Guest guest Posted October 15, 2002 Report Share Posted October 15, 2002 Carruthersjam@... writes: << Any comments? < Carruthers Yes. - The people who make, and the people who give out SSRIs like Seroxat / Paxil etc, should be shot. Better still, forced fed heroin until addicted, then made to go cold turkey. Then repeat. Simon Pitt, B'Ham, England Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 16, 2002 Report Share Posted October 16, 2002 enigma2771@... writes: << Yes. - The people who make, and the people who give out SSRIs like Seroxat / Paxil etc, should be shot. Better still, forced fed heroin until addicted, then made to go cold turkey. Then repeat. >> Maybe some of them all the time--and all some of the time--but not all of them all the time. Until you realize the difference between life and a carrot, as a function of an SSRI, you may be better served by empathy, concious awareness and reflection as opposed to unsullied condemmnation. Jerry Telle Lakewood CO USA *Don't forget to sign all letters with full name and city of residence if you wish them to be published! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 16, 2002 Report Share Posted October 16, 2002 Simon Pitt<enigma2771@a... > wrote: > Yes. - The people who make, and the people who give out SSRIs > like Seroxat / Paxil etc, should be shot. Better still, forced fed heroin until addicted, then made to go cold turkey. Then repeat. ** I was of the same opinion during the programme. However, after a little time of reflection I think these drugs can play a role in combating depression and other mental illnesses. Yet, before they are prescribed to anyone, a complete evaluation of the history of the patient / depression should be undertaken. It is worth noting that most individuals with mental health problems seek help from their GPs, yet GPs have no specialised training in this area (s et al, 1999). No wonder GPs advocate these drugs because they don't know what to do? More education needed in this area? Other treatments should be researched to a greater degree and applied more frequently rather than the continual 'candy pushing approach': 1. Exercise 2. Stress management techniques – relaxation 3. Lifestyle modifications – diet etc. 4. Using all of the senses to combat mental illnesses (see previous messages). Look at how the architectural profession is developing – our surroundings have a huge impact on our health. 5. Herbal remedies 6. Placebo 7. Any more? Carruthers Wakefield UK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 17, 2002 Report Share Posted October 17, 2002 <Simon Pitt wrote: > Yes. - The people who make, and the people who give out SSRIs > like Seroxat / Paxil etc, should be shot. Better still, forced fed >heroin until addicted, then made to go cold turkey. Then repeat. Carruthers replied: <<I was of the same opinion during the programme. However, after a little time of reflection I think these drugs can play a role in combating depression and other mental illnesses. >> I really don't. I speak from experience as I was put on two different types of SSRI, one recently, the other several years ago. The first experience was bad, and I stopped taking them after a few days. The more recent time though (about two years ago) was one of the worst mistakes I have ever made. It was how I'd imagine hell would be like. I was on them for a couple of months until I could take no more (my doctor said persevere, as the side effects pass, but they didn't). Coming off was *much* worse. In fact, it was so bad I don't really want to remember how bad it was. Now does this sound like the words of someone put on a drug to improve mood?! Now I struggle not to despise doctors and don't trust them at all. I feel much better since self-prescribing St s Wort, 5-HTP and fish oil, amongst other natural products, despite some research suggesting that they may not be of value. Seriously, I don't think there is any place for SSRIs when there are so many comparable, safer alternatives out there which can be found to suit the given individual. I also know that gamma hydroxy-butyrate (GHB) will temporally cure a depressed person in about 15 minutes, but of course it's made out now (by the people " in charge " , whom the pharmaceutical industries pay off) to be some hideous evil drug. Is it even possible today to find totally independent objective studies of many drugs like this without drug or medical establishment influence on the results? How can we trust the medical establishment today when there appear to be so many vested and subjective interests underlying the whole system? Simon Pitt, B'Ham, England Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 18, 2002 Report Share Posted October 18, 2002 JRTELLE@... writes: << Maybe some of them all the time--and all some of the time--but not all of <them all the time. Until you realize the difference between life and a <carrot, as a function of an SSRI, you may be better served by empathy, <concious awareness and reflection as opposed to unsullied condemmnation. <Jerry Telle >> No, i'd say that was rubbish. Simon Pitt, B'Ham, England Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 18, 2002 Report Share Posted October 18, 2002 >>> I really don't. I speak from experience as I was put on two different types of SSRI, one recently, the other several years ago. The first experience was bad, and I stopped taking them after a few days. The more recent time though (about two years ago) was one of the worst mistakes I have ever made. It was how I'd imagine hell would be like. I was on them for a couple of months until I could take no more (my doctor said persevere, as the side effects pass, but they didn't). Coming off was *much* worse. In fact, it was so bad I don't really want to remember how bad it was.