RE: NCR verse Nasal Specific

[Guest guest]

Walter, 'Taking into account the respiratory component' is the piece that separates the technique from brutalness. When one respects the body's respiratory factors, parts move as on teflon, no longer requiring a jerk or forcefulness. NST approaches the nasal component solely while the NCR looks to the entire cranium. It is not possible to move one plate without dramatically affecting the others....which affects the dura....which is why one is approaching the cranium in the first place. And, of course, none of it can be done without blocking the pelvis. That's how I learned it anyway. Without respecting the respiratory component, you and your patient may not have a happy time of it. Sunny Sunny Kierstyn, RN DC Fibromyalgia Care Center of Oregon 2677 Willakenzie Road, 7CEugene, Oregon, 97401541- 654-0850; Fx; 541- 654-0834www.drsunnykierstyn.com To: oregondcs From: docwiese7@...Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 09:17:22 -0700Subject: NCR verse Nasal Specific

Can anyone explain to me the difference between Nasal Specific Technique verse NeuroCranial Restructuring by Dr. Dean Howell? Is there some great difference to the same end regarding inserting this balloon into the nasal cavity, other then the expense to take his course?

Does anyone have an opinion regarding this very hard technique to move the Sphenoid Bone (and everything else at the same time) verses using Upledger or AK cranial manipulation that takes into account respiration and more subtle adjusting?

Don't get me wrong, I am not putting it down as I do not know enough about either technique, as they both seem brutal to me, but that does not mean I am right or that it really is not the way to do Cranial adjusting to this master bone. Any knowledgeable cranial adjusters out there that would like to comment?

http://www.drdeanhowell.com/

Walt DC

Eagle Point