Guest guest Posted June 21, 2005 Report Share Posted June 21, 2005 I have been researching pubmed and the entire internet and have came to one conclusion : not only does naltrexone work at low doses and boost the immune system, but it also works in high doses, even better. For example, this recent study on pubmed. You would think that since endorphins boost the immune system, that a blocker of them would be immunosupressive. It is just the opposite based on the conclusions of many pubmed studies (check for yourself) - naltrexone + immune search . What is happening is that endorphins boost the immune system only acutely but if they are chronically applied they actually are immunosupressive! (check pubmed again). Its because endorphins are relased during stress to boost the immune system but if they are constantly released (constant stress for example) either a tolerance to them is gained (and possibly reversed with naltrexone) and its likely that receptor binding downregulation occurs! So acutely, endorphins are good. Chronically they are bad for the immune system. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi? cmd=Retrieve & db=pubmed & dopt=Abstract & list_uids=15210757 & query_hl=78 " Naltrexone, an opioid antagonist, has been used in clinical trials to treat alcoholism. As the opioid peptides beta-endorphin and enkephalin increase splenic NK cell function in laboratory animals, it is anticipated that naltrexone treatment will cause immunosuppression. However, we report in this study that **chronic** naltrexone administration in laboratory rats **increases** the cytolytic activity of NK cells. It also prevents alcohol's suppressive effect on these cells. We identified that, in the splenocytes, delta opioid receptor expression is tightly controlled by negative feedback regulation of micro opioid receptors. Naltrexone disrupts this feedback control by reducing micro opioid receptor function, thereby **up-regulating delta opioid receptor binding, which results in an enhanced NK cell cytolytic response to delta opioid receptor ligands**. We conclude that naltrexone, which has been shown to be a promising agent for the clinical management of alcoholism, may have potential use in the treatment of immune deficiency in alcoholic and nonalcoholic patients. In addition it is reported MANY times on the net by doctors and is being explored as a fertility treatment. There is much ancedontal evidence that heroin addicts treated with normal dose naltrexone become pregnant much easier and get there menstrual cycles back. You would think if naltrexone was immunosupressive this would not occur. But in fact the people who take the high dose seem to be healthier! (immunoenhancement) There is even a study on pubmed saying that naltrexone (normal dose) should be studied for AIDS asap. There is a very simple explnation of this : As with any antagonist, your body will try to compensate by increasing receptor sites for binding. So either it is the blocking itself of the endorphins, or it is the sensitivity that changes. Its not quite clear. Anyways based on my research, naltrexone is actually immunopotentiating during chronic administration of high dose, and endorphins are only immunoenhancing in the short term, but chronically are immunosupressive. This was all found on pubmed.com Very cool stuff. Based on this I am going to test taking 4.5 3 times a day instead which would actually be blocking and unblocking the receptors constantly, something that will sort of rev-up Dr Bihari's idea. Yes during the day it works also - it did in the recent germany study, though i will still take the nightly dose. I imagine this will speed up receptor upregulation etc.. I will let everyone know the results but I am very confident this will be beneficial. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.