Guest guest Posted April 24, 2012 Report Share Posted April 24, 2012 Group, Hypothetically speaking, if an Oregon DC wanted to evaluate the effectiveness of certain treatment methods using volunteers from his/her patient base, would that be okay to do? Are there special rules and regulations for this? In this hypothetical situation, there would be no intention to publish research, only improve in-office treatment protocols. The treatment would be done for free and the patient would sign an informed consent. Does anyone have any hypothetical thoughts or recommendations about this? Thanks, Jamey Dyson, DC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 26, 2012 Report Share Posted April 26, 2012 As long as you have informed consent you will meet a reasonable criteria.A control group would be very useful to determine the true effectiveness of a certain product or procedure.Dean , D.C.Portland, OR To: "Oregon DC's" <oregondcs >Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 4:37:41 PMSubject: In-office pilot studies Group, Hypothetically speaking, if an Oregon DC wanted to evaluate the effectiveness of certain treatment methods using volunteers from his/her patient base, would that be okay to do? Are there special rules and regulations for this? In this hypothetical situation, there would be no intention to publish research, only improve in-office treatment protocols. The treatment would be done for free and the patient would sign an informed consent. Does anyone have any hypothetical thoughts or recommendations about this? Thanks, Jamey Dyson, DC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 26, 2012 Report Share Posted April 26, 2012 If you think you might want to use the data at some time, an IRB would be needed The information contained in this electronic message may contain protected health information confidential under applicable law, and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the recipient of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copy or disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify Back In Motion Sports Injuries Clinic, LLC at 11385 SW Scholls Ferry Road, Beaverton, OR-97008. and purge the communication immediately without making any copy or distribution. From: oregondcs [mailto:oregondcs ] On Behalf Of drdeanclark@...Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 4:58 PMTo: Jamey DysonCc: Oregon DC'sSubject: Re: In-office pilot studies As long as you have informed consent you will meet a reasonable criteria.A control group would be very useful to determine the true effectiveness of a certain product or procedure.Dean , D.C.Portland, OR To: " Oregon DC's " <oregondcs >Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 4:37:41 PMSubject: In-office pilot studies Group,Hypothetically speaking, if an Oregon DC wanted to evaluate the effectiveness of certain treatment methods using volunteers from his/her patient base, would that be okay to do? Are there special rules and regulations for this? In this hypothetical situation, there would be no intention to publish research, only improve in-office treatment protocols. The treatment would be done for free and the patient would sign an informed consent. Does anyone have any hypothetical thoughts or recommendations about this?Thanks,Jamey Dyson, DC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 26, 2012 Report Share Posted April 26, 2012 May want to consider checking out the link for NIH human subject training: http://phrp.nihtraining.com/users/login.php UWS require docs participating in their studies to complete this. Bruce Chaser, D.C. hawthornewellness.com  From: "Jamey Dyson" To: "Oregon DC's" <oregondcs > Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 4:37:41 PM Subject: In-office pilot studies  Group, Hypothetically speaking, if an Oregon DC wanted to evaluate the effectiveness of certain treatment methods using volunteers from his/her patient base, would that be okay to do? Are there special rules and regulations for this? In this hypothetical situation, there would be no intention to publish research, only improve in-office treatment protocols. The treatment would be done for free and the patient would sign an informed consent. Does anyone have any hypothetical thoughts or recommendations about this? Thanks, Jamey Dyson, DC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.