Guest guest Posted April 24, 2012 Report Share Posted April 24, 2012 The excellent diagnostic skills of Dr. Wei notwithstanding, the imaging of ligament injuries in the upper cervical spine is controversial. The weight of the evidence indicates that injured tissue often cannot be distinguished from normal, thus calling into question the reasonableness and medical necessity of this procedure. The Bone and Joint Decade Task Force (Spine Volume 33, Number 4S, pp S101–S122) stated: The possible presence of demonstrable ligamentous injury to the upper cervical spine after whiplash exposure has been investigated with special sequence MRI. A phase I study (n = 30) showed that bright signals in the alar, transverse ligaments, and other structures have been observed more frequently in subjects with whiplash trauma exposure after 6 years (range, 2–9 years) than control subjects. However, the reliability of different observers in classifying the presence or degree of ligamentous injury, as shown by the MRI signal change, showed high variability. Validation of this finding as diagnosing bona fide, and clinically relevant ligamentous injury has not been demonstrated in these patients with WAD (grades I–III). They cited three articles by Krakenes, Kaale et al. Curiously, these researchers are about the only ones to purport validity for these imaging studies. The majority of studies indicate otherwise. Muhle et al (Rofo. 2002 Apr;174(4):416-22) discussed radiological aspects of the diagnosis of whiplash injuries. Although asymmetric dens position and widening of the atlantodental distance to > 12 mm are indirect signs of alar ligament rupture, best visualized on MRI, they state, " … changes of the alar ligaments on MRI must be differentiated from normal variants in healthy individuals. " Bitterling et al (Rofo. 2007 Nov;179(11):1127-36), reviewed studies on biomechanics, anatomical and clinical MR imaging. They found that " biomechanical experiments can not induce according injuries of alar ligaments. Although MRI provides excellent visualization of alar ligaments, the range of normal variants is high. " Furthermore, " … signal alterations of alar ligaments can hardly be differentiated from common normal variants, " and " functional MRI provides no diagnostic yield. " Myran et al (Spine. 2008 Aug 15;33(18):2012-6) performed a case-control study using MRI to assess signal intensity areas in the alar ligaments. 59 patients with persistent whiplash associated disorder Grade I-II after a car accident, 57 with chronic nontraumatic neck pain, and 57 without neck pain or previous neck trauma were compared. The alar ligaments were evaluated according to a 4-point grading scale. Alar ligament grades 0 to 3 were seen in all 3 diagnostic groups. Areas of high signal intensity (Grade 2-3) were found in at least one alar ligament in 49% of patients in the WAD Grade I-II group, in 33% of the chronic neck pain group, and in 40% of the controls. They concluded, " The previously reported assumption that these changes are due to a trauma itself is not supported by this study. The diagnostic value and the clinical relevance of magnetic resonance detectable areas of high intensity in the alar ligaments are questionable. " Respectfully, J. Burke, D.C. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.