Guest guest Posted February 1, 2003 Report Share Posted February 1, 2003 Was: Tightening or Relaxing the Glutes in Yoga? Verdella wrote: <There is a controversy in the yoga world about whether the glutes should be relaxed or tightened while doing the " Cobra " or " Up dog " pose. It's like a hyperextension on the floor. In the Cobra, your lower body (hips to toes) stay on the floor as you push up with your hands. In the " up dog " , your back is arched also, but the hips and legs are off the floor, Does tightening or relaxing the glutes have an effect on the lower back during this position?> *** This issue has to be prefaced by the question: " Are we interested more in passive or active muscle involvement in these asanas? " Remember that the glutes may be used to extend the hips or the trunk, depending on the given movement. They may also be used to offer isometric stabilisation, so we have to address all of these issues before one can offer any definitive solution to that yoga " problem. " I believe that many asanas can be very profitably modified by using alternate phases of isometric, dynamic or even explosive action, as well as by breath holding to limit initial range of movement (instead of using gentle inhalation and exhalation all the time). For example, intense isometric holding of one's current limit in range of any joint motion followed by a small dynamic movement beyond that position (synchronised with breath holding and breathing) can significantly increase one's range of strength-flexibility. This method is very similar to some of the " hold-relax " or " contract-relax " methods of physiotherapeutic PNF (Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation) One may also use isometric action, gentle dynamic movement or pulsed dynamic actions to self mobilise or self manipulate the spine and other joints. In other words, one may tighten or relax or alternately tighten and relax any muscles that you wish in yoga to achieve a desired goal or enjoy a certain process. By the way, for anyone who thinks that Bikram Yoga done in a hot, sweaty room is something trendy or special should come to our facility to enjoy many yogic and other therapeutic or conditioning movements done under open air (sometimes in the snow) and contrast bathing conditions (in alternate very hot and cold water) under the clear blue skies of lovely Colorado. Bikram and his disciples don't know what they are missing. Dr Mel C Siff Denver, USA http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Supertraining/ Dr Mel C Siff Denver, USA http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Supertraining/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 1, 2003 Report Share Posted February 1, 2003 Thanks, Mel! I do use the Relax-contraction methods also. But an Iyengar teacher recently told me that tensing the glutes puts too much pressure on the sacrum. I've searched high and low, yet I've found no science to back that up. Every resource I've found disputes that. And the goal would be a passive stretch. [You are correct - you won't find any science to back up that teacher's beliefs. Ask him/her to provide some references. Mel Siff] Oh, seriously....is yoga in the cold healthy? [As is the case with all physical activity, effectiveness and safety depend on exactly how yoga is done, so the problems with doing yoga in the cold would be proportional to the time spent in the cold, with frost bite not being the least of those problems (though, of course, some yogi adepts have been known to use their form of " mind control " to cope for prolonged periods in the freezing cold). The moderate and intelligent use of yoga in the cold or the heat should pose no problems for the average healthy person. Mel Siff] The heat in Bikram was nothing to me. I was/am a wrestler. Pounding someones body and being pounded in a heated room is a lot easier than doing asanas in the heat. Verdell Lansing, MI *Don't forget to sign all letters with full name and city of residence if you wish them to be published! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2003 Report Share Posted February 2, 2003 Given my understanding of Iyengar-based yoga, that teacher is exactly wrong. Even your description of the Cobra movement sounds far off. The movement starts with the gradual tightening of the glutes and lower back, and the spine is extended primarily via muscular effort in these muscles. One does not 'push' with the hands, but merely uses them as semi-passive support. Note that the amplitude of the movement is not spectacular. My teacher (30 yrs experience, including years with BKS Iyengar) never made unsubstantiated speculative anatomical claims like the one you relate about the sacrum. My understanding of the purpose of Cobra is to learn strong, active spinal flexion in which the angle between no two vertebrae is substantially more acute than others (i.e., " hinge-ing " ), making for a smoothly curved spine. This is strong way to flex the spine in which the muscles and learned movement pattern provides protection for the connective elements of the vertebral joints. Get a partner to give feedback, and you'll likely find that relaxing the glutes and 'pushing' the floor with the hands will result in a severe 'hinge' point somewhere in the spine - a place where you are passively bending one spinal joint far more than the others and putting the stress on its passive connective elements. I am aware of no specific research that proves this is bad for you, but anyone who thinks cranking away on a hinged spine like that to form a pretty Cobra pose is a good idea is welcome to it. Personally, I would not take yoga from a teacher who did not understand this elementary principle. Wilbanks ville, FL -------- Verdell wrote: > Thanks, Mel! > > I do use the Relax-contraction methods also. But an Iyengar teacher > recently told me that tensing the glutes puts too much pressure on > the sacrum. I've searched high and low, yet I've found no science to > back that up. Every resource I've found disputes that. And the goal > would be a passive stretch. > > [You are correct - you won't find any science to back up that > teacher's beliefs. Ask him/her to provide some references. Mel Siff] > Oh, seriously....is yoga in the cold healthy? > [As is the case with all physical activity, effectiveness and safety > depend on exactly how yoga is done, so the problems with doing > yoga in the cold would be proportional to the time spent in the cold, > with frost bite not being the least of those problems (though, of course, > some yogi adepts have been known to use their form of " mind control " to > cope for prolonged periods in the freezing cold). The moderate > and intelligent use of yoga in the cold or the heat should pose no > problems for the average healthy person. Mel Siff] > > The heat in Bikram was nothing to me. I was/am a wrestler. Pounding > someones body and being pounded in a heated room is a lot easier than > doing asanas in the heat. *Don't forget to sign all letters with full name and city of residence if you wish them to be published! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2003 Report Share Posted February 2, 2003 I agree that Iyengar instructor is not understanding or teaching yoga competently. She's not my teacher. Verdell Lansing, MI Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2003 Report Share Posted February 2, 2003 It was written: > I do use the Relax-contraction methods also. But an Iyengar teacher > recently told me that tensing the glutes puts too much pressure on > the sacrum. I've searched high and low, yet I've found no science to > back that up. Every resource I've found disputes that. And the goal > would be a passive stretch. The only asanas where I was told to relax the glutes were the upward dog and bridges, where glutes tighten up automatically hard. The theory is that whenever one does a back bending asana, the spine should be elongated both upwards and downwards (well this maxim should be applied in almost all asanas), and overly tight glutes prevent the spine from stretching downwards. It leaves no gaps between the vertebrates for the spine to bend backwards safely. Now I don't know if this is true or not, because supposedly the incorrect way shows its effect years later. However, my yoga teacher has a lower back problem due to performing the upward dog pose incorrectly for many years, so I do take this advice more seriously, just in case. Also this advice has been found across many systems of hatha yoga, so this may be something to counter the inherent risk in back bending poses. [On the other hand, there are thousands of us who executed the standing Olympic Press with heavy loads for many years and have never suffered from any back injuries from that powerful back bending movement - and I think that the spinal loading in that weightlifting movement is a great deal more than that produced by some isometric action of the glutes in yoga. Maybe all those apparently frail yogi need to augment their training with some serious lifting! Mel Siff] Bob Yu Montreal, Canada Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.