She did come and visit. It happened, through chance or serendipity > or divine intervention or whatever, that, after she had bought her > plane tickets, his doctor discovered that he had a heart problem > requiring immediate surgery. So while she was here, he went into the > hospital. I think this was really good timing. I mean, I think it > made her directly aware for the first time that he is not this huge > invulnerable person, but a real human who you have to give some care > to. (Also, the surgery went very well and he is now just fine.) > > So. All that was eight months ago. In the meantime we've had one > little episode where she basically wrote him a letter suggesting that > he should be worried about my mental state because I was reacting > negatively to her attempts to explain my feelings to me. Dad may not > be all that comfortable articulating his feelings, but he is a > professional and familiar with codes of professional ethics, and he > is not a stupid man. I pointed out to him that > > 1) there is not a branch of psychology in the world that would > consider it ethical for her to try to treat me > > 2) she knows this > > 3) it being 'unhealthy' for me to know this doesn't seem very logical. > > And as far as I can tell, that more or less put a stop to that. Or > maybe it just inspired her to do something sneakier that I don't know > about. > > It's quite a puzzling situation: she's spent most of her life > simultaneously reviling this man and demanding his love. She's never > expressed jealousy of my relationship with him --- just amazement > that I can get along with such an awful person. I don't think she > has some long-standing wish to sabotage my relationship with him, or > not much of one. But as far as I can tell, the only way she really > knows to feel powerful and safe from rejection is to get into the > role of a therapist, where it's her JOB to break through other > people's defenses-- that is, where if the person you're dealing with > sets up a boundary, you get to define it as " resistance " and treat > its existence as a pathology. So it's almost as though she can't > feel close to him unless she's either treating him, or collaborating > with him on treating someone else. Without a patient, there can be > no relationship. > > I think there are a lot of therapists who are great people who do > terrific work -- just like there are a lot of policemen who are > really in the job because they care about peace and justice. I also > think there are policemen who are in the job because they want to > beat people and lock them in cages. And I think there are people who > become therapists because they want the chance to violate the > boundaries of patients who are emotionally defenceless. The idea that > my sister has grown up to be one of them has occurred to me more than > once, and, needless to say, it's pretty unattractive. > > My best guess -- and it's very much a guess -- is that she has > started to do that, and realized what was happening, and she's trying > to find another way to be. But going into " therapist " gear when it > isn't appropriate is one of her fleas. A great honking flea. A > tick. And she does it when something frightens her, and people she > loves frighten her. > > Having grown up the way I did, I find any claim -- by anybody -- to > understand me very alarming. This has made it quite difficult > (though not impossible) for me to find a therapist I could work > with. Coming from her, it's definitely a trigger. So I need to be > careful how I react. > > > I also have to remember, of course, that it's quite possible -- in > fact, quite common -- for a person to be both a really good therapist > to his/her actual patients, and loopy as hell in personal > relationships. Her actual professional competence, in situations > where her professional competence comes into play, is not the issue. > The issue is this weird blurring of work and family she seems to be > doing, and how ai should deal with it. > > > So that, ultimately, is my question: does anybody have experience > with a situation at all like this? Experience with high- functioning > BPs becoming therapists? With KOs becoming therapists? Doing well? > Doing badly? Any ideas on this? > > > Thanks for your patience with this long tale. > > Ivy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 18, 2004 Report Share Posted November 18, 2004 Heya Ivy, wow, what can I say... Thank you so much for sharing this story! I've really enjoyed reading it, and could relate to some parts of it too. Mainly, though, I admire your courage, and inner strength to have lived your life well, and to tell other people about it. It's been a hell of ride for you... > So that, ultimately, is my question: does anybody have experience > with a situation at all like this? Experience with high-functioning > BPs becoming therapists? With KOs becoming therapists? Doing well? > Doing badly? Any ideas on this? My nada was a therapist there for a while. She started off as a child psychologist and speech pathologist and worked very well and very successfully in the latter area for 5-6 years after the university. Then, by the time I was 10, she became more and more interested in adult psychology, went into an intensive therapy herself (heh... it cooled her down for all of 2 months afterwards! It's the only time I remember of feeling safe around her). Then she trained as a therapist, in a more traditional sense - Jungian school, I think - and ran some group therapy and individual sessions for a couple of years. The main trend with here was that she couldn't stick to any profession in her life, so I don't think she could've possibly continued to practice as a therapist for a long time. My nada is a bit of a thrill seeker like that, a child who needs new things to entertain her. However, I know that she was very good as a child psychologist, just from my memories