Re: Too many off topic posts, let's get back to subject of LDN

[Guest guest]

Bren:

The major application of LDN is in MS, therefore it is reasonable

that most will discuss MS.

IMHO, it is incorrect to ask folks to not post on MS. Nobody has

prevented you from discussing any other application of LDN.

However, if what you say is true.. there are other forums where one

can move the LDN/MS discussion to. I am not sure the moderator would

want that..but since the issue bothers you, perhaps you might confirm

the issue with Dr.Gluck and let us know.

A

[Guest guest]

Sorry, it is easy to get off track. Back to the subject of LDN, DO YOU FIND IT TO BE TRUE FROM WHAT YOU KNOW ABOUT LDN, THAT IT STOPS EXACERBATIONS? SKIP SAYS HE HAS ONLY HEARD OF 3 PATIENTS WHO HAD A RELAPSE WHILE TAKING LDN. WHAT IS YOUR FEEDBACK ON THIS BRENDA? THANKS, KATHY

[low dose naltrexone] Too many off topic posts, let's get back to subject of LDN

Try to remember this is not an MS discussion forum. People with many diseases visit here. Take MS discussion behind the scenes to private e-mail.Thanks,

[Guest guest]

From: " kathy lintzenich " <mykittypaws@...>

Date: Sun Apr 24, 2005 6:54 pm

Subject: Re: Too many off topic posts, let's get back to subject

of LDN

does ANYONE KNOW OF CHATROOMS FOR ALTERNATIVE

DISCUSSIONS ABOUT MS.? I WOULD LIKE SOME POSITIVE, UPBEAT DISCUSSIONS AND

NO WHINERS IF YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN. HA HA. I DON'T WANT TO UPSET ANYONE

ON THIS SITE AND I TEND TO GET OFF TOPIC ABOUT LDN SOMETIMES SOOOO PLEASE

LET ME KNOW AEGIS. THANKS, KATHY

At the top left of the messages page on the LDN group web site there are

a number of links. Database, files, links........and CHAT. I have looked

at some of these links before, and it appears that none of them are

turned on for this group. If the moderator/owner of the group could turn

on the chat option, perhaps we could take some of the discussions off of

the message board.

I do sort of agree with whoever it was that said that since most of the

people using LDN are using it for MS, one has to expect off topic

posts having to do with MS. But I also understand the desire of some to

keep the discussions strictly on the topic of LDN. The daily digests

would certainly be shorter and easier to read if the off topic

discussions were taken somewhere else, but would that really serve

people's needs best? I honestly do not have an answer to that question.

One thing I will say is that most of the off topic discussions probably

benefit more than just one or two people, so taking them off the board

and going to individual emails would possibly be detrimental to others

who could benefit from the discussions. Labelling them as off topic would

certainly help, and we are often bad about doing that. And anyone who

doesn't like getting so many individual emails can change their

preferences to either receiving the daily digest or to checking the posts

online and not getting any emails at all. One way or the other, I do not

know of an easy solution to this problem.

Vali

[Guest guest]

--- In low dose naltrexone , " kathy lintzenich " <mykittypaws@a...>

wrote:

> Sorry, it is easy to get off track. Back to the subject of LDN, DO YOU FIND IT

TO BE TRUE FROM WHAT YOU KNOW ABOUT LDN, THAT IT STOPS EXACERBATIONS? SKIP SAYS

HE HAS ONLY HEARD OF 3 PATIENTS WHO HAD A RELAPSE WHILE TAKING LDN. WHAT IS YOUR

FEEDBACK ON THIS BRENDA? THANKS, KATHY

>

=========

I have seen very few develop new symptoms, never experienced before while on

LDN. Most were misdiagnosed.

I've seen many have pseudo exacerbations(a resurfacing or increase in old

symptoms). Many things can trigger pseudo exacerbations.

LDN cannot repair old damage already done. Why it's so important to start LDN

before your disease has time to do permanent damage.

