RE: Feedback desired on which Rife machine offers the best hope of curing Cancer

[Guest guest]

Marty,

Welcome

to the list. For what it’s worth, long ago when I used the Beck protocol,

I too ended up with very unpleasant itchy rashes. In any case, Beck units are not

optimal for eliminating cancer. Your confusion and caution about Rife frequency

devices, based on your observation that manufacturers all believe that their

units are the best ones, is understandable.

The

very abbreviated answer to your question about Royal Rife’s machines is

this: he focused on building radiant plasma tube devices that transmitted frequencies

via freestanding tubes that the subject did NOT hold. The contact (electrode)

devices came later, and were basically built by others for many reasons.

Due

to how Rife’s original equipment was constructed, people needed only

several minutes of treatment every third day. With modern equipment, however, especially

when dealing with cancer, longer periods (both session times and the duration

of therapy) are required.

Even

with certain limitations of modern equipment, Rife therapy is still quite

effective—although cancer requires more vigilance, more effort, and other

complementary modalities alongside of frequency therapy. My personal choice for

cancer would be a radiant plasma tube device.

There

is a lot to consider when selecting a unit. That, as well as the history,

theory and practice of Royal Rife’s equipment and modern-day units, are discussed

in depth in my Rife Handbook.

Best,

Nenah

Nenah

Sylver, PhD

author,

the NEW Rife Handbook (2011)

Holistic

Handbook of Sauna Therapy (2004)

VoiceBio

and Biomodulator certification

www.nenahsylver.com ; www.rifehandbook.com

===============================================

-----Original

Message-----

From: Rife [mailto:Rife ] On Behalf Of cancerbgone

Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2011 12:30 AM

To: Rife

Subject: Feedback desired on which Rife machine offers the best hope of

curing Cancer

Hello,

My

name is Marty and I am new to this group. My Mom was diagnosed with

Esophgeal Cancer almost one and a half years ago. At that time, the

Doctor believed my Mom only had a few months to live.

I

have spent the last 1 1/2 years attempting to learn as much as possible about

alternative means for curing this disease. A PET scan performed this past

July showed no spread of the Cancer and the activity was rated as mildly

hyperactive.

Until

recently I had been applying the Bob Beck Protocol. However, my Mom has

become extremely sensitive to the treatment complaining of itching and

pain. After treatment the area would become inflammed and scaley. I

have been forced to discontinue the electromedicine aspect of that treatment

and continue on with the administration of colloidal silver.

Through

my research I have observed that the cancertutor website gives a high

recommendation for the GB 4000. In addition, I was listening to the Coast

to Coast AM radio program where a guest had stated that his wife's breast

cancer had been cured using Rife technology. He gave praise to Jeff Garff for his knowledge of Rife technology and

his ability to back engineer Rife machines. I emailed the guest speaker

asking him which Rife machine did he recommend. At the top of his list of

recommended machines was the GB 4000.

Has

anyone had any success in treating Cancer with this particular model of

equipment? Would others also believe that the GB4000 is the best machinery

on the market? Can the modern day Rife machines truly cure Cancer?

In addition, is the SR 4 preferable to an M.O.P.A. plasma generator? I

saw written that Rife believed direct contact with the body was preferable over

a ray tube. Is this true? One site states that their belief is that

the enviornment has many frequencies that may interfere with the patient

receiving the Rife frequency through a plasma tube. My concern with

administering treatment through a direct contact is my Mom may develop irritation

from this also. I see there are devices that allow for the patient to

hold two cylinders. This may also pose a problem for a sick and elderly

patient especially if it is expected to be held for hours at a time. The

cancertutor site suggests two hours of treatment every day. Yet, my

readings on Rife stated that he treated patients every few days and only for

minutes at a time. Is that because his machines were so much powerful

than present day machines?

I

would appreciate help from anyone who can help clear up my confusion on the

topic. I hesitate to speak with representatives from any company as they

will attempt to sell me on their particular machine. An unbiased

assessment of the many options available would be helpful in establishing which

if any of the devices would be best for my Mom.

Thank

you for your anticipated feedback.

Sincerely,

Kincaid