Guest guest Posted January 18, 2004 Report Share Posted January 18, 2004 Dear group, While reading subsequent posts about vertical jumping strategies I have to say: 1. Vertical jump training is misunderstood. 2. Plyometrics are misunderstood. There also seems to be some confusion about " training for weaknesses " . Everyone here (I hope) is familiar with the teachings of dave tate & louie, who preach about the benefits of focusing your training on correcting weaknesses. I am completely in this camp. The problem is - when it comes to vertical jump - what are your weaknesses? How do you measure them and how do you correct them? In my own training & while helpig others I use a few simple tests which give a good idea of this: 1. A normal (counter-movement) vertical jump. Things to look for : a. depth of knee bend b. speed of reversal from eccentric-concentric c. time to completion d. position of hips/posture on takeoff (should be straight as a pole, perpendicular to the ground) e. position of arms on takeoff - (should be parallel to the ground at takeoff and then move up) 2. A static hold vj - this should be a 4 second static hold with the same angle at the knee that they used on the normal vj's - you start at say 90degrees, hold for 4 seconds (min) and jump with NO counter-movement. a. Do they perform a counter-movement (this shows they lack strength/coordination at that position and are relying on their plyo capability) b. Height differential between normal and static (if the static is very close or above (>95%) of the counter-movement jump, this means that subsequent training should focus on plyo capability. If it is less than this strength training is important. There are no strict numbers though. c. position of hips/body d. arm poosition e. time taken Of course, VJ is not really important -- as the most important thing is the actual biomechanics from the sport. This should be analysed correctly. There is also the same type of testing completed with squats ( both knees forward (high bar) and hips back), deads & good mornings with up to 3rm and 60% 1rm weights going for speed. Doing this testing you can see most of the motor qualities that are needed (and deficient) in the athlete. The secret to the training as you would expect is to continually test and re-evaluate the training methods. It is an iterative system: e.g. an athlete comes in the 70% sj/jj. We do weights & stop all plyos. The athlete re-tests and is 98% sj/vj. We concentrate on plyos until next testing... Etc etc etc. In the software world, this is a subset of a methodology called " agile development " which in a nutshell is basically a continual test-evaluate-improve cycle. There are probably errors in this, so don't hound me , its Monday morning and im buggered. Any questions? Joe Cole Dunedin, new zealand Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 30, 2004 Report Share Posted January 30, 2004 Joe, you bring up some very important factors involved in the vertical jump, most of which I agree with. However, I would like to make a few comments on factors with which I disagree. For example, there is always a counter movement before the jump. You cannot volitionally go into a concentric contraction before preparing the muscles eccentrically, even if it is only momentary and through a minimal range of motion. For example, even sprinters when they're in the blocks move the heel backward before they go forward. The same thing occurs in the vertical jump, you lower yourself before you go upward, but the amount of lowering is minimal. The more pronounced it is, the weaker the athlete is and this is where some training can be directed. As you bring out, vertical jump technique is very important. I have found that there is actually a sequence of actions involved in the jump from trunk extension to knee extension to ankle joint extension. The movements are sequential but yet overlap so that they are partially simultaneous. The greater the distinction, the more effective the jump. For a more detailed analysis of jump technique, I recommend my book, Explosive Running, where I have pictures and detailed descriptions of what takes place in effective jumping, which by the way, is the key to effective plyometrics. In regard to jump training, have you tried increasing strength while maintaining the same vertical jump height? You may find this more effective as you approach the competitive season. Doing strength work at this time without plyometrics usually leads to a decrease in jump height. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Yessis, Ph.D President, Sports Training, Inc. www.dryessis.com PO Box 460429 Escondido, CA 92046 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 3, 2004 Report Share Posted February 3, 2004 Can we please do less promoting of our books on these postings. Dassie, MS, CSCS Pleasanton, CA [The Supertraining list has a strict policy against blatant advertising or spamming, but I do not believe Dr. Yessis is guilty of this. There is a lot of information that cannot be conveyed across email, due to constraints of time and space. Suggesting that additional information can be found in his or any other resources does not break any ST list policies. JRG] Re: Vertical Jump Joe, you bring up some very important factors involved in the vertical jump, most of which I agree with. However, I would like to make a few comments on factors with which I disagree. For example, there is always a counter movement before the jump. You cannot volitionally go into a concentric contraction before preparing the muscles eccentrically, even if it is only momentary and through a minimal range of motion. For example, even sprinters when they're in the blocks move the heel backward before they go forward. The same thing occurs in the vertical jump, you lower yourself before you go upward, but the