Guest guest Posted February 2, 2011 Report Share Posted February 2, 2011 H pylori antibody titres in serum, plasma and successively thawed specimens we excluded two subjects with high titres, 1900 and 3600, well above the cut off value of 500 in the repeated measures analysis of this effect. The average change in titre (using untransformed data) detected among the remaining subjects was -0.31 per thaw (se = 5.7, p = 0.96). The maximum probable change per thaw was estimated (from the 95% CI) at -1 1.5. Hence, after three thawings it would be possible for the titre to drop by as much as 34.5. This would cause the sensitivity of the test to decrease only slightly (estimated reduction 1.3% based on the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve produced by the manufacturer). This small decrease from 92.5% to 91.2% in the proportion of H pylori positive subjects detected by the assay is not of any epidemiological significance. For eradication trials we were interested in the effect of thawings on serum titres among all subjects who were H pylori positive and who would normally be eligible for treatment. For these subjects the mean titre was 1245 and the average drop in titre detected by repeated measures analysis was -75.8 per thaw (se = 33.7 p = 0.04). The maximum probable drop per thaw was 11.4%, which may be of clinical significance. Discussion Our results suggest that either plasma or serum, and specimens that have been stored frozen and subsequently thawed on several occasions, can be used for epidemiological research where a small additional misclassification rate can be tolerated. Specimens which have thawed accidentally during storage or transportation and been refrozen may also be usefully tested for Hpylori status. Among all H pylori positive subjects, the change in titre per thaw was statistically significant and the estimated drop could be as extreme as 11.4% per thaw. This needs to be taken into account when using a drop in titre as an indicator of eradication of Hpylori infection during follow up of treatment. Successful eradication of Hpylori infection is usually associated with a drop in titre of at least 60% of the pretreatment value, which generally occurs within 12 months.3 It is possible that multiple thawing of specimens could make a significant contribution to such a drop in titre. Thawing baseline and follow up specimens once only and testing all specimens concurrently would be prudent. We thank Mr C Pearce and staff of the Department of Microbiology, Dorevitch Pathology, Ballarat Base Hospital, for their technical assistance and use of facilities. This study was funded by the Shepherd Foundation. The Department of Public Health and Community Medicine is a member of the n Public Health Consortium. 1 Granberg C, Mansikka A, Lehtonen O-P, Kujari H, Gronfors R, Nurmi H, et al. Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection by using Pyloriset EIA-G and EIA-A for detection of serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgA antibodies. J Clin Microbiol 1993;31:1450-3. 2 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;i:307-10. 3 Kosunen TU, Seppala K, Sarna S, Sipponen P. Diagnostic value of decreasing IgG, IgA, and IgM antibody titres after eradication of H. pylori. Lancet 1992;339:893-5. _F Clin Pathol 1996;49:1019-1020 The order of draw of blood specimens into additive containing tubes does not affect potassium and calcium measurements Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Western Infirmary, Glasgow Gll 6NT A Majid D C Heaney N Padmanabhan Department of Biochemistry R Spooner Correspondence to: Dr A Majid, Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8111, 660 S Euclid Avenue, St Louis, MO 63110-1093 USA. Accepted for publication 4 September 1996 A Majid, D C Heaney, N Padmanabhan, R Spooner Abstract The effect of order of draw when taking blood into tubes containing additive was investigated in 47 medical inpatients; 12 of these patients acted as a control group. The samples were analysed in the order in which they were withdrawn. The results of potassium and calcium concentrations did not differ significantly between groups. Manufacturers recommend a specific order of draw when taking blood using vacuum based blood collection systems, which are routinely used in many hospitals. The results of this study, however, show that order of draw has no effect on calcium or potassium concentrations. (7 Clin Pathol 1996;49:1019-1020) Keywords: order of draw, venepuncture, Vacutainer system, potassium concentration, calcium concentration. The importance of correct collection and handling of blood specimens has been highlighted before.1 2 Calam and have suggested that the order of