Guest guest Posted April 3, 2004 Report Share Posted April 3, 2004 Hi chamirija, You're the chemist, right? I'm a visual artist. I share your facination with 'super realism'; I can get my head around things that do not alter the stability of what I KNOW. I was in art school about the time that abstract-everything was 'intelligent', and sophisticated...i. e. superior. I didn't 'get it', and thought there was something 'mechanical/inferior' about my preferred style. I eventually learned/understood that I disliked 'modern' art, particularly abstract, BECAUSE of the deliberate ambiguity; one has to 'interpret' elements - very much like hearing what nada did not say. Maybe that is why I love photography so; the camera is my witness. I'm experimenting now with optical illusions...brave step for me...in revealing my feelings through my art. All things pass...really. Carol In a message dated 4/3/04 2:38:10 PM Eastern Standard Time, chamirija@... writes: I would like to clarify what I meant by that: 'real' to me meant, objective, facts, no emotions...I do not want anyone to think I mean that poetry is not art...actually, it is true art, but I was just trying to illustrate where I am, and was... A good poet (a good artist) evokes an emotional response...strangely, I get an uncomfortable one from poetry, yet a strong, quite moving one from, say, a picture ---either super realism (I went with my uncle to an exhibit of Impressionists in 1991 at the Boston MFA, and was sooo bored...so I wondered into this gallery of " super-realism " paintings, and it was the first time art had literally taken my breath away!!!) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2004 Report Share Posted April 3, 2004 Hi chamirija, You're the chemist, right? I'm a visual artist. I share your facination with 'super realism'; I can get my head around things that do not alter the stability of what I KNOW. I was in art school about the time that abstract-everything was 'intelligent', and sophisticated...i. e. superior. I didn't 'get it', and thought there was something 'mechanical/inferior' about my preferred style. I eventually learned/understood that I disliked 'modern' art, particularly abstract, BECAUSE of the deliberate ambiguity; one has to 'interpret' elements - very much like hearing what nada did not say. Maybe that is why I love photography so; the camera is my witness. I'm experimenting now with optical illusions...brave step for me...in revealing my feelings through my art. All things pass...really. Carol In a message dated 4/3/04 2:38:10 PM Eastern Standard Time, chamirija@... writes: I would like to clarify what I meant by that: 'real' to me meant, objective, facts, no emotions...I do not want anyone to think I mean that poetry is not art...actually, it is true art, but I was just trying to illustrate where I am, and was... A good poet (a good artist) evokes an emotional response...strangely, I get an uncomfortable one from poetry, yet a strong, quite moving one from, say, a picture ---either super realism (I went with my uncle to an exhibit of Impressionists in 1991 at the Boston MFA, and was sooo bored...so I wondered into this gallery of " super-realism " paintings, and it was the first time art had literally taken my breath away!!!) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2004 Report Share Posted April 5, 2004 Hi Otwama, I was trained in graphic design, got worn out working in advertising. Went back after my fine arts/painting, sculpture and have been having fun ever since. I'm mesmerized by installation and performance art...one in particular called 'Cats', don't remember the artists name now, but she made dozens of models of cats in various poses around a room, wonderful. I am doing oil portraits now, really enjoying it. I keep my darkroom cluttered with projects, and still love photography. Playing around with multiple pinhole images, combinations with old family photos. Have never before been able to express through my artwork any of my foo/feelings but am feeling near that point. Lots of ideas coming. Glad to know another artist, Carol In a message dated 4/5/04 9:48:13 AM Eastern Daylight Time, otwoma2002@... writes: I am also a visual artist. I believe that the skills of problem-solving that I learned through art, helped me navigate my disfunctional BP parents. Those same skills helped me develop a feel for what was right for me as an artist. Performance and conceptual art were the trends when I was in school. I didn't care. I found a graduate school that would allow me to grow with-out making me a clone. I meet weekly with a guy who I see as an art coach. He crtiques my work, but lets me be me. I went to the Whitney biannual this week in NYC. There are SOOOOOO many types of artists and work out there. Art is truely a big tent. Bottom line is that it doesn't matter what part of the tent you camp in, but you have got to be good, and professional and JUSTIFY WHAT YOU DO. One big part of art is the self-marketing. That part is where many of us fail. My loss of my BP pseudo friend has made me find comfort in my work and it is IMHO the best work I have ever done. Take care. Otwoma getevenpersevere@... wrote: Hi chamirija, You're the chemist, right? I'm a visual artist. I share your facination with 'super realism'; I can get my head around things that do not alter the stability of what I KNOW. I was in art school about the time that abstract-everything was 'intelligent', and sophisticated...i. e. superior. I didn't 'get it', and thought there was something 'mechanical/inferior' about my preferred style. I eventually learned/understood that I disliked 'modern' art, particularly abstract, BECAUSE of the deliberate ambiguity; one has to 'interpret' elements - very much like hearing what nada did not say. Maybe that is why I love photography so; the camera is my witness. I'm experimenting now with optical illusions...brave step for me...in revealing my feelings through my art. All things pass...really. Carol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2004 Report Share Posted April 5, 2004 >> I went to the Whitney biannual this week in NYC. There are SOOOOOO many types of artists and work out there. Art is truely a big tent. Bottom line is that it doesn't matter what part of the tent you camp in, but you have got to be good, and professional and JUSTIFY WHAT YOU DO. One big part of art is the self-marketing. That part is where many of us fail. My loss of my BP pseudo friend has made me find comfort in my work and it is IMHO the best work I have ever done. Take care. > Otwoma Hi Otwoma Darn, iffin' I'd a known you was in town I'd a suggested we meet for a beverage. I have artist friends in the same situation...truely talented. But the self-marketing end of the equation holds 'em back. One of my pet projects has been setting up their stuff at small " under the radar " galleries. They get exposure and sales, I get a small comission but really it's a lot of fun or I wouldn't be doing it :=) Keep up the good work! liquid sunsh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.