Guest guest Posted January 11, 2005 Report Share Posted January 11, 2005 PLEASE! keep politics and religion stuff off this list. As I've posted previously, its against the WTO Guidelines and its very upsetting to some KOs on this list. Thank you, and don't shoot the messenger! - Edith List Manager / WelcomeToOz Family of NonBP Email Support Groups Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2005 Report Share Posted January 11, 2005 Dear Edith, > Thank you, and don't shoot the messenger! We would never do that. Sorry about all this. My fault, and won't happen again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2005 Report Share Posted January 11, 2005 --- Edith wrote: --------------------------------- PLEASE! keep politics and religion stuff off this list. As I've posted previously, its against the WTO Guidelines and its very upsetting to some KOs on this list. Thank you, and don't shoot the messenger! - Edith List Manager / WelcomeToOz Family of NonBP Email Support Groups I agree with this of course. Sorry if I caused it. I feel terrible! But it is a tricky one! Should I have kept my sexuality off the list too? It is pretty central to my journey so I kind of just let it out! It's just that I feel warm inside when someone is accepting of my lifestyle. Incidently my lifestyle is very " normal " , I harm no one and am NEVER political about wanting to be accepted. There is nothing obvious about me as a gay man. Only that I am sensitive - and I know a few straight men who are even more sensitive than I. Yet the funny thing is, my nada knew! As an adolescent, she would lecture me about how it would be a terrible sin and how miserable those people are! It was confusing as the " official " household perspective was liberal (in the British, non contentious sense of the word - perhaps I'll use the word tolerant from now on instead!). My grandma (more extreme in her BP traits than my nada) took it a step further and told me - when I was 9 or 10 - that I should have been born a girl. I found this very upsetting as I was a very masculine boy, thick-set, good at rugby and athletics and never identified with girly things at all. But she was - like my nada - almost psychically able to find the weak spots. I already felt a little different to other boys. The fact that I absolutely repressed my sexuality and ended up married to a BP who abused me systematically is something I hoped I could share on here, without inciting too much anger or hatred. I accept that some people will hate me for my lifestyle but I am naturally pleased when someone is accepting and tolerant. That's what I meant by saying that I was glad Di was liberal. And I raised the political perspective as a semantic illumination of how the word is used differently in my language. It was careless of me perhaps. I apologise! I have been very open on here and that has been incredible. The support I feel from reading kindness and compassion in the very open posts of all the KOs in support of each other is genuinely inspiring. I hope I haven't caused anyone any pain. I feel worried now that I have been stupid. Please forgive me. Phil Send questions and/or concerns to ModOasis-owner " Stop Walking on Eggshells, " a primer for non-BPs, can be ordered via 1-888-35-SHELL () and for the table of contents, go to: http://www.BPDCentral.com --------------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2005 Report Share Posted January 11, 2005 Sorry, Edith. We are an apologetic bunch, aren't we? I just get triggered more when I have done something bad and am reprimanded..that is worse to me than politics, religion, sexuality combined! I know you are just doing your job, but it kinda bites sometimes. Since we have to tiptoe around Nada, it just feels weird to be " in trouble. " I though that if we wrote " OT " on the posts we were okay. I will try to remember this next time. I am should-ing all over myself now : ( Di. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2005 Report Share Posted January 11, 2005 > I know you are just doing your job, but it kinda bites sometimes. > Since we have to tiptoe around Nada, it just feels weird to be " in > trouble. " Dear Di That was such a cool way of putting it. It made me smile. It does feel awful being " in trouble " but I don't think we are really. I started it anyway and I can plead newbie ignorance, being from another country and general tendencies to " say the wrong thing " by getting carried away! Sorry that I led you on. It hasn't stopped me posting which is good. I've gone the other way and posted miles too much!! Phil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 12, 2005 Report Share Posted January 12, 2005 > Thank you, and don't shoot the messenger! Edith, I am going to shoot you anyway. It seems to me that on this and other American lists, pro-liberal posts are banned but anti-liberal posts are tolerated. Pro-religion posts are banned but anti-religion posts are tolerated - even though it is the the liberal stereotype that is anti-religion. Banning anything which doesn't go over the line of abuse pushes my buttons. - Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 12, 2005 Report Share Posted January 12, 2005 Phil, your posting raised several ideas which are very interesting to me. You referred to the British meaning of " liberal " , and said that " tolerant " might be a better word. To me, as an American who learned more from books than from television, " liberal " means " tolerant " . I have had Americans label me as " liberal " and then direct hatred at me for it. I once lost a job because I objected to my boss saying " all the liberals should be killed " . I don't know what Americans mean any more by " liberal " , but I certainly don't identify with all the political stands of those who are commonly labeled " liberal " . I am willing to label myself " tolerant " , and go further than that to say I do not just tolerate diversity, I love and welcome it. In France " libéral " means favoring an unregulated free market. It has nothing to do with the American meaning. Your description of a BPD mother and grandmother in the context of homosexuality really got my attention. All my life I have suffered from BIID (Body Integrity Identity Disorder, the intense desire to become an amputee). I