draw of blood specimens into tubes containing additive may affect measured serum potassium and calcium concentrations.3 In their small (n = 5) report they suggest that if 1019 Majid, Heaney, Padmanabhan, Spooner blood is drawn initially into potassium-EDTA bottles before bottles containing no anticoagulant, then abnormally low calcium and abnormally high potassium values will be obtained. It was suggested that potassium-EDTA from the first tube contaminated the second tube. However, venepuncture was noted to be difficult in all their subjects. As a result of the above report, Becton Dickinson (Cowley, Oxford, UK) who manufacture the Vacutainer system, recommend an order of draw for collecting blood specimens into additive containing bottles as follows: (a) tubes containing no anticoagulant; ( citrate; © heparin; (d) potassium-EDTA; and (e) tubes containing fluoride-oxalate. This recommendation is rarely adhered to in clinical practice. Critical therapeutic decisions are therefore made on the assumption of accurate biochemical results. In our larger study, the effect of order of draw on measured potassium and calcium concentrations was formally investigated. Methods Using a 21 gauge needle, antecubital blood samples were withdrawn from a single vein within two minutes of a tourniquet being applied, from 47 medical inpatients whose informed permission had been obtained. Twelve patients acted as a control group, having blood withdrawn sequentially into three vacuum tubes containing no anticoagulant (Vacutainer, Becton Dickinson). The other 35 patients acted as the trial group. Blood was drawn sequentially into a tube containing no anticoagulant, a potassium-EDTA tube, and then a second tube containing no anticoagulant. The samples were analysed in the order they were withdrawn, using conventional biochemical analysis on an Olympus AU5200 (Eastleigh, UK) series analyser. Paired t tests were used to assess significance of any differences between non-anticoagulated sample pairs within the two groups. Unpaired t tests were used to compare the differences observed in the control group with those in the trial group. Results The results are shown in table 1 and exclude one patient in whom a difficult venepuncture was associated with ballooning at the site of venepuncture. In this subject, both analytes lay more than 5 SD from the mean of the trial group. While a slight rise in potassium concentration and a slight lowering of calcium concentration was seen in the trial group, this Table I Mean concentration differences between first and final blood samples for control and trial subjects. Results are expressed as mean difference (SD) n Potassium Calcium (mmolNl) (mmolNl) Control 12 0.025 (0.205) 0.014 (0.041) Trial 34 0.015 (0.131) -0.011 (0.044) Table 2 T tests between paired and unpaired analyte concentrations Potassium Calcium Control pre v post p = 0.68 p = 0.26 Trial pre vpost p = 0.52 p = 0.15 Control v trial p = 0.87 p = 0.09 was not significantly different from that found in the control group (table 2). The results obtained are in line with laboratory internal quality control data. Within batch imprecision (SD) for potassium was 0.16 mmol/l and 0.042 mmol/l for calcium. Conclusion The results of this study show that success or otherwise of venepuncture is more important in determining serum calcium and potassium results than the order of draw. Our results show that the order of draw of blood specimens into additive containing tubes does not affect potassium and calcium measurements. We suggest that the high potassium and the low calcium measurements of other studies were due to local factors rather than the order of draw. Local tissue damage during a difficult venepuncture induces release of potassium from damaged cells and this high extracellular potassium leads to depolarisation of local cells causing calcium to flood into them, resulting in high potassium and low calcium measurements. We conclude that the order of draw does not effect the potassium and calcium measurements but difficult venepuncture may result in high potassium and low calcium concentrations as a result of local factors. We are grateful for the advice of Professor J L Reid and Dr J Frater, Department of Biochemistry, and Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Western Infirmary, Glasgow. 1 Young DS, Pestaner LC, Gibberman V. Effects of drugs on clinical laboratory tests. Clin Chem 1975;21:1-432D. 2 Winston S. Collection and preservation of specimens. Stand Methods Clin Chem 1965;5:1-17. 3 Calam RR, MH. Recommended 'Order of Draw' for collecting blood specimens into additive containing tubes. Clin Chem 1982;28:1399. 1020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.