Guest guest Posted November 17, 2002 Report Share Posted November 17, 2002 Mel Siff writes: << The saying that a " chain is only as strong as its weakest link " certainly appears to be true in all rigid systems, but does it have to be qualified or re-stated if it contains a sequence of links some of which are rigid, non-rigid and fluidic? In such a case, the rigid elements are stronger than the non-rigid elements and much 'stronger' than the fluidic elements, so we are now compelled to examine how strength is defined in a " linked " system. >> Casler writes: If we wish to know how strength is " created, transmitted and absorbed " in a " linked " system, then yes. That is what I have been saying. That is what this " Kinetic Chain " stuff is all about. Examining the structures, parts, links, and functions of all these allows one to have a greater " visualization " of the process, and its capacity. As I look more into the ways to explain the understanding of why it is valuable to understand what is happening if they are closed or of they are open, has to do with the way the body responds and uses its dynamic and static linking capabilities to do such incredible things. The kinetic chains in swimming versus a clean and jerk are incredible and incredibly different in the way the body responds to and creates forces against outside forces as well as itself. Let me assure you, very few (outside of the higher end of Sports Science and Medicine) have had the opportunity to explore the Torso Stabilization Mechanism like I have. This journey of enlightenment still continues, and daily my awareness grows. [As someone who has been involved in the research and practice of torso kinesiology for several decades and has met hundreds of scientific and sporting experts in the same field both in the East and the West, I can only admit that *very many* have had those same opportunities - I only wish that my life were long enough to meet more of these researchers and practitioners. Mel Siff] Most of that awareness is triggered by being able to understand and visualize the functions and forces at play in the body. Perhaps as Jerry says I have developed a " keener " sense of certain concepts, but keeping them to myself will do no one but myself any good. If someone finds a concept or idea " enhancing " and another finds it " confusing " what should one do? Well either allow yourself to " absorb " the greater understanding and eliminate the confusion, or disregard it and remain " content " with what you already understand. I remember when I was a young kid in HS throwing the discus. I was strong and lifted weights with all the intensity I could muster. My coach kept demanding " put your hip into your throw " . I had absolutely NO IDEA what the heck he was talking about. What did my " hip " have to do with the discus I was throwing out of my hand? If I only knew then, what I know now. [if I only knew how little I knew then and how much more that I don't yet know!! Mel Siff] Regards, A. Casler TRI-VECTOR 3-D Force Systems Century City, CA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.