Re: conf. snippets/Kiki U wrote 9AM, shouldn't it be ...

[Guest guest]

> No , it is not a Typo. It was given at 9am in the German trial. They

> wanted to eliminate any insomnia and for all to be aware of the results while

> awake. Dr. Mir said if it works at all, they could see the results and they

> did see something on 30%. If it had been given at 9pm maybe te results would

> have been better but they would not be seen unless docs stayed up all night.

> They just needed to prove that something happens within 10 days so they can

> continue on to a bigger and difft. trial. Kiki

========

I was afraid they had done it at 9AM and I see it has already triggered

confusion on this forum making some think that they can take their LDN in the

AM.

[Guest guest]

Just for clarification--I wasn't thinking that I could actually benefit from an a.m. dose, but rather allow my body an opportunity to adjust to it before bedtime. In this manner, perhaps avoid the insomnia...Bren <TwisterAlley2@...> wrote:

> No , it is not a Typo. It was given at 9am in the German trial. They > wanted to eliminate any insomnia and for all to be aware of the results while > awake. Dr. Mir said if it works at all, they could see the results and they > did see something on 30%. If it had been given at 9pm maybe te results would > have been better but they would not be seen unless docs stayed up all night. > They just needed to prove that something happens within 10 days so they can > continue on to a bigger and difft. trial. Kiki========I was afraid they had done it at 9AM and I see it has already triggered confusion on this forum making some think that they can take their LDN in the AM.

__________________________________________________