>>> ***Surely doesn't your experiences emphasise the need to further education / research in this area. It seems similar to that of many other cases where the GP lacks knowledge and understanding with regard to these drugs, alternative solutions and depression (mental illnesses). I believe prior to prescribing these drugs the GP should carefully evaluate the patient to determine whether or not they have a genuine pathological problem. If the GP doesn't think the patient has the latter he or she may offer alternatives to these drugs as suggested in previous messages (exercise, lifestyle / diet modifications etc). However, if the patient still wishes to take these drugs he or she should be informed of the potential side effects. Additionally, further research should be completed in the following areas: 1. Timing effects of these drugs 2. Side effects - why some people suffer while some don't. If I recall correctly in one study one in four of the healthy volunteers suffered some kind of side effect. 3. Cycling these drugs. Most individuals taking these drugs stop them quite abruptly – individuals should be encouraged to lower the doses week by week, day by day (as some bodybuilders do using anabolic steroids) 4. Combinations with complementary medicines to determine drug-herb or drug-supplement interactions. >>>Now does this sound like the words of someone put on a drug to improve mood?! Now I struggle not to despise doctors and don't trust them at all. I feel much better since self-prescribing St s Wort, 5-HTP and fish oil, amongst other natural products, despite some research suggesting that they may not be of value.>>>> ***I know how you feel believe you me. I was also prescribed a number of anti-depressants to combat IBS (Irritable Bowel Syndrome) about 2 years ago - as well as drugs for pain, nausea, bloating and diarrhea - antispasmodics, fibre supplements, antiflatulents, antibiotics – none of latter worked for ME. I could easily be dismissive of the medical profession after my experience, but I realise that they can only use the tools which they have been given. I also appreciate the fact that from reading a number of books and attending a few conferences that some of these drugs have been shown to work quite successfully for others. >>>Seriously, I don't think there is any place for SSRIs when there are so many comparable, safer alternatives out there which can be found to suit the given individual. I also know that gamma hydroxy- butyrate (GHB) will temporally cure a depressed person in about 15 minutes, but of course it's made out now (by the people " in charge " , whom the pharmaceutical industries pay off) to be some hideous evil drug.>>> ***Has there been any research completed comparing these drugs to other alternatives? How do we know that they are safer? How effective are they? Recently, at the International Conference for Complementary and Alternative Medicines there was quite a concern regarding the exponential utilisation of these methods suggesting that `it is imperative that research assessing the safety and efficacy of these modalities expands.' Some concerns regarding this market: 1. Poorly regulated – contaminations, purity, dosages 2. A great deal of pseudoscientific evidence 3. If it's not a prescription drug it must be completely safe attitude >>> Is it even possible today to find totally independent objective studies of many drugs like this without drug or medical establishment influence on the results? How can we trust the medical establishment today when there appear to be so many vested and subjective interests underlying the whole system?>>> ***Isn't it similar with regard to nutrition, sport and fitness, alternative medicines...? I appreciate your comments Carruthers Wakefield UK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2002 Report Share Posted October 19, 2002 This is anecdotal but confirms other information exchanged on the Supertraining list: My wife suffers from depression and also had a very strong adverse reaction to Prozac. The doctors at the local practice were largely ignorant and consequently not only unhelpful but also unsympathetic. This is simply a lack of professionalism (as well as time and resources). She also found St 's Wort more helpful, but deliberately kept her use of it to a minimum. A journalist friend of mine was responsive to Prozac, first prescribed to her during an emotional crisis (abandoned by long-term partner) ten years ago and is now dependent on it with her doctor's complicity and returns to using it once every year or so. FWIW Mike Benis BA FIL MITI Freelance Communications Consultant, Copywriter, Journalist and Translator EC freelance translator Brighton UK michaelbenis@... www.michaelbenis.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2002 Report Share Posted October 19, 2002 << << Maybe some of them all the time--and all some of the time--but not all of <them all the time. Until you realize the difference between life and a <carrot, as a function of an SSRI, you may be better served by empathy, <concious awareness and reflection as opposed to unsullied condemmnation. <Jerry Telle >> No, i'd say that was rubbish. Simon Pitt,>> Well Simon--rubbish is rubbish until something other than rubbish comes along--with your gift for the terse and distinct I'll expect your enlightened response to clear the horiizon of debris. Jerry Telle Lakewood CO USA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.