Rife & cancer

[Guest guest]

In the case of Rife machines, I would consider it sufficient to just demonstrate

the MOR effect in vitro. We could extrapolate from there and do our own

personal therapy. The real problem is that we don't have any real, objectively

verified MORs. If someone reproduced Rife's in vitro work and found an MOR for

the so-called BX virus, I wouldn't wait around for approval or for the results

of a clinical trial before I tried it.

For other types of frequency machines, your proposal would be fine. We know

that this technology is in general, safe. We also know that the commonly

available machines in general, " work " . What people need to do is become better

versed in the technical specifications. We can also draw upon and extrapolate

from the vast amount of historical information from the early 20th century, when

electrotherapy was widely used.

The bottom line is that this is self care, and people should have an idea of

what they're doing if they choose to go down this road.

Regards,

--- Flaig wrote:

> Randy,

> I think you have accurately defined the situation, but have

> failed to recognize the solution. It is not necessary to get

> the FDA or AMA to agree that something is effective. And it

> is very unfortunate that people are left in the position of

> sifting through a lot of questionable anecdotal comments and

> buying whatever equipment they can afford. Let me provide a

> model by which the members of this Rife Group might be able

> to establish the efficacy of equipment and treatments and

> really contribute to science. 

> It is not difficult for the moderator to set up a database

> form to gather the necessary information to establish

> statistical measures of performance for equipment,

> condition, and treatment. After all how do you think the

> CAFL was generated? The relational database might have the

> following fields.

> Date, name, condition, condition validation, frequency

> equipment, frequency protocol, other items used (e.g, drugs,

> vitamins, etc.) at the same time, results, validation of

> results.

> Contributors would be able to list things that worked and

> things that didn't. After a sufficient number of inputs have

> been received the database can be analyzed statistically to

> determine which equipment is effective or ineffective and

> which frequencies and protocols seem to work best against

> specific problems.

> With this structured information the nature of this forum

> would change from a random walk to acquire knowledge into a

> organized one that will benefit the Rife community in

> general. Dr. Flaig