Guest guest Posted July 16, 2012 Report Share Posted July 16, 2012 Begin page 11. It is interesting that no Chiropractic literature was used to develop these guidelines. Two were looked at both were excluded. Also, there was no DC external reviewer, no DC invited and no DC organization ie ACA etc ‘searched’ for material to use. The PTs and their organizations however, are all over. I know Vern helped to get SMT up at the top of non-pharmacologic care but it sure would be nice to see our resources deemed of sufficient quality being used and referenced. : http://www.oregon.gov/oha/OHPR/herc/docs/ebgs/glevalmgmlbp10-2011.pdf s. fuchs dc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.