Re: Rifzap.... was: Multi-Wave-Oscillator ??

[Guest guest]

Hi Bob,

A FreX user put me onto a USB controlled and powered FG circuit. It would let

people produce a positive DC offset, 5 volts, sine wave only, to 85MHz. Not

being an electronic expert, its accuracy's and performance did perform better

than expected as listed in the error margins on their documents. It has three

good size crystal components mounted on the PCB, and I did test it and run it

through a " play with " version of FreX code :-) Which makes it the FG of choice

for doing resonance scanning upto 85MHz, after we perfect audio ranges first. My

instrument friend, Dan from Denmark says there will be many other applications

in other industry with such an instrument, a host of other applications exist

for resonance scanner beside the biologies. For biology, it could be the wholly

grail :-) We can only hope it is.

My 25HMz bandwidth amplifiers will produce good square waves to around 100kHz,

but then the square waves started to fall over in their fast rise and fall

times.

A signal conditioner circuit would have to be made to get awesome square waves

up at 3MHz which says is about the top of the pathogen cycle according to

Rife. Luckily, this also falls in Hulda s frequency range. Co-incidence ?

But when out puting 1,600,000 Hz do we need the harmonics with square waves, or

would sine wave be more appropiate to use? Amplifieing a sine wave at high

frequency is easier for my level of experience in electronics than making a

power square wave.

Once getting into these high frequency levels, then we have issues with new

frequencies that are found to actually cause disease. Like I would be nervous if

a user was running a high frequencey that had meaningful harmonics in the lower

400MHz range which is know to stimulate cancers. There has to be other high

frequencies that also negatively impact on our health and these haven't be found

yet, so the level of getting into trouble with frequency therapy is increased.

With 1 to 20,000Hz frequencies, even with high end squarers and amplifiers,

meanful harmonics die out around the 2MHz region, which gets us into and

Rife Synergy levels but keeps us out of unknown trouble.

FreX has its position as a Rife frequency therapy educational system that is

very good for new people wanting exposure in this therapy without outlaying the

gold, keep their pockets nice and safe and being responsibility for all the

different and unscientific things people do with potent electromagnet and

voltage transmission, so I have to try and make sure people don't get into

trouble with frequency therapy :-)

Jim, and others would not wish for people learning about this therapy

being exposed to high frequency tranmissions that haven't been throughly tested

and investitgate over decades of use as we have done with the audio levels. We

know alot about frequency therapy, but only the tip of the iceburg has been

found.

Careful Ken ... LOL

Rifzap.... was: Multi-Wave-Oscillator ??

hi Rino...

this isn't a MWO, rather it's a really neat looking PC software/hardware

combo clarke zapper/frequency device that will run freqs from 1- 60,000 with

a D.C. offset i suppose to clarke spec.

it appears the output from pc soundcard can be used, but that would limit

the freq range to that of the soundcard electronics. the plans show hookup

to printer port... is that capable of 60khz output??? if so, that's very

cool.

so, i wonder if the output device is the limiting factor in upper end of

freq range, or is it the LPT port output, or is it the software algorithm???

i assume the D.C. output is provided by the circuitry of the hardware

device? and is probably set by the value of the resistor?

Rino, have you seen the output of the device on a o'scope?

& have you noticed any good bodily effects from using it on yourself or

others using it?

now i wonder if Frex16 is limited in upper end of freq output by algorithm,

or can it be used with an LPT output to reach freqs outside the usual audio

spectrum up to the possible range of LPT (or serieal port) output? i would

guess the output device whether soundcard or LPT or serial would have to be

implemented by Frex programming... Ken, how about building this into Frex17

so we can have these higher freqs???

[Guest guest]

Dear Ken:

Could you give me the link where to purchase this USB controlled frequency

generator?

Jim Meissner

_____

From: Rife [mailto:Rife ] On Behalf Of Ken

Uzzell

Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 11:26 PM

To: Rife

Subject: Re: Rifzap.... was: Multi-Wave-Oscillator ??

Hi Bob,

A FreX user put me onto a USB controlled and powered FG circuit. It would

let people produce a positive DC offset, 5 volts, sine wave only, to 85MHz.

Not being an electronic expert, its accuracy's and performance did perform

better than expected as listed in the error margins on their documents. It

has three good size crystal components mounted on the PCB, and I did test it

and run it through a " play with " version of FreX code :-) Which makes it the

FG of choice for doing resonance scanning upto 85MHz, after we perfect audio

ranges first. My instrument friend, Dan from Denmark says there will be many

other applications in other industry with such an instrument, a host of

other applications exist for resonance scanner beside the biologies. For

biology, it could be the wholly grail :-) We can only hope it is.

My 25HMz bandwidth amplifiers will produce good square waves to around

100kHz, but then the square waves started to fall over in their fast rise

and fall times.

A signal conditioner circuit would have to be made to get awesome square

waves up at 3MHz which says is about the top of the pathogen cycle

according to Rife. Luckily, this also falls in Hulda s frequency range.

Co-incidence ?

But when out puting 1,600,000 Hz do we need the harmonics with square waves,

or would sine wave be more appropiate to use? Amplifieing a sine wave at

high frequency is easier for my level of experience in electronics than

making a power square wave.

Once getting into these high frequency levels, then we have issues with new

frequencies that are found to actually cause disease. Like I would be

nervous if a user was running a high frequencey that had meaningful

harmonics in the lower 400MHz range which is know to stimulate cancers.

There has to be other high frequencies that also negatively impact on our

health and these haven't be found yet, so the level of getting into trouble

with frequency therapy is increased.

With 1 to 20,000Hz frequencies, even with high end squarers and amplifiers,

meanful harmonics die out around the 2MHz region, which gets us into

and Rife Synergy levels but keeps us out of unknown trouble.

FreX has its position as a Rife frequency therapy educational system that is

very good for new people wanting exposure in this therapy without outlaying

the gold, keep their pockets nice and safe and being responsibility for all

the different and unscientific things people do with potent electromagnet

and voltage transmission, so I have to try and make sure people don't get

into trouble with frequency therapy :-)

Jim, and others would not wish for people learning about this therapy

being exposed to high frequency tranmissions that haven't been throughly

tested and investitgate over decades of use as we have done with the audio

levels. We know alot about frequency therapy, but only the tip of the

iceburg has been found.

Careful Ken ... LOL

Rifzap.... was: Multi-Wave-Oscillator ??

hi Rino...

this isn't a MWO, rather it's a really neat looking PC software/hardware

combo clarke zapper/frequency device that will run freqs from 1- 60,000 with

a D.C. offset i suppose to clarke spec.

it appears the output from pc soundcard can be used, but that would limit

the freq range to that of the soundcard electronics. the plans show hookup

to printer port... is that capable of 60khz output??? if so, that's very

cool.

so, i wonder if the output device is the limiting factor in upper end of

freq range, or is it the LPT port output, or is it the software algorithm???

i assume the D.C. output is provided by the circuitry of the hardware

device? and is probably set by the value of the resistor?

Rino, have you seen the output of the device on a o'scope?

& have you noticed any good bodily effects from using it on yourself or

others using it?

now i wonder if Frex16 is limited in upper end of freq output by algorithm,

or can it be used with an LPT output to reach freqs outside the usual audio

spectrum up to the possible range of LPT (or serieal port) output? i would

guess the output device whether soundcard or LPT or serial would have to be

implemented by Frex programming... Ken, how about building this into Frex17

so we can have these higher freqs???

[Guest guest]

Hi Bob, I'm very familiar with the osciloscope and I have tested the output wave

that is very clear and precise.

I also checked the software code and I have seen that is very clever, is not so

easy to mantain the up & down slope so stable...

The slope up and down is very stable and clear until 40Khz with my Centrino Duo

1.6Ghz.

In the worse case from 40Khz to 60Khz the wave will jitter a little due to CPU

load.

With Fourier transform we will have access to the Rife frequency.

Bye

Rino

> > >

> > > is anyone using a Multi-Wave-Oscillator on the group?

> > >  

> > > if so what kind?

> > >  

> > > are you seeing good results?

> > >  

> > > roger

>