of all the gifts that grateful parents brought her, big bouquets of flowers in the house and so on. Even if she exaggerated her abilities somewhat, I remember the physical evidence. As an adult therapist, I suspect that she was pretty good, possibly even talented. She was always able to pick up on peoples emotions and motives, to see under their skin. I don't know whether she respected their boundaries, or whether she subtly manipulated the clients into making her feel good about herself. I suspect that she could have become frighteningly good as a therapist, and possibly even would have got enough 'boost' from seeing the gratitude of the clients to keep her own insecurities out of the relationship. However, the money in out family became tight, and she changed jobs. (This was in the USSR in the last years before the collapse. Therapy simply didn't pay). Possibly she was also realising that, although protected by the therapists mantle, she was skirting the edge of exposure as a ... well, 'bad person'. (and we all know what that means for a BP!) For me, it was an unpleasant experience. Took me years to start trusting psychology and therapists after her experiments. She tried to analyse me quite a few times, told me who and what I was, gave me a pseudo-psychological reasons for my behaviour. It all sounded so very true (she was good at noticing things, though crap at seeing the reality), and scared me sh**less. She had the full backing of being a mother ('god-demon' as my recent shrink called it), and a psychologist... all I had was my own experience and a deep sense of waht was *really true*, of what was real for me. It created massive amounts of guilt, to contradict her like that, and pain from the conflict between trusting her and trusting myself. Thankfully, the deep sense of personal integrity pulled me through, but when I moved out of home it took me literally *years* of massive pain to weed out her interpretations of my life, to start trusting myself... and to mourn for the fact that I simply could *not* trust her. This last one really, really hurt. Sorry, got carried away there a bit. D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 18, 2004 Report Share Posted November 18, 2004 Heya Ivy, wow, what can I say... Thank you so much for sharing this story! I've really enjoyed reading it, and could relate to some parts of it too. Mainly, though, I admire your courage, and inner strength to have lived your life well, and to tell other people about it. It's been a hell of ride for you... > So that, ultimately, is my question: does anybody have experience > with a situation at all like this? Experience with high-functioning > BPs becoming therapists? With KOs becoming therapists? Doing well? > Doing badly? Any ideas on this? My nada was a therapist there for a while. She started off as a child psychologist and speech pathologist and worked very well and very successfully in the latter area for 5-6 years after the university. Then, by the time I was 10, she became more and more interested in adult psychology, went into an intensive therapy herself (heh... it cooled her down for all of 2 months afterwards! It's the only time I remember of feeling safe around her). Then she trained as a therapist, in a more traditional sense - Jungian school, I think - and ran some group therapy and individual sessions for a couple of years. The main trend with here was that she couldn't stick to any profession in her life, so I don't think she could've possibly continued to practice as a therapist for a long time. My nada is a bit of a thrill seeker like that, a child who needs new things to entertain her. However, I know that she was very good as a child psychologist, just from my memories of all the gifts that grateful parents brought her, big bouquets of flowers in the house and so on. Even if she exaggerated her abilities somewhat, I remember the physical evidence. As an adult therapist, I suspect that she was pretty good, possibly even talented. She was always able to pick up on peoples emotions and motives, to see under their skin. I don't know whether she respected their boundaries, or whether she subtly manipulated the clients into making her feel good about herself. I suspect that she could have become frighteningly good as a therapist, and possibly even would have got enough 'boost' from seeing the gratitude of the clients to keep her own insecurities out of the relationship. However, the money in out family became tight, and she changed jobs. (This was in the USSR in the last years before the collapse. Therapy simply didn't pay). Possibly she was also realising that, although protected by the therapists mantle, she was skirting the edge of exposure as a ... well, 'bad person'. (and we all know what that means for a BP!) For me, it was an unpleasant experience. Took me years to start trusting psychology and therapists after her experiments. She tried to analyse me quite a few times, told me who and what I was, gave me a pseudo-psychological reasons for my behaviour. It all sounded so very true (she was good at noticing things, though crap at seeing the reality), and scared me sh**less. She had the full backing of being a mother ('god-demon' as my recent shrink called it), and a psychologist... all I had was my own experience and a deep sense of waht was *really true*, of what was real for me. It created massive amounts of guilt, to contradict her like that, and pain from the conflict between trusting her and trusting myself. Thankfully, the deep sense of personal integrity pulled me through, but when I moved out of home it took me literally *years* of massive pain to weed out her interpretations of my life, to start trusting myself... and to mourn for the fact that I simply could *not* trust her. This last one really, really hurt. Sorry, got carried away there a bit. D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.