Guest guest Posted June 8, 2010 Report Share Posted June 8, 2010 there are videos out there on google video that show this live... . but nothing proven for viruses as far as i knowhttp://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-661201775015095955#http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQAQoUx2b_EFrom: lob exline To: Rife Sent: Mon, June 7, 2010 6:46:18 PMSubject: Rife Has anyone actually seen any Rife machine that really works on human infections. If you can direct me to one that I can purchase to prove it works on bacterial infection then i will pay $1,000 cash rewward to that person. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 8, 2010 Report Share Posted June 8, 2010  Dear Ahmad, Displays of blowing-up virus probably don't exist because we don't have a micro-scope that is capable of viewing live virus actions, and the effects of Rife frequency signals on them. I believe s micro-scope may be able to view live virus, but I haven't seen any demo's. Sincerely, Ken Uzzellhttp://heal-me.com.auHealMe FoundationA New Humanity Associate Rife Has anyone actually seen any Rife machine that really works on human infections. If you can direct me to one that I can purchase to prove it works on bacterial infection then i will pay $1,000 cash rewward to that person. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 9, 2010 Report Share Posted June 9, 2010 Oh yea i absolutely agree... i am not trying to discredit rife frequencies in any way.... its just that i am unhappy with the fact that the Universal microscope invented by royal rife was the only one that could have proven that... unfortunately no body knows where that is.... todays microscopes kill the sample that is being observed (the electron microscopes)To: Rife Sent: Wed, June 9, 2010 12:20:16 AMSubject: Re: Rife  Dear Ahmad, Displays of blowing-up virus probably don't exist because we don't have a micro-scope that is capable of viewing live virus actions, and the effects of Rife frequency signals on them. I believe s micro-scope may be able to view live virus, but I haven't seen any demo's. Sincerely, Ken Uzzellhttp://heal-me.com.auHealMe FoundationA New Humanity Associate Rife Has anyone actually seen any Rife machine that really works on human infections. If you can direct me to one that I can purchase to prove it works on bacterial infection then i will pay $1,000 cash rewward to that person. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 10, 2010 Report Share Posted June 10, 2010 Hi Ahmad, let me correct any misconceptions. 1. The original Rife Universal microscope is in good hands and is currently being restored. See: http://www.rife.de/new_historical_rife_documents.html 2. The German Ergonom microscope is commercially available and fully capable of viewing live viruses without staining or other processes harmful for biological material. We state an optical resolution of <100nm and in reality it is better than that. You can find online videos showing the capabilities on the Grayfield website. Sure it is not cheap, yet is comparable in price to other top range microscope systems like confocal, etc. I run Grayfield Optical Inc. which is dedicated to marketing these microscopes. http://www.grayfieldoptical.com We are working on a project to use the Ergonom microscope to reproduce Rife's work. For various reasons, we are a little behind on our schedule, yet we hope to get this project moving later this year if enough funding can be raised. 3. As to your initial question as to if a modern " Rife " (some prefer the acronym " R.I.F.E. " to avoid confusion with Rife's original equipment) unit can be used successfully on human infection. The simple answer is yes with the right equipment and the right frequencies. I have personally witnessed this many times as have many others here. As to proof, there is the Electromed double blind study that proves a positive effect on arthritis and there is a lot of research work over here in Europe (where the therapy is used legally) as well. You asked for direction so first of all you will find a list of popular units here: http://www.rifewiki.org/wiki/R.I.F.E_Machine_Table I have personally tried 3 units and they would all fulfil the job of treating infection. 1. Electromed PET. My first Rife device and I used it for years (still do). Worked well, but now no longer available to buy. 2. BioWave (ResIWave) pad device. Built in Germany and marketed all over Europe where it is fully certified. Lot of practicioners use them and thousands have been sold in Europe, particually in Germany. Very low pricing starting at about $370. Not very well known in the USA yet. 3. GB4000. This is well known in the USA and there are a lot of good reports about it. Powerful pad unit with lots of settings. May be confusing to use at first due to large range of settings. Very popular for use with Lyme disease. Prices are about $2000 or so (do not know offhand). There are others (see Wiki page above), I just listed the units I have had personal experience with. I suggest you join the Rife Forum where you will find a lot more specific information as a number of units have their own areas. http://www.rifeforum.com As regards finding the right frequencies to use. There is the CAFL frequency list, dnafrequencies.com and Nenah Sylvers excellent Rife Handbook: http://www.nenahsylver.com More info here: http://www.rifewiki.org/wiki/Frequencies Do I get my $1000 now :-) Regards Moderator > > Oh yea i absolutely agree... i am not trying to discredit rife frequencies in any way.... its just that i am unhappy with the fact that the Universal microscope invented by royal rife was the only one that could have proven that... unfortunately no body knows where that is.... todays microscopes kill the sample that is being observed (the electron microscopes) > > > > > > ________________________________ > > To: Rife > Sent: Wed, June 9, 2010 12:20:16 AM > Subject: Re: Rife > > >  > Dear Ahmad, > > Displays of blowing-up virus probably don't exist > because we don't have a micro-scope that is capable of viewing live virus > actions, and the effects of Rife frequency signals on them. > > I believe s micro-scope may be able > to view live virus, but I haven't seen any demo's. > > Sincerely, > > Ken Uzzell > http://heal-me.com.au > HealMe Foundation > A > New Humanity Associate > > > > Rife > > > > > >Has anyone actually seen any Rife machine that really works on human > > infections. If you can direct me to one that I can purchase to prove it > > works on bacterial infection then i will pay $1,000 cash rewward to that > > person. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 10, 2010 Report Share Posted June 10, 2010 --- rife_forum wrote: <snip> > 1. The original Rife Universal microscope is in good hands > and is currently being restored. > See: http://www.rife.de/new_historical_rife_documents.html <snip> Those photos of the Universal microscope were taken in the 1980s, when it was in the possession of Steve Ross of the World Research Foundation. Steve told me he had them taken before Crane took the microscope back. I've had copies of those same photos since 1995, which I had made from Steve's negatives when we went down to California to interview him. The way that Jimmie Holman and his colleagues at Pulsed Technologies present these photos, is suggestive, implying that they're current and represent work that is presently taking place on the microscope. This is very misleading. I personally also find it in bad taste for them to use them to promote their frequency generators, as if to say that there's some sort of connection between the two. That's just my personal opinion. Regards, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 10, 2010 Report Share Posted June 10, 2010 Since I talk to Barry Lynes on a regular basis I would like to add that Barry entered into a contractual agreement with the individual that now has the Universal microscope to repair and restore it. The man has violated this contract and it is going to take court action to get the microscope back. The idea that it is in good hands is not correct. The man has not repaired or restored it and is dishonest. He has been asked several times to return it but he refuses to do so. By any definition this makes him nothing more than a common thief. I would not want to be associated with this man because he will only tarnish the good name of anyone that works with him. Jeff > > <snip> > > 1. The original Rife Universal microscope is in good hands > > and is currently being restored. > > See: http://www.rife.de/new_historical_rife_documents.html > <snip> > > > Those photos of the Universal microscope were taken in the 1980s, when it was in the possession of Steve Ross of the World Research Foundation. Steve told me he had them taken before Crane took the microscope back. I've had copies of those same photos since 1995, which I had made from Steve's negatives when we went down to California to interview him. > > The way that Jimmie Holman and his colleagues at Pulsed Technologies present these photos, is suggestive, implying that they're current and represent work that is presently taking place on the microscope. This is very misleading. I personally also find it in bad taste for them to use them to promote their frequency generators, as if to say that there's some sort of connection between the two. That's just my personal opinion. > > Regards, > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 10, 2010 Report Share Posted June 10, 2010 I hope Mr. Lynes has a lawyer. He needs to sue promptly so that the man can't claim that he no longer has the microscope. If he uses an action called replevin he may be able to get the property back right away, before the trial. Since I talk to Barry Lynes on a regular basis I would like to add that Barry entered into a contractual agreement with the individual that now has the Universal microscope to repair and restore it. The man has violated this contract and it is going to take court action to get the microscope back. The idea that it is in good hands is not correct. The man has not repaired or restored it and is dishonest. He has been asked several times to return it but he refuses to do so. By any definition this makes him nothing more than a common thief. I would not want to be associated with this man because he will only tarnish the good name of anyone that works with him. Jeff > > <snip> > > 1. The original Rife Universal microscope is in good hands > > and is currently being restored. > > See: http://www.rife.de/new_historical_rife_documents.html > <snip> > > > Those photos of the Universal microscope were taken in the 1980s, when it was in the possession of Steve Ross of the World Research Foundation. Steve told me he had them taken before Crane took the microscope back. I've had copies of those same photos since 1995, which I had made from Steve's negatives when we went down to California to interview him. > > The way that Jimmie Holman and his colleagues at Pulsed Technologies present these photos, is suggestive, implying that they're current and represent work that is presently taking place on the microscope. This is very misleading. I personally also find it in bad taste for them to use them to promote their frequency generators, as if to say that there's some sort of connection between the two. That's just my personal opinion. > > Regards, > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 11, 2010 Report Share Posted June 11, 2010 There is no problem with Barry proving that he owns it. He purchased it from Crane for $25,000. When Crane tried to keep the microscope Barry took his contract to court and got a court order to take the microscope. Bedini was working with Crane at this time and two officers showed up at Bedini's office with a warrent and took the microsope. Bedini has talked many times about this event. Barry has no problems proving that he owns the Universal Microscope. Jeff Garff > > > > > > > > Since I talk to Barry Lynes on a regular basis I would like to add > > that Barry entered into a contractual agreement with the > > individual that now has the Universal microscope to repair and > > restore it. The man has violated this contract and it is going to > > take court action to get the microscope back. The idea that it is > > in good hands is not correct. The man has not repaired or restored > > it and is dishonest. He has been asked several times to return it > > but he refuses to do so. By any definition this makes him nothing > > more than a common thief. I would not want to be associated with > > this man because he will only tarnish the good name of anyone that > > works with him. > > > > Jeff > > > > --- In > > > > ._,___ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.