amount of lowering is minimal. The more pronounced it is, the weaker the athlete is and this is where some training can be directed. As you bring out, vertical jump technique is very important. I have found that there is actually a sequence of actions involved in the jump from trunk extension to knee extension to ankle joint extension. The movements are sequential but yet overlap so that they are partially simultaneous. The greater the distinction, the more effective the jump. For a more detailed analysis of jump technique, I recommend my book, Explosive Running, where I have pictures and detailed descriptions of what takes place in effective jumping, which by the way, is the key to effective plyometrics. In regard to jump training, have you tried increasing strength while maintaining the same vertical jump height? You may find this more effective as you approach the competitive season. Doing strength work at this time without plyometrics usually leads to a decrease in jump height. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Yessis, Ph.D President, Sports Training, Inc. www.dryessis.com PO Box 460429 Escondido, CA 92046 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Modify or cancel your subscription here: http://groups.yahoo.com/mygroups Don't forget to sign all letters with full name and city of residence if you wish them to be published! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 13, 2004 Report Share Posted February 13, 2004 I use the term " try " to maintain strength as you increase jump height because this is what I attempt to do when working with athletes in the precompetitive phase. It is at this time that they are doing high-intensity strength and explosive work. If the strength work is too great, there is a decrease in jump height, thus, adjustments are made constantly. In the general preparatory period when we do considerable strength work, there is always a decrease in jump height. This is to be expected. Increases in jump height will then come after this phase when we get into the explosive training period. We also make adjustments in jump technique, mainly because all increases in strength training change technique. Thus, adjustments are made to keep the jump height at its optimal. We do not work for additional gains in strength during the competitive period. The sport should be of sufficient intensity to maintain jump height and we do not want to interfere with technique. This is especially true of basketball and volleyball players who must also execute an action after the jump. Any significant changes in strength or jump height will show a difference in their ability to execute the actions needed not only in the jump but after the jump. If there are losses in strength, they go on a maintenance program to maintain their strength levels. For more details on my program, see Explosive Basketball Training. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Yessis, Ph.D President, Sports Training, Inc. www.dryessis.com PO Box 460429 Escondido, CA 92046 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Message: 8 > Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 12:23:50 +1300 > > Subject: Re: Vertical Jump > > Dr Yessis Says: > > >> Joe, you bring up some very important factors involved in the vertical > jump, most of which I agree with. However, I would like to make a few > comments on factors with which I disagree. For example, there is always > a counter movement before the jump. << > > Of course there is a counter movement in normal jumping, I didn't mean > to suggest that. But, from our video analysis, we have determined that > it is possible to learn NOT to use counter movement in vertical jump > testing. I believe that this is to be a learned process, and is very > useful for testing differences in " esd " or strength vs reactive ability. > That is all I use it for. > > >> " You cannot volitionally go into a concentric contraction before > preparing the muscles eccentrically, even if it is only momentary and > through a minimal range of motion. " << > > I agree there may be some - but from our videos we could not see any > when we used to test this. Of course there will be a minimal amount. > > >> As you bring out, vertical jump technique is very important. I have > found that there is actually a sequence of actions involved in the jump > from trunk extension to knee extension to ankle joint extension. The > movements are sequential but yet overlap so that they are partially > simultaneous. The greater the distinction, the more effective the jump. > For a more detailed analysis of jump technique, I recommend my book, > Explosive Running, where I have pictures and detailed descriptions of > what takes place in effective jumping, which by the way, is the key to > effective plyometrics.<< > > I have the book - I will take a look. > > >> In regard to jump training, have you tried increasing strength while > maintaining the same vertical jump height? You may find this more > effective as you approach the competitive season. Doing strength work > at this time without plyometrics usually leads to a decrease in jump > height. << > > Firstly, I do not understand how it is possible to " try " to maintain > your jump height - are you saying limiting performance? > > Jump training (all training for that matter) to me is all about > iteratively elminating your weaknesses based on continual testing & > evaluation of real-world performance measures. > > For some athletes, I have found that even in the competitive season they > gain marked jump height by performing the appropriate strength work > because that is their problem area. But its all about analysis and > intervention. If you can't analyse, its impossible to intervene > correctly. > > Joe Cole > Dunedin, New Zealand Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.