Guest guest Posted November 13, 2002 Report Share Posted November 13, 2002 What Casler fairly casually write in his recent letter leads us to an interesting new Puzzle & Paradox, namely that " a kinetic chain may be stronger than its weakest link in a biological system. " Casler: <Regarding RFD, the transmission of force through the kinetic chain can only be as efficient as the weakest link in that chain. So it would certainly stand to reason that conditioning the " full " chain (chains) involved would offer the best result.> *** The saying that a " chain is only as strong as its weakest link " certainly appears to be true in all rigid systems, but does it have to be qualified or re-stated if it contains a sequence of links some of which are rigid, non-rigid and fluidic? In such a case, the rigid elements are stronger than the non-rigid elements and much 'stronger' than the fluidic elements, so we are now compelled to examine how strength is defined in a " linked " system. Is this puzzle simply an intellectual diversion or does it have any relevance to the body? Well, the body contains just this sort of system of different links, with some links weaker than others. Does this necessarily mean that the overall strength of the body will be limited by its weakest fluidic or highly deformable components, which, after all are not as strong as the bones and ligaments? Does the ability of these " weaker " elements cope with this relative " weakness " depend on their doing exactly what they are meant to do, namely to absorb shock, store elastic energy and transfer elastic energy? In fact, their very " weakness " protects the more rigid parts of the body from damage and enhances the efficiency of movement, thereby making it " stronger " in coping with and in generating force. Would this then not imply that even apparently " weak " links in a biological chain can " strengthen " the overall performance of a linked kinetic chain, so that we cannot directly apply that popular colloquial saying ( " a chain is only as strong as its weakest link " ) without careful statement of its scope and limitations in living systems? Dr Mel C Siff Denver, USA http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Supertraining/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.