Guest guest Posted July 1, 2004 Report Share Posted July 1, 2004 Hey gang, With all this talk about box squats has got me going on this one. (Maybe it is because I'm about 5 weeks out of meet, to). For one, using a narrower box may not allow for the hips to completely " release " because your butt and hams are not completely on the surface of the box. Second, not that I'm a big fan of BFS or anything (in the past I had arguments with Kim Goss on this forum about him claiming that, " BFS was the best program for high school athletes bar none. " ) A high box squat may be in order when trying to develop RFD in that specific joint angle. This is something I also use when doing pulls, cleans , and snatches from the blocks and suspended bar suats in the rack. I feel this truly lends itself to building extaordinary starting strength for athletes who start in positions with " High " joint angles. I have yet to see a lineman or linebacker start to engage or run after a guy starting with their " ass to the grass. " There is a time to do full squats and lifts and there is a time to do partials especially for athletes requiring speed strength and starting strength. Thirdly, let's keep in mind that a correct box squat places more stress on the hams (allowing on to sit back futher than in a regular squat.) and it teaches explosiveness/ starting strength by dissapating the stretch reflex enough so that a violent " reflexing " of the prime movers occurs. You simply cannot do this with pause squats because there is alot of elastic energy stored in the hams, quads, and glutes even if the movement ceases. It is like stretching a rubberband, holding it, then letting it go rather than stretching it, releasing a little tension from it, then letting it go. The muscles must simply contract harder in the box squat where as one can rely on more elastic energy in the regular squat. Pete Arroyo Max Effort Training Systems Chicago, IL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 7, 2004 Report Share Posted July 7, 2004 It appears that box squats are somewhat fashionable at the moment. In the past I found I got good results with reps off pins set at my low position in the power rack. Philosophically I preferred the idea of not sitting with a large weight on my back. I also found it sorted out what I was doing in the bottom of a squat. Just throwing this in to get others opinions/ knowledge /experiences. Regards, Tim Goodsell Wollongong ,Australia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 9, 2004 Report Share Posted July 9, 2004 , Thanks you brought my main ? and concern with the relaxed box squat, the pressure that is placed on the spine. So thats the other question is benefit vs. risk. I think the toughest to deal with are the young people who would have a problem with relax the spine and allowing it to round while on the box. Lawrence Haltom City TX Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 9, 2004 Report Share Posted July 9, 2004 , I do have to agree with you on the lack of explosive reflex. But I would have to say that it will increase explosion, say for powerlifting when you are going for max poundage. Lawrence Haltom city tx " Dr. Yessis " wrote: > The first question I would like to ask is, why do box squats? I know > they're used to limit ROM but shouldn't the athlete learn this > kinesthetically when doing a squat which would be a more natural movement? > To say that the correct box squat places more stretch on the hams is also > questionable. Are you maintaining lumbar lordosis and why should the hips > go back further than in the regular squat? Does this movement make you more > explosive? Also, Pete states that " it teaches explosiveness/starting > strength by dissipating the stretch reflex... so that a > violent " reflexing... occurs. " How can this be? If you dissipate the > stretch reflex, how can you have a reflex action? It seems to me that pause > squats where there is a lot of elastic entergy would be more productive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 12, 2004 Report Share Posted July 12, 2004 Dr, Yessis, Did not mean to state " reflexing " as a reflexive action (or that dealing with reflexes). I meant for it to read " re-flexing " as in having to violently contract the muscles in order to explode off the box. I do know that the stretch reflex is not completely dissapated in this instance because one is completing/ starting the concentric portion of the lift after a slight pause/ break in the eccentric-concentric chain, within a short time period (under a second or so). Also, the lordodic curve MUST be maintined while sitting on the box in order to 1) maintsain the tension on the hams and 2) to protect the spine from major compressional forces. This is highly dependent on the flexibility of the individual. my major rule of thumb is to keep the depth of the box at the point just before the lordodic curve in the lower spine/ forward pelvic tilt occurs. Pete Arroyo Chicago, IL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.