have been fighting this desire really hard, and have learned a lot about it. This hasn't helped me reduce the desire. Something like 40% of BIID sufferers are homosexual. Most of them, gay or straight, who are willing to share their childhood experiences, had a BPD mother. It is politically correct to believe that homosexuality is inborn, but I am really skeptical about that. I think that the congruence between homosexuality and BIID may provide a new way of understanding that. It is hard for me to imagine an inborn condition that would make me want to be one-legged, but I have found not one but many events in my early childhood that built that desire. Do you think that homosexuality could also be acquired in this way? If this relationship is true, maybe a treatment for BIID would also change homosexuality. However, there is no known treatment for BIID other than trying to live with the discomfort, or surgery. At this point I believe that both homosexuality and BIID are acquired, but once acquired, it is hard-wired and it is pointless and cruel to try to change it. - Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 12, 2005 Report Share Posted January 12, 2005 Dan wrote: >>Thank you, and don't shoot the messenger! > > Edith, I am going to shoot you anyway. Hi Dan, Sorry, but not on my watch! Like the Guidelines state, take it up with the list-owner. - Edith List Manager / WelcomeToOz Family of NonBP Email Support Groups Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 12, 2005 Report Share Posted January 12, 2005 --- Dan wrote: --------------------------------- > You referred to the British meaning of " liberal " , > and said that " tolerant " might be a better word. > It is politically correct to believe that > homosexuality is inborn, but I am really skeptical > about that. I think that the congruence > between homosexuality and BIID may provide a new > way of understanding that. It is hard for me to > imagine an inborn condition that would make me want > to be one- legged, but I have found not one but many > events in my early childhood that built that > desire. Do you think that homosexuality could also > be acquired in this way? ____________________________________________________ Dan It's nice to know that you see what I meant about being liberal and that my comments were more semantic than political. I was just celebrating Di's fabulous tolerance. She has made me smile so much from reading her posts these past days, I wanted to say that I was glad that she wasn't a dull conformist. Using the " L " word unfortunately was a bit reckless and perhaps I should have realised it despite the language barrier. I feel awful that I drew her into such a delicate topic and then too got pulled in. has been lifting my heart over and over this past week. She is amazing and I feel bad. Your other topic in your message is interesting to me. I think causes and effects are very hard to link up. The causality of my sexuality has been a subject of intense debate in my overactive mind for as long as I have known about sexuality at all. Was my nada's invasive and cruel treatment of me a factor? I don't know! She made me neurotic. That I do know. Is homosexuality the result of neurosis or is neurosis the result of homosexuality in an intolerant society? Research is going on into male and female brain development. Rather like left-handedness, the current thinking is that hormonal levels during pregnancy determine the male/female brain types. Homosexuals usually have predominantly female brains but not always. And many straight men have female brains too but are not gay. Another area of research involves studying homosexuality in animal populations. It is just as common in many higher functioning social species. It seems that homosexuality can be evolutionarily useful. Such males tend to bond with females MORE than the heterosexual males and are often involved in creating protective " home " environments for mothers and young. All of this points to its being a part of nature's plan (if nature has a plan!!). BIID is of course much less common than homosexuality and probably researched in very different ways. The link between them may be significant in some ways but I don't know anything about BIID so I cannot comment much really. I'd be interested to know more. Many people will argue that the two research areas mentioned above are purely designed to furnish liberal thinkers with justification for gay lifestyles. BIID might be a little harder to explain in such terms and is therefore seen as a disorder. But is it? We develop traits that help us to cope in a pretty crazy world. BIID could be a healthy expression of something. That said, I think I can begin to see what a struggle it must be for you. The question about all our choices must not be whether or not they are " natural " but whether or not some one is harming others because of them, whether or not the choice or in your case, the desire for that choice to be made, really feels like a choice at all. Quite simply, sometimes we are just the ways we are and rejection and intolerance are futile, cruel and very unhelpful. I have a history of risky behaviour in a sort of CPD ritualised form at times of intense stress. It was a secret. It sometimes caused me injury and was definitely something that had real potential negative consequences. Now that I am dealing with my issues (since therapy) and can attribute them to past events, I no longer indulge in that behaviour. It was definitely caused by my history of systematic physical punishment as a child. My homosexuality on the other hand has only become a stronger part of who I am as I loosen the grip of shame that has held me since childhood. So I tend not to think of my sexuality as something I need to get better from. I'm curious how your BIID might change in relation to dealing with the issues of having a BP parent. Did my nada make me gay? No! I don't think so. In fact, she made me straight; for years I repressed my true sexuality through fear of her treatment of me if I came out to her. I could be quite wrong though. Do male KOs often have homosexual tendencies? It's all very interesting but the main thing is – feel no shame! You are clearly a great person! And your BIID is part of what makes you who you are! Phil Send questions and/or concerns to ModOasis-owner " Stop Walking on Eggshells, " a primer for non-BPs, can be ordered via 1-888-35-SHELL () and for the table of contents, go to: http://www.BPDCentral.