Re: What a sorry lot - TOPIC NOW CLOSED!

[Guest guest]

Everyone,

I agree with Harvey and on this. This thread about Debbie has now gone far

enough and is now closed.

Debbie's questions have been answered and the discussion just degenerated from

there. If you have to discuss this further, do it privately and not via this

group.

Let us get on with more constructive topics.

Regards

Moderator

> > I see your post does not offer me any help for my dog, even though

> > when you needed it , I offered my help to you, for after all it was

> > for the greater good of all, but really, it was for the greater good

> > of your pocket wasn't it. And, a different? email address from you

> > again with not your real name on it. Thank you Char for your help.

> > The first post was not the one that mentioned you, I added that in

> > maybe the third? post to give more longevity to the time frame I was

> > involved in this, since no one replied to my mention of Monroe, Stan

> > or Frisco:) How much interest do you owe me compounded on the ?

> > amount of money I sent you, probably was enough for the life of one

> > small dog.

> >

> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------

> > *From:* soundtree01

> > *To:* Rife

> > *Sent:* Mon, September 6, 2010 5:58:54 PM

> > *Subject:* Re: What a sorry lot

> >

> > Hi Debbie,

> >

> > In trying to make peace, it seems that my comments have made things

> > worse?...

> >

> > It is sometimes difficult to get true intent across over email. When

> > the word " contribution " was used, some people on this group may have

> > had an impression it was larger amounts of money (i.e., " contribution "

> > might mean different things to different people); or even that I was

> > trying to take advantage. That was not the case, and I was just

> > trying to give other readers of this group a better background history

> > of what happened back in 1999. The comment about amount was not

> > directed at you personally, okay - and was not intended to imply

> > " small " . That's why I said of the contributions, " all of them

> > including yours was very much appreciated. " And later, that " many

> > hands make a large task small. "

> >

> > Also my comment about returning contributions was not intended to be

> > directed at you personally.

> >

> > Your very first post mentioned me (but did not mention Monroe), which

> > is why I tried to find out who you were. I thought it implied that I

> > had done something wrong or negligent somewhere along the line,

> > because it was all in the same sentence. I am sorry if I

> > misunderstood the intent of what you wrote in your first post. Then

> > when following up, I tried to discover if I had made an omission error

> > somewhere in my records...was just trying to do due diligence.

> >

> > Please Debbie, this gotten blown out of proportion. I am very sorry

> > if anything I said has offended you. I wish your efforts success, and

> > want to put this behind us.

> >

> > Best wishes,

> > Charlene

> >

> >

> >

> >

>