Guest guest Posted August 30, 2010 Report Share Posted August 30, 2010 Some would call it a relief panel.CE Grim MDOn Aug 29, 2010, at 9:29 PM, Francis Bill SUSPECTED PA wrote:If one visits a nursing home it opens your eyes to many things. Many there want to be dead and if they had there way they would be. Do we have the right to keep them alive against there will? If there was a death panel this would be where you would see it at work.> > > > Berwick's work is an excellent source for those who will argue that socialized medicine, redistribution of income, loss of freedom, and death panels are absolutely not what America wants. For him to be in charge of the official death panel for those over 65 is truly a betrayal of the American people.> > > > > > Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic> > Messages in this topic (33)> > RECENT ACTIVITY: New Members 6> > Visit Your Group> > MARKETPLACE> > Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.> > > > > > Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.> > > > > > Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 30, 2010 Report Share Posted August 30, 2010 " Relief " is a family and individual decision. It is not a decision for the collectivist. Val From: hyperaldosteronism [mailto:hyperaldosteronism ] On Behalf Of Clarence Grim Some would call it a relief panel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 30, 2010 Report Share Posted August 30, 2010 It cannot be done without the individual's input. or their designaetd one."Relief" is a family and individual decision. It is not a decision for the collectivist. Val From: hyperaldosteronism [mailto:hyperaldosteronism ] On Behalf Of Clarence Grim Some would call it a relief panel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 30, 2010 Report Share Posted August 30, 2010 They are doing it to my friend's mother right now. She made the mistake of choosing Kaiser (an HMO) for Medicare. That means she's stuck. She had stomach surgery which Kaiser admits they botched. They have her in a rehab center and the (probably overworked) nurses are mistreating her. My friend had to call 911 a few nights ago to get attention for her mother. Kaiser wants her to go to hospice. Of course, that would be cheaper. The Kaiser " relief panel " is alive and well. I have another friend who is a medical malpractice attorney. She long ago lost count of how many times she has sued Kaiser. Val From: hyperaldosteronism [mailto:hyperaldosteronism ] On Behalf Of Clarence Grim It cannot be done without the individual's input. or their designaetd one. On Aug 30, 2010, at 1:32 PM, Valarie wrote: " Relief " is a family and individual decision. It is not a decision for the collectivist. From: hyperaldosteronism [mailto:hyperaldosteronism ] On Behalf Of Clarence Grim Some would call it a relief panel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 30, 2010 Report Share Posted August 30, 2010 I drive a 23-year-old car and use the savings to buy my own long-term care insurance. My husband drives a 19-year-old car and uses the savings to pay for his own long-term care insuirance. We didn't have vacations. Maybe that's how we put togither enough to secure our future. We don't intend to have any more outside intrusion than absolutely necessary. We have a 10 kw solar system and geothermal heating/cooling. Our utilities, including water, gas, lights, garbagre, run under $200/month. The more we shop, the more we learn pretty much where to get what we want for drugs, supplies, etc. I've been using spironolactone from New Zealand and T4 from Mexico for years. My doctor doesn't accept any insurance, Medicare or otherwise. Right now, I can turn his bills in once I hit the deductible. Once I have to go on Medicare, no part of his bills can be submitted to my " insurance " - Medicare - ever! Never! Because he is not a government sanctioned physician. Mind you, those on Medicare cannot buy anything else. Medicare is their ONLY CHOICE. The more you know, the better you'll live. Val [mailto:hyperaldosteronism ] On Behalf Of Francis Bill SUSPECTED PA Like it or not the Gov is going to be a part of our health care. Most can not pay $60,000 or more for long term nursing home care for long. If we didn't have Medicade most would just die alone in there home. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 2010 Report Share Posted August 31, 2010 Good for the suits. How many did she win? I don't know Kaiser's record for getting rid of bad Drs but must be public.Mistakes happen. Medicine is not a perfect science. Well not science is perfect except maybe math.Hospice is also more humane in many cases. One of our goals is to minimize suffering. CE Grim MDThey are doing it