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 12, 2005 Report Share Posted January 12, 2005 Thanks for the kind words, Phil! Glad I could bring a little healthy laughter into your life! But darn it, now you have outed and I as liberal AND tolerant! : ) I always thought that my Nada was tolerant, and she was compared to most people, it seems. But as she has aged she has become less tolerant, most especially of different races. Sometimes I can't believe some of the things she says, especially in front of her black grandson. DUH! She seems to think that she can pick and chose who to be tolerant of...reminds me of a certain " head of state. " It is a huge anger trigger for me. Hmmm. I have my own rather interesting perspective of the " gay origins " . I have been fascinated by the recent (past 15 years) study of the human brain that shows differences in the brains of gay and straight men and men/women's brains. Also, there was a 20/20 or Primetime show recently about a set of female twins- one of which always felt she was a man and has since undergone gender transformation (?) surgery. I also have had the experience of dating (as a teenager) a young guy who is gay. He wasn't sure at the time, so I was his big experiment. Of course, neither of us thought the relationship was an experiment at the time. We are friends and laugh about it now. He was effeminate at the time so we joke that both of us had extremely poor gay-dar!We have had had long talks about this subject. Also, I know gay men who were not raised by Nada's- even raised in wonderful nurturing families with no outright trauma, so that theory doesn't gel for me. I think that the more we learn about genetics and the brain, the more fascinating we will all become! Here's a funny Nada thing- she divoriced my father when I was a toddler. He was banished from my life (maybe so I could share Nada's abandonment issues, lol). Nada admitted to me when I was a teen that she was worried that not having a father figure would make me a lesbian. She even asked my pediatrician about this " fear " when I was little. Oh, what a relief that must have been when I had a crush on Shaun Cassidy at 13! Lordy, how DO we all survive our parents, Nada's especially? Di. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 13, 2005 Report Share Posted January 13, 2005 Phil, Your comments give me a lot to think about. I appreciate it. I think you are right that if something like homosexuality is widespread over time, cultures, and even different species, it is a good guess that it is useful to the survival of the species even if we don't know why yet. BIID is a little harder to see. My therapist pointed out that a fox caught in a trap will chew off its leg, but a wolf usually will not. This is because a wolf has to be able to keep up with the pack to survive. In my case, I think it was a way of compartmentalizing a lot of bad stuff that could have destroyed me otherwise. In that way it is adaptive. I am very skeptical about this " male and female brain development " . If both brain types are found in both homosexual and heterosexual men, I think the simplest explanation is that the brain types are mislabeled and do not have to do with sexuality or gender, even if there is some statistical correlation. Because BIID is uncommon, it has been very little researched. I am probably one of three people in the world who know the most about it, and I don't know much. It was discovered accidentally in the 1970's during research on transgender. Literature and folk tales (even the Bible) give evidence that it has always been around. The internet is now making it visible for the first time, as people who suffered in isolation now have the ability to find out that they are not the only ones. I would say if a person is homosexual and contented to be that way, it is not a disorder. If a person has BIID and it is a pleasant fantasy that does not rule his life, then it is not a disorder. If a person has BIID and becomes an amputee and happily accepts the disability, then it is not a disorder. For me it is a disorder, because it occupies too much of my consciousness. I am hypersensitive about many things, simply because they trigger the BIID feelings to be too strong. If I were an amputee I don't believe I would be hypersensitive, because I would be happy to be what I am. But it is a lot harder to get from here to there than to adopt a homosexual lifestyle. And if I don't like it I can't go back. Things are going well for me now. I have come to grips with the fact that my mother was never there for me and never will be. My wife is back with me and we are getting along very well. She is respecting my boundaries, which has been a big problem in the past. I have taken up sport flying again and am starting to explore the Alps in a " trike " ultralight aircraft - one of my best dreams. During my childhood, I didn't believe I had the right to be happy or to have boundaries. BIID was my refuge from that. Now, the better things are, the stronger the BIID is because of that association. If I could have my leg off and be able to put it back on later, I would have it off today. I doubt I would ever put it on again. > It's all very interesting but the main thing is > – feel no shame! You are clearly a great person! > And your BIID is part of what makes you who you are! Thanks, Phil. I have been working very hard to reduce shame, and have largely succeeded. This reminds me of the film, " Starship Troopers " . An army recruiter, who is a triple amputee, tells recruits, " The army made me the man I am today " ! - Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 13, 2005 Report Share Posted January 13, 2005 > Also, I know gay men who were not raised > by Nada's- even raised in wonderful > nurturing families with no outright trauma, > so that theory doesn't gel for me. Di, I know gay men like that too. I also know people with BIID with a positive background. If a dysfunctional childhood is part of the explanation, it isn't all of it. - Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.