[Guest guest]

mscured group of alternative things.. glyco friends also

Re: Too many off topic posts, let's get back to subject of LDN does ANYONE KNOW OF CHATROOMS FOR ALTERNATIVE DISCUSSIONS ABOUT MS.? I WOULD LIKE SOME POSITIVE, UPBEAT DISCUSSIONS AND NO WHINERS IF YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN. HA HA. I DON'T WANT TO UPSET ANYONE ON THIS SITE AND I TEND TO GET OFF TOPIC ABOUT LDN SOMETIMES SOOOO PLEASE LET ME KNOW AEGIS. THANKS, KATHYAt the top left of the messages page on the LDN group web site there are a number of links. Database, files, links........and CHAT. I have looked at some of these links before, and it appears that none of them are turned on for this group. If the moderator/owner of the group could turn on the chat option, perhaps we could take some of the discussions off of the message board. I do sort of agree with whoever it was that said that since most of the people using LDN are using it for MS, one has to expect off topic posts having to do with MS. But I also understand the desire of some to keep the discussions strictly on the topic of LDN. The daily digests would certainly be shorter and easier to read if the off topic discussions were taken somewhere else, but would that really serve people's needs best? I honestly do not have an answer to that question. One thing I will say is that most of the off topic discussions probably benefit more than just one or two people, so taking them off the board and going to individual emails would possibly be detrimental to others who could benefit from the discussions. Labelling them as off topic would certainly help, and we are often bad about doing that. And anyone who doesn't like getting so many individual emails can change their preferences to either receiving the daily digest or to checking the posts online and not getting any emails at all. One way or the other, I do not know of an easy solution to this problem.Vali

[Guest guest]

does ANYONE KNOW OF CHATROOMS FOR ALTERNATIVE DISCUSSIONS ABOUT MS.? I WOULD LIKE SOME POSITIVE, UPBEAT DISCUSSIONS AND NO WHINERS IF YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN. HA HA. I DON'T WANT TO UPSET ANYONE ON THIS SITE AND I TEND TO GET OFF TOPIC ABOUT LDN SOMETIMES SOOOO PLEASE LET ME KNOW AEGIS. THANKS, KATHY

[low dose naltrexone] Re: Too many off topic posts, let's get back to subject of LDN

Bren: The major application of LDN is in MS, therefore it is reasonable that most will discuss MS. IMHO, it is incorrect to ask folks to not post on MS. Nobody has prevented you from discussing any other application of LDN.However, if what you say is true.. there are other forums where one can move the LDN/MS discussion to. I am not sure the moderator would want that..but since the issue bothers you, perhaps you might confirm the issue with Dr.Gluck and let us know.A

[Guest guest]

--- In low dose naltrexone , " kathy lintzenich " <mykittypaws@a...>

wrote:

> Bren, from what you know , would you say a weak sensation in the left leg

which formerly was just a numb feeling in the calf just an increase in old

symptoms? I don't want to think I am having an attack on LDN. It seems to be

going away now after 4 days. Is this what you are calling a " pseudo

exacerbation " - something similar to my experience? I believe the 3.0 LDN has

helped me alot and still have that brand new bottle of 4.5 which seemed not to

agree with me. Perhaps I should give it one more try. What do you think? Thanks,

Kathy

>

===========

In the first 3 months on LDN one might experience many sensations from a

worsening of old symptoms, a waking up of nerves and sometimes experiencing old

symptoms in an almost rewind fashion.

Kathy sounds as though you have a temporary waking of some nerves.

What was 4.5mg doing to you?

[Guest guest]

Bren, from what you know , would you say a weak sensation in the left leg which formerly was just a numb feeling in the calf just an increase in old symptoms? I don't want to think I am having an attack on LDN. It seems to be going away now after 4 days. Is this what you are calling a "pseudo exacerbation"- something similar to my experience? I believe the 3.0 LDN has helped me alot and still have that brand new bottle of 4.5 which seemed not to agree with me. Perhaps I should give it one more try. What do you think? Thanks, Kathy

[low dose naltrexone] Re: Too many off topic posts, let's get back to subject of LDN

> Sorry, it is easy to get off track. Back to the subject of LDN, DO YOU FIND IT TO BE TRUE FROM WHAT YOU KNOW ABOUT LDN, THAT IT STOPS EXACERBATIONS? SKIP SAYS HE HAS ONLY HEARD OF 3 PATIENTS WHO HAD A RELAPSE WHILE TAKING LDN. WHAT IS YOUR FEEDBACK ON THIS BRENDA? THANKS, KATHY>=========I have seen very few develop new symptoms, never experienced before while on LDN. Most were misdiagnosed.I've seen many have pseudo exacerbations(a resurfacing or increase in old symptoms). Many things can trigger pseudo exacerbations. LDN cannot repair old damage already done. Why it's so important to start LDN before your disease has time to do permanent damage.

