Guest guest Posted November 9, 2004 Report Share Posted November 9, 2004 Hi y'all, This kind of ties in with a couple of recent discussions on the board: links about how abused children learn to become super- sensitive to any signs of anger. Just came across a Salon.com article elaborating on a really interesting study I first heard about a coupe of years ago. Was one of the first things that helped me to see my own constant vigilance and assessing of everyone around me as a sign of the abuse (was still in the stage at that time of wondering whether I was exagerating nada's behaviour and being unfair to her). http://archive.salon.com/mwt/feature/2002/11/21/abuseq_a/ The study showed that abused children are super-sensitive and always on the lookout for signs of anger (=danger). http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2002/06/020618072601.htm Sort of sad reading but know it describes me perfectly for one. Also makes sense when I push that idea further to the way I express my own emotions. I think that when I'm not sure of my own emotions (negative ones) often identify and express them as anger rather than as something else. Nadine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 9, 2004 Report Share Posted November 9, 2004 Very interesting. I know so many times I misinterpret what people are saying because I don't like thier affect but actually when I thought about it later one woman was actually defending me, I just took her all wrong because of the look on her face. Scarry because I wonder if my Nada does this when I talk to her because I think the difference is when I'm removed from a situation I will self-exam what I may have contributed to the situation to make it go awry. Don't think BPD's are capable of doing that... cntbreathe > > Hi y'all, > > This kind of ties in with a couple of recent discussions on the > board: links about how abused children learn to become super- > sensitive to any signs of anger. > > Just came across a Salon.com article elaborating on a really > interesting study I first heard about a coupe of years ago. Was one > of the first things that helped me to see my own constant vigilance > and assessing of everyone around me as a sign of the abuse (was > still in the stage at that time of wondering whether I was > exagerating nada's behaviour and being unfair to her). > > http://archive.salon.com/mwt/feature/2002/11/21/abuseq_a/ > > The study showed that abused children are super-sensitive and always > on the lookout for signs of anger (=danger). > > http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2002/06/020618072601.htm > > Sort of sad reading but know it describes me perfectly for one. Also > makes sense when I push that idea further to the way I express my > own emotions. I think that when I'm not sure of my own emotions > (negative ones) often identify and express them as anger rather than > as something else. > > Nadine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 9, 2004 Report Share Posted November 9, 2004 Very interesting. I know so many times I misinterpret what people are saying because I don't like thier affect but actually when I thought about it later one woman was actually defending me, I just took her all wrong because of the look on her face. Scarry because I wonder if my Nada does this when I talk to her because I think the difference is when I'm removed from a situation I will self-exam what I may have contributed to the situation to make it go awry. Don't think BPD's are capable of doing that... cntbreathe > > Hi y'all, > > This kind of ties in with a couple of recent discussions on the > board: links about how abused children learn to become super- > sensitive to any signs of anger. > > Just came across a Salon.com article elaborating on a really > interesting study I first heard about a coupe of years ago. Was one > of the first things that helped me to see my own constant vigilance > and assessing of everyone around me as a sign of the abuse (was > still in the stage at that time of wondering whether I was > exagerating nada's behaviour and being unfair to her). > > http://archive.salon.com/mwt/feature/2002/11/21/abuseq_a/ > > The study showed that abused children are super-sensitive and always > on the lookout for signs of anger (=danger). > > http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2002/06/020618072601.htm > > Sort of sad reading but know it describes me perfectly for one. Also > makes sense when I push that idea further to the way I express my > own emotions. I think that when I'm not sure of my own emotions > (negative ones) often identify and express them as anger rather than > as something else. > > Nadine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 9, 2004 Report Share Posted November 9, 2004 > I just took her > all wrong because of the look on her face. I can't read faces or body language at all. I am hypervigilant, and I panic at somebody else's anger. Nada's facial expressions, gestures, words, and actions were inconsistent with each other, so I didn't learn that stuff that most people learn by the time they are 3. I don't know what to be looking out for. I think if I haven't been able to learn this in 60 years I am wasting my time to keep on trying. - Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.