MRIs rather than clinical tests.

[Guest guest]

To the group:

I need some advice here. Maybe expert advice? In general, could evidence from before/after MRIs be assembled - in numbers too great to be statistically random - be used to prove cause and effect re: MS and LDN, be substituted for clinical trials to "prove" the effectiveness of LDN? It would surely cost a lot less. Maybe some of the money already raised to finance clinical trials could be given to a test group of MS patients to pay for their MRIs both before and after treatment. MRIs don't lie, or at least I presume they don't, and the MRI trials could be done at some institution whose integrity is unquestioned.

After all, as some have already mentioned, clinical trials have already been done for naltrexone, establishing toxicity, etc. Why repeat the whole trial? Other than that is what the drug companies want to force us to do.

Feedback will be appreciated.

Tom from Edmonton

_____________________________________________________________________ FREE Emoticons for your email! Click Here!