[Guest guest]

HI BREN, THE FIRST NIGHT ON SKIP'S 4.5 I HAD RAPID HEARTBEAT FOR A FEW SECONDS LIKE ANXIETY BUT I WASN'T ANXIOUS. I EXPECTED NO REACTION WHAT SO EVER. THEN I COULDN'T SLEEP AND KEPT WAKING UP. ON 3.0 I SLEEP LIKE A BABY. THE NEXT DAY AFTER THE 4.5 I FELT CLINICALLY DEPRESSEDAND HAD THIS MORBID FEELING OF SADNESS LIKE I WAS TOTALLY DEPLETED OF ANY EMOTION. I KNOW IT SOUNDS STRANGE BUT IS HARD TO DESCRIBE. THE NEXT NIGHT THE EXACT THING HAPPENED FOLLOWED BY ANOTHER DAY OF THE SAME. I WENT BACK TO MY 3.0 AFTER THAT ASSUMING IT WAS TOO STRONG FOR ME. KATHY

[low dose naltrexone] Re: Too many off topic posts, let's get back to subject of LDN

> Bren, from what you know , would you say a weak sensation in the left leg which formerly was just a numb feeling in the calf just an increase in old symptoms? I don't want to think I am having an attack on LDN. It seems to be going away now after 4 days. Is this what you are calling a "pseudo exacerbation"- something similar to my experience? I believe the 3.0 LDN has helped me alot and still have that brand new bottle of 4.5 which seemed not to agree with me. Perhaps I should give it one more try. What do you think? Thanks, Kathy>===========In the first 3 months on LDN one might experience many sensations from a worsening of old symptoms, a waking up of nerves and sometimes experiencing old symptoms in an almost rewind fashion.Kathy sounds as though you have a temporary waking of some nerves.What was 4.5mg doing to you?

[Guest guest]

I also agree that the off topic information is some of the best

information posted on here. I mean really how much information can

you post about LDN, the dosage and filler issue has been beat in to

the ground. Whats even more sad is two of the die hard LDNers(

& ) can't even agree on which is the correct filler. To me off

topic is way better then the 15 emails I had to read through

about " off topic " . I wish certain people on here wouldn't post so

much, it would be nice to get more of a sampling on peoples opinions

instead of always hearing from the same 4-5 people.

Joice

>

> At the top left of the messages page on the LDN group web site

there are a number of links. Database, files, links........and CHAT.

I have looked at some of these links before, and it appears that none

of them are turned on for this group. If the moderator/owner of the

group could turn on the chat option, perhaps we could take some of

the discussions off of the message board.

>

> I do sort of agree with whoever it was that said that since most

of the people using LDN are using it for MS, one has to expect off

topic posts having to do with MS. But I also understand the desire of

some to keep the discussions strictly on the topic of LDN. The daily

digests would certainly be shorter and easier to read if the off

topic discussions were taken somewhere else, but would that really

serve people's needs best? I honestly do not have an answer to that

question.

>

> One thing I will say is that most of the off topic discussions

probably benefit more than just one or two people, so taking them off

the board and going to individual emails would possibly be

detrimental to others who could benefit from the discussions.

Labelling them as off topic would certainly help, and we are often

bad about doing that. And anyone who doesn't like getting so many

individual emails can change their preferences to either receiving

the daily digest or to checking the posts online and not getting any

emails at all. One way or the other, I do not know of an easy

solution to this problem.

>

> Vali

>

>

>

> --------------------------------------------------------------------

----------

>

[Guest guest]

--- In low dose naltrexone , " ldnwatch826 " <ldnwatch826@y...>

wrote:

Whats even more sad is two of the die hard LDNers(

> & ) can't even agree on which is the correct filler. >

> Joice

==========

I post what Dr. Bihari believes is the best filler and that is Lactose and

that's straight from the horse's mouth. If someone cannot tolerate Lactose I

recommend Acidophilus or Avicel.

