Re: [rife-list] Molluscum Contagiosum frequency set?

[Guest guest]

Hi Fred, I hope that all is well with you apart from this virus. It's

been ages since we have heard from you.

I found: Molluscum Contagiosum: 0.11, 0.35, 0.80, 35.25, 72.50, 142.37,

271.50, 592.50, 725.68, 836.42

http://www.royalrife.com

> Last week my 3.5 year old son came down with " Molluscum Contagiosum " .

> My 2 year son is starting to get the symptoms.

>

> My frequency lists are old, and don't include this virus.

>

>

>

> ------------------------------------

>

>

[Guest guest]

--- Loyd wrote:

> Hi Fred, I hope that all is well with you apart from this virus.

Any advice on how to get a 3.5yo to listen to his mother and me,

and to not fight with his 2yo brother over toys?

> It's been ages since we have heard from you.

I built the equipment, figured out that it works, figured out

how to use it, and then discovered that most people would rather

die than try something that isn't recommended by a doctor.

Kind of took the wind out of my sails, so to speak.

> I found: Molluscum Contagiosum: 0.11, 0.35, 0.80, 35.25, 72.50,

> 142.37, 271.50, 592.50, 725.68, 836.42

Any advice on how to convert these frequencies to something

that will work with an older Bare/Rife device?

What I have are the two that I built back in the late 1990s,

using modified CB radios, and the frequency generators

recommended at that time. If I recall correctly,

none of the lower frequencies in your list will

actually work with my equipment.

We've been putting tea tree oil on the itchy bumps on my older son

for about 2 days, and my wife says that is helping.

I dug up some ozonated olive oil, and we're putting that

on part of his body (where we aren't using tea tree oil)

to see if that works as well as the tea tree oil.

Depending on the results of the above, sometime in the next day

or two, I'll dig the Rife/Bare devices out of storage,

and see about getting them to work again.

Did anyone ever figure out a way of checking if you have one that

works (rather than just having an expensive argon/neon light)?

If I recall correctly, the only way to test a device,

was to have a microscope+known type of bacteria,

and see if the Rife/Bare device killed the bacteria.

[Guest guest]

Hi Fred,

Regarding testing your Bare-Rife; there used to be a sort of

off-the-record test called the 802 test. I believe this is a freq for

e.coli, and the idea was to give yourself a minute of so exposure at 802

Hz, and see if you'd have to head for the bathroom within 30 minutes or

so. As I remember it worked well when I checked out my own plasma

machine years ago; I had one of Barry Allred's " tripple bubble " tubes.

HTH in some way.

Take care,

Malcolm

>

> --- Loyd wrote:

> > Hi Fred, I hope that all is well with you apart from this virus.

>

> Any advice on how to get a 3.5yo to listen to his mother and me,

> and to not fight with his 2yo brother over toys?

>

> > It's been ages since we have heard from you.

>

> I built the equipment, figured out that it works, figured out

> how to use it, and then discovered that most people would rather

> die than try something that isn't recommended by a doctor.

> Kind of took the wind out of my sails, so to speak.

>

> > I found: Molluscum Contagiosum: 0.11, 0.35, 0.80, 35.25, 72.50,

> > 142.37, 271.50, 592.50, 725.68, 836.42

>

> Any advice on how to convert these frequencies to something

> that will work with an older Bare/Rife device?

> What I have are the two that I built back in the late 1990s,

> using modified CB radios, and the frequency generators

> recommended at that time. If I recall correctly,

> none of the lower frequencies in your list will

> actually work with my equipment.

>

> We've been putting tea tree oil on the itchy bumps on my older son

> for about 2 days, and my wife says that is helping.

> I dug up some ozonated olive oil, and we're putting that

> on part of his body (where we aren't using tea tree oil)

> to see if that works as well as the tea tree oil.

>

> Depending on the results of the above, sometime in the next day

> or two, I'll dig the Rife/Bare devices out of storage,

> and see about getting them to work again.

> Did anyone ever figure out a way of checking if you have one that

> works (rather than just having an expensive argon/neon light)?

> If I recall correctly, the only way to test a device,

> was to have a microscope+known type of bacteria,

> and see if the Rife/Bare device killed the bacteria.

>

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Hi Fred,

I guess you do not need the frequencies now. The three lowest ones could

be multiplied by 2 over and over until they are high enough. Possibly

your frequency generators do not have resolution finer than 1 Hz.

http://www.royalrife.com

>

> --- Loyd wrote:

> > Hi Fred, I hope that all is well with you apart from this virus.

>

> Any advice on how to get a 3.5yo to listen to his mother and me,

> and to not fight with his 2yo brother over toys?

>

> > It's been ages since we have heard from you.

>

> I built the equipment, figured out that it works, figured out

> how to use it, and then discovered that most people would rather

> die than try something that isn't recommended by a doctor.

> Kind of took the wind out of my sails, so to speak.

>

> > I found: Molluscum Contagiosum: 0.11, 0.35, 0.80, 35.25, 72.50,

> > 142.37, 271.50, 592.50, 725.68, 836.42

>

> Any advice on how to convert these frequencies to something

> that will work with an older Bare/Rife device?

> What I have are the two that I built back in the late 1990s,

> using modified CB radios, and the frequency generators

> recommended at that time. If I recall correctly,

> none of the lower frequencies in your list will

> actually work with my equipment.

>

> We've been putting tea tree oil on the itchy bumps on my older son

> for about 2 days, and my wife says that is helping.

> I dug up some ozonated olive oil, and we're putting that

> on part of his body (where we aren't using tea tree oil)

> to see if that works as well as the tea tree oil.

>

> Depending on the results of the above, sometime in the next day

> or two, I'll dig the Rife/Bare devices out of storage,

> and see about getting them to work again.

> Did anyone ever figure out a way of checking if you have one that

> works (rather than just having an expensive argon/neon light)?

> If I recall correctly, the only way to test a device,

> was to have a microscope+known type of bacteria,

> and see if the Rife/Bare device killed the bacteria.

>

>