Guest guest Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 Some of my initial results show that the waveforms from the Biotec2000/BCX, GB4000, F165, are extremely similar - square with varying degrees of subtle distortion at varying frequencies. Slight variations in shape as well. The FScan2 ( circa 2005), puts out the cleanest square and sine waves of the group. It is actually cleaner than my HP8116A function generator up several MZ. Both the FScan and the F165 I tested were very susceptible to the RF from the plasma tube in the Bare Rife system and had to be distanced, RF choked, and shielded to work properly. Looking at all the units on a spectrum analyzer - a dedicated machine, not a usb adapter - shows square wave harmonics all over the place. This adds to the spate of additional harmonics seen in the spectrum analysis of the plasma tube output with any of these units as input devices. There seems to be a prevailing philosophy in Rife equipment builders that the harmonics are beneficial - or at least add to the possibility of finding an effective MOR for a given microbe or disease trigger. My personal feeling ( always open to modification ) is that specificity is the key to frequency effectiveness. I also have a hard time understanding why all the rife and clark frequency lists are so specific if thousands of simultaneous harmonics are also allegedly beneficial. Audio phase cancellations can block sound such as in noise cancelling headphones, so doesn't it follow that random harmonics may neutralize beneficial frequencies? Of course, certain harmonics will clearly add power to a given absolutely effective MOR. This is the double edged sword of optimizing these systems. I am considering a trip to Europe through the month of August to try to get first hand knowledge of all the frequency healing tools available - both in and out of the mainstream European medical community - sort of a " Healing Tool Technology Tour " . I would very much appreciate suggestions from this group as to where to go, who to contact, and what tools to focus on to maximize the benefits of the trip. I am very interested in testing an Ergonom 4000, and I will be bringing broadcast HD video gear with me to document the equipment that I find, and frequency effects on live cells whenever possible. Any one is free to email or call me to discuss my specific approach to this research or to share results. Letovsky Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.