[Guest guest]

The Chemist Shoppe here in Grand Rapids just filled my first month's 3mg supply with the filler methylcellulose 70mg. What are people's impression/experience about this filler? [i asked the other day for feedback, and no-one answered. Is this because no-one had ever heard of this filler?]Rae

From: low dose naltrexone [mailto:low dose naltrexone ] On Behalf Of BrenSent: Monday, April 25, 2005 4:34 PMlow dose naltrexone Subject: [low dose naltrexone] Re: Too many off topic posts, let's get back to subject of LDN

Whats even more sad is two of the die hard LDNers( > & ) can't even agree on which is the correct filler. > > Joice==========I post what Dr. Bihari believes is the best filler and that is Lactose and that's straight from the horse's mouth. If someone cannot tolerate Lactose I recommend Acidophilus or Avicel.

[Guest guest]

I agree, the off topic info is important to me and keeps me abreast of anything new MS treatments.

Shucks, that's what I like about this group, they're on top of anything new and important that comes up re: MS.

Angie ;)ldnwatch826 <ldnwatch826@...> wrote:

I also agree that the off topic information is some of the best information posted on here. I mean really how much information can you post about LDN, the dosage and filler issue has been beat in to the ground. Whats even more sad is two of the die hard LDNers( & ) can't even agree on which is the correct filler. To me off topic is way better then the 15 emails I had to read through about "off topic". I wish certain people on here wouldn't post so much, it would be nice to get more of a sampling on peoples opinions instead of always hearing from the same 4-5 people.Joice> > At the top left of the messages page on the LDN group web site there are a number of links. Database, files, links........and CHAT. I have looked at some of these links before, and it

appears that none of them are turned on for this group. If the moderator/owner of the group could turn on the chat option, perhaps we could take some of the discussions off of the message board. > > I do sort of agree with whoever it was that said that since most of the people using LDN are using it for MS, one has to expect off topic posts having to do with MS. But I also understand the desire of some to keep the discussions strictly on the topic of LDN. The daily digests would certainly be shorter and easier to read if the off topic discussions were taken somewhere else, but would that really serve people's needs best? I honestly do not have an answer to that question. > > One thing I will say is that most of the off topic discussions probably benefit more than just one or two people, so taking them off the board and going to individual emails would possibly be detrimental

to others who could benefit from the discussions. Labelling them as off topic would certainly help, and we are often bad about doing that. And anyone who doesn't like getting so many individual emails can change their preferences to either receiving the daily digest or to checking the posts online and not getting any emails at all. One way or the other, I do not know of an easy solution to this problem.> > Vali> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------>

[Guest guest]

The amount of time wasted discussing filler is absolutely mind

boggling.. for it is not even important (though some will

vociferously disagree). It would appear that LDN is the only

medicine where the type of filler is more important than the drug!.

Americans chew tons of medicine every year.. have you ever heard of

the filler being an issue before ??. I havent. Unless one is

allergic to filler (extremely rare)..it really is a non-issue.

A

P.S. Not picking on anyone :-))

>

> I also agree that the off topic information is some of the best

> information posted on here. I mean really how much information

can

> you post about LDN, the dosage and filler issue has been beat in

to

> the ground. Whats even more sad is two of the die hard LDNers

(

> & ) can't even agree on which is the correct filler. To me

off

> topic is way better then the 15 emails I had to read through

> about " off topic " . I wish certain people on here wouldn't post so

> much, it would be nice to get more of a sampling on peoples

opinions

> instead of always hearing from the same 4-5 people.

>

> Joice

>

> >

> > At the top left of the messages page on the LDN group web site

> there are a number of links. Database, files, links........and

CHAT.

> I have looked at some of these links before, and it appears that

none

> of them are turned on for this group. If the moderator/owner of

the

> group could turn on the chat option, perhaps we could take some of

> the discussions off of the message board.

> >

> > I do sort of agree with whoever it was that said that since

most

> of the people using LDN are using it for MS, one has to expect

off

> topic posts having to do with MS. But I also understand the desire

of

> some to keep the discussions strictly on the topic of LDN. The

daily

> digests would certainly be shorter and easier to read if the off

> topic discussions were taken somewhere else, but would that really

> serve people's needs best? I honestly do not have an answer to

that

> question.

> >

> > One thing I will say is that most of the off topic discussions

> probably benefit more than just one or two people, so taking them

off

> the board and going to individual emails would possibly be

> detrimental to others who could benefit from the discussions.

> Labelling them as off topic would certainly help, and we are often

> bad about doing that. And anyone who doesn't like getting so many

> individual emails can change their preferences to either receiving

> the daily digest or to checking the posts online and not getting

any

> emails at all. One way or the other, I do not know of an easy

> solution to this problem.

> >

> > Vali

> >

> >

> >

> > -----------------------------------------------------------------

---

> ----------

> >

[Guest guest]

It does appear to make a difference to many people on LDN as I have noted

over the past 7 months. It is important to share this information with

others on LDN, as when they discover problems, they have something to rule

out.

Aletha

[low dose naltrexone] Re: Too many off topic posts, let's get back to

subject of LDN

>

>

> The amount of time wasted discussing filler is absolutely mind

> boggling.. for it is not even important (though some will

> vociferously disagree). It would appear that LDN is the only

> medicine where the type of filler is more important than the drug!.

> Americans chew tons of medicine every year.. have you ever heard of

> the filler being an issue before ??. I havent. Unless one is

> allergic to filler (extremely rare)..it really is a non-issue.

>

> A

> P.S. Not picking on anyone :-))

>

>

>>

>> I also agree that the off topic information is some of the best

>> information posted on here. I mean really how much information

> can

>> you post about LDN, the dosage and filler issue has been beat in

> to

>> the ground. Whats even more sad is two of the die hard LDNers

> (

>> & ) can't even agree on which is the correct filler. To me

> off

>> topic is way better then the 15 emails I had to read through

>> about " off topic " . I wish certain people on here wouldn't post so

>> much, it would be nice to get more of a sampling on peoples

> opinions

>> instead of always hearing from the same 4-5 people.

>>

>> Joice

>>

>> >

>> > At the top left of the messages page on the LDN group web site

>> there are a number of links. Database, files, links........and

> CHAT.

>> I have looked at some of these links before, and it appears that

> none

>> of them are turned on for this group. If the moderator/owner of

> the

>> group could turn on the chat option, perhaps we could take some of

>> the discussions off of the message board.

>> >

>> > I do sort of agree with whoever it was that said that since

> most

>> of the people using LDN are using it for MS, one has to expect

> off

>> topic posts having to do with MS. But I also understand the desire

> of

>> some to keep the discussions strictly on the topic of LDN. The

> daily

>> digests would certainly be shorter and easier to read if the off

>> topic discussions were taken somewhere else, but would that really

>> serve people's needs best? I honestly do not have an answer to

> that

>> question.

>> >

>> > One thing I will say is that most of the off topic discussions

>> probably benefit more than just one or two people, so taking them

> off

>> the board and going to individual emails would possibly be

>> detrimental to others who could benefit from the discussions.

>> Labelling them as off topic would certainly help, and we are often

>> bad about doing that. And anyone who doesn't like getting so many

>> individual emails can change their preferences to either receiving

>> the daily digest or to checking the posts online and not getting

> any

>> emails at all. One way or the other, I do not know of an easy

>> solution to this problem.

>> >

>> > Vali

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> > -----------------------------------------------------------------

> ---

>> ----------

>> >

[Guest guest]

I keep hearing stories from people whose medications that they have

been taking for many years are no longer working for them due to

changes in fillers and formulations. Some of this has been caused by

the mergers and closures of pharmaceutical companies and mfg

facilities. A thyroid drug, Tapizole mfg'd by King (I think) is one

such example.

The fillers in medications can make a big difference to many people.

Perhaps the file section of this forum could be used to post and

store information about fillers as well as other important LDN

information so that it doesn't have to keep getting repeated.

I think it is unfair to say that fillers are not important. To some

people they are.

> >

> > I also agree that the off topic information is some of the best

> > information posted on here. I mean really how much information

> can

> > you post about LDN, the dosage and filler issue has been beat in

> to

> > the ground. Whats even more sad is two of the die hard LDNers

> (

> > & ) can't even agree on which is the correct filler. To me

> off

> > topic is way better then the 15 emails I had to read through

> > about " off topic " . I wish certain people on here wouldn't post

so

> > much, it would be nice to get more of a sampling on peoples

> opinions

> > instead of always hearing from the same 4-5 people.

> >

> > Joice

> >

> > >

> > > At the top left of the messages page on the LDN group web

site

> > there are a number of links. Database, files, links........and

> CHAT.

> > I have looked at some of these links before, and it appears that

> none

> > of them are turned on for this group. If the moderator/owner of

> the

> > group could turn on the chat option, perhaps we could take some

of

> > the discussions off of the message board.

> > >

> > > I do sort of agree with whoever it was that said that since

> most

> > of the people using LDN are using it for MS, one has to expect

> off

> > topic posts having to do with MS. But I also understand the

desire

> of

> > some to keep the discussions strictly on the topic of LDN. The

> daily

> > digests would certainly be shorter and easier to read if the off

> > topic discussions were taken somewhere else, but would that

really

> > serve people's needs best? I honestly do not have an answer to

> that

> > question.

> > >

> > > One thing I will say is that most of the off topic

discussions

> > probably benefit more than just one or two people, so taking them

> off

> > the board and going to individual emails would possibly be

> > detrimental to others who could benefit from the discussions.

> > Labelling them as off topic would certainly help, and we are

often

> > bad about doing that. And anyone who doesn't like getting so many

> > individual emails can change their preferences to either

receiving

> > the daily digest or to checking the posts online and not getting

> any

> > emails at all. One way or the other, I do not know of an easy

> > solution to this problem.

> > >

> > > Vali

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------

-

> ---

> > ----------

> > >

[Guest guest]

>

> >

> > The amount of time wasted discussing filler is absolutely mind

> > boggling.. for it is not even important (though some will

> > vociferously disagree). It would appear that LDN is the only

> > medicine where the type of filler is more important than the drug!.

> > Americans chew tons of medicine every year.. have you ever heard of

> > the filler being an issue before ??. I havent. Unless one is

> > allergic to filler (extremely rare)..it really is a non-issue.

> >

> > A

> > P.S. Not picking on anyone

========

The filler IS just as important as the LDN when LDN is in capsule form. If the

filler does not agree with a patient LDN is worthless to that person because the

patient then cannot take LDN and if the filler becomes sustained release LDN is

worthless because LDN must release fast with a fast release filler. In most

medications one gets mainly medication and tiny amounts of filler but with LDN

we get mainly filler...a big difference.

[Guest guest]

< If the filler does not agree with a patient LDN is worthless to

that person because the patient then cannot take LDN and if the

filler becomes sustained release LDN is worthless because LDN must

release fast with a fast release filler. In most medications one gets

mainly medication and tiny amounts of filler but with LDN we get

mainly filler...a big difference.>

Let me try one more time..

" If the filler does not agree with a patient LDN is worthless " , There

is a big IF..these fillers have been used since ages... and the same

fillers are used everyday by thousands of patients.

" if the filler becomes sustained release LDN " .. The filler does not

become sustained release.. its LDN which becomes sustained release

because of excessive compaction of the tablet/capsule. Again this

does not happen very often, especially if the rapid release form has

been asked for.

Now to raise some hackles: Its time folks realized that LDN does NOT

work on ALL patients..and that the claimed 99% remission rate may be

inaccurate. Anybody who has been following this board, knows that LDN

has not worked on many patients. Once you recognize this insight..

you will stop doodling with the fillers as the excuse why LDN is not

working. I must however emphasize that LDN works in most MS

cases..but perhaps not at the claimed 99% rate. I anticipate that

this assertion of mine will be proven in a trial...and you heard it

here first.

A

[Guest guest]

Thank you, !

From: " kathy lintzenich " <mykittypaws@...>

Reply-low dose naltrexone

Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 13:30:49 -0700

<low dose naltrexone >

Subject: Re: [low dose naltrexone] Too many off topic posts, let's get back to subject of LDN

Sorry, it is easy to get off track. Back to the subject of LDN, DO YOU FIND IT TO BE TRUE FROM WHAT YOU KNOW ABOUT LDN, THAT IT STOPS EXACERBATIONS? SKIP SAYS HE HAS ONLY HEARD OF 3 PATIENTS WHO HAD A RELAPSE WHILE TAKING LDN. WHAT IS YOUR FEEDBACK ON THIS BRENDA? THANKS, KATHY

[low dose naltrexone] Too many off topic posts, let's get back to subject of LDN

Try to remember this is not an MS discussion forum. People with many diseases visit here. Take MS discussion behind the scenes to private e-mail.

Thanks,