Guest guest Posted October 11, 2003 Report Share Posted October 11, 2003 here's a related article on celiac and when wheat is first introduced into an infant's diet: On Wheat and Weaning http://www.sciencenews.org/20020525/food.asp interesting that weaning time can have such a strong effect on the development of celiac disease in infantss. but i'd guess it would likely develop later in life for those infants who are genetically predisposed... Suze Fisher Lapdog Design, Inc. Web Design & Development http://members.bellatlantic.net/~vze3shjg Weston A. Price Foundation Chapter Leader, Mid Coast Maine http://www.westonaprice.org ---------------------------- " The diet-heart idea (the idea that saturated fats and cholesterol cause heart disease) is the greatest scientific deception of our times. " -- Mann, MD, former Professor of Medicine and Biochemistry at Vanderbilt University, Tennessee; heart disease researcher. The International Network of Cholesterol Skeptics <http://www.thincs.org> ---------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 11, 2003 Report Share Posted October 11, 2003 >On Wheat and Weaning ><http://www.sciencenews.org/20020525/food.asp>http://www.sciencenews.org/200205\ 25/food.asp > >interesting that weaning time can have such a strong effect on the >development of celiac disease in infantss. but i'd guess it would likely >develop later in life for those infants who are genetically predisposed... It is the same in rats, who are easier to study! Some babies are so sensitive they react to their mother's breast milk gluten (which REALLY SHOULD NOT be in the breast milk, BTW, the mother probably has leaky gut if that happens!). The lack of *diagnoses* makes everything very speculative at this point ... a lot of people live with the disease for 60 years or so and in this country, most are never diagnosed at all. ------------ Extended breastfeeding and a gradual introduction of gluten-containing cereals were independently protective, though breastfeeding’s benefit was roughly twice the magnitude of that from slowly introducing children to cereal. Together, these factors accounted for 45 percent of the risk of celiac disease among the Swedish children, the scientists saymeaning that almost half of the cases among the youngsters might have been prevented. Still to be answered, the scientists note, is whether those cases would have been eliminated or just postponed. ------------ This also makes me wonder at the effect of economic policies (structuring society so most women have to return to work shortly after childbirth, in jobs that make breastfeeding difficult) on social health. If extended breastfeeding protects against T1 diabetes, celiac, and a host of other illnesses, maybe we should be paying Mom's to stay home and be milk cows to SAVE MONEY in the health care system. I think Sweden is one of those countries where a Mom gets to stay home and enjoy her kid. Now THAT is a pro-family idea! -- Heidi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 11, 2003 Report Share Posted October 11, 2003 Could infant colic be a result of the nursing mother's leaky gut? This seems to make sense to me, especially if gluten is getting through to the infant. What do you think? Sheila > > >On Wheat and Weaning > ><http://www.sciencenews.org/20020525/food.asp>http://www.sciencenews. org/20020525/food.asp > > > >interesting that weaning time can have such a strong effect on the > >development of celiac disease in infantss. but i'd guess it would likely > >develop later in life for those infants who are genetically predisposed... > > It is the same in rats, who are easier to study! Some babies are > so sensitive they react to their mother's breast milk gluten (which > REALLY SHOULD NOT be in the breast milk, BTW, the mother probably > has leaky gut if that happens!). The lack of *diagnoses* makes > everything very speculative at this point ... a lot of people live with > the disease for 60 years or so and in this country, most are never > diagnosed at all. > > ------------ > Extended breastfeeding and a gradual introduction of gluten- containing cereals were independently protective, though breastfeeding's benefit was roughly twice the magnitude of that from slowly introducing children to cereal. Together, these factors accounted for 45 percent of the risk of celiac disease among the Swedish children, the scientists saymeaning that almost half of the cases among the youngsters might have been prevented. Still to be answered, the scientists note, is whether those cases would have been eliminated or just postponed. > ------------ > > This also makes me wonder at the effect of economic policies (structuring society > so most women have to return to work shortly after childbirth, in jobs that make breastfeeding difficult) on social health. If extended breastfeeding protects against T1 diabetes, celiac, and a host of other illnesses, maybe we should be paying Mom's to stay home and be milk cows to SAVE MONEY in the health care system. I think Sweden is one of those countries where a Mom gets to stay home and enjoy her kid. Now THAT is a pro-family idea! > > -- Heidi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 11, 2003 Report Share Posted October 11, 2003 Heidi Schuppenhauer wrote on Saturday, October 11, 2003 5:00 AM <<This also makes me wonder at the effect of economic policies (structuring society so most women have to return to work shortly after childbirth, in jobs that make breastfeeding difficult) on social health. If extended breastfeeding protects against T1 diabetes, celiac, and a host of other illnesses, maybe we should be paying Mom's to stay home and be milk cows to SAVE MONEY in the health care system. I think Sweden is one of those countries where a Mom gets to stay home and enjoy her kid. Now THAT is a pro-family idea!>> ----- many MANY years ago I lived in Holland... a young mother I knew was on a one year paid maternity leave @ 80% of her last salary before the birth.!!! here in the UK paid maternity leave is only 3 months... you can take another three months unpaid... not very encouraging. Dedy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 11, 2003 Report Share Posted October 11, 2003 >Could infant colic be a result of the nursing mother's leaky gut? >This seems to make sense to me, especially if gluten is getting >through to the infant. What do you think? >Sheila According to people on the celiac list, it happens. Some Moms got diagnosed because their baby got sick! I'd expect that if gluten gets through, so does a lot of other bad stuff though -- when the Mom stopped eating gluten probably the leaky gut stopped too, so I'm not sure what the baby would be reacting to, exactly. (and for those who want to start an argument here, I am NOT saying that this is the only cause of infant colic! I'm sure there are a ton of other reasons too). Which ALSO sets me to wondering about cow milk. If a grain-fed cow's stomach exhibits similar problems (getting smooth), do the cows get " leaky gut " too? If so, how does THAT affect the milk? This goes way beyond the issues of nutrient levels. Actually, for me, if the cow is getting wheat and has leaky gut, I'd be in the same boat as a kid with a celiac Mom ... which would mean maybe some of the " milk allergy " isn't to milk at all. Obviously I'm speculating here ... The gut-brain thing got me thinking too ... I'm pretty sure your gut knows what is " in there " and finding there is a whole semi-brain devoted to it makes sense. Does the gut-brain send back signals saying " don't eat this stuff " or " eat more of this " and change the appetite? How does it change the need for, say, seratonin if you are mainly only eating once a day? -- Heidi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 11, 2003 Report Share Posted October 11, 2003 >here in the UK paid maternity leave is only 3 months... you can take another three months unpaid... not very encouraging. > >Dedy Here in the US you can take 3 months off and they are supposed not to fire you. Back in the Paleoithic, you sat around camp and tanned hides or tied your baby to your back and went looking for herbs. A really good book -- " I should be glad of the pleasure of your company " -- has, in part, Sacajawea's take on the and expedition. Guessed, of course, but an intelligent guess. Going on a canoe trip with a newborn? No problem. Really, our whole idea of an " economy " doesn't make sense for how humans are made. It treats humans like little robots designed for the feed and caring of corporations. -- Heidi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 11, 2003 Report Share Posted October 11, 2003 >>>>>------------ Extended breastfeeding and a gradual introduction of gluten-containing cereals were independently protective, though breastfeeding’s benefit was roughly twice the magnitude of that from slowly introducing children to cereal. Together, these factors accounted for 45 percent of the risk of celiac disease among the Swedish children, the scientists saymeaning that almost half of the cases among the youngsters might have been prevented. Still to be answered, the scientists note, is whether those cases would have been eliminated or just postponed. ------------ ----->it would be interesting if someone followed these babies into adulthood to see if they developed celiac disease or T1 diabetes later on. Suze Fisher Lapdog Design, Inc. Web Design & Development http://members.bellatlantic.net/~vze3shjg Weston A. Price Foundation Chapter Leader, Mid Coast Maine http://www.westonaprice.org ---------------------------- “The diet-heart idea (the idea that saturated fats and cholesterol cause heart disease) is the greatest scientific deception of our times.” -- Mann, MD, former Professor of Medicine and Biochemistry at Vanderbilt University, Tennessee; heart disease researcher. The International Network of Cholesterol Skeptics <http://www.thincs.org> ---------------------------- RE: Science News and diabetes >On Wheat and Weaning ><http://www.sciencenews.org/20020525/food.asp>http://www.sciencenews.org/20 020525/food.asp > >interesting that weaning time can have such a strong effect on the >development of celiac disease in infantss. but i'd guess it would likely >develop later in life for those infants who are genetically predisposed... It is the same in rats, who are easier to study! Some babies are so sensitive they react to their mother's breast milk gluten (which REALLY SHOULD NOT be in the breast milk, BTW, the mother probably has leaky gut if that happens!). The lack of *diagnoses* makes everything very speculative at this point ... a lot of people live with the disease for 60 years or so and in this country, most are never diagnosed at all. ------------ Extended breastfeeding and a gradual introduction of gluten-containing cereals were independently protective, though breastfeeding’s benefit was roughly twice the magnitude of that from slowly introducing children to cereal. Together, these factors accounted for 45 percent of the risk of celiac disease among the Swedish children, the scientists saymeaning that almost half of the cases among the youngsters might have been prevented. Still to be answered, the scientists note, is whether those cases would have been eliminated or just postponed. ------------ This also makes me wonder at the effect of economic policies (structuring society so most women have to return to work shortly after childbirth, in jobs that make breastfeeding difficult) on social health. If extended breastfeeding protects against T1 diabetes, celiac, and a host of other illnesses, maybe we should be paying Mom's to stay home and be milk cows to SAVE MONEY in the health care system. I think Sweden is one of those countries where a Mom gets to stay home and enjoy her kid. Now THAT is a pro-family idea! -- Heidi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 11, 2003 Report Share Posted October 11, 2003 At 05:42 AM 10/11/2003, you wrote: >>>>>>------------ >Extended breastfeeding and a gradual introduction of gluten-containing >cereals were independently protective, though breastfeeding’s benefit was >roughly twice the magnitude of that from slowly introducing children to >cereal. Together, these factors accounted for 45 percent of the risk of >celiac disease among the Swedish children, the scientists saymeaning that >almost half of the cases among the youngsters might have been prevented. >Still to be answered, the scientists note, is whether those cases would have >been eliminated or just postponed. >------------ > >----->it would be interesting if someone followed these babies into >adulthood to see if they developed celiac disease or T1 diabetes later on. I agree. In rats, they found that if they stopped the gluten after a certain age and put them on a different diet that *fewer* developed T1 diabetes. It makes more sense to me to identify which kids are at risk and feed them sorghum. Celiac can be reversed, but once you lose your pancreas it is GONE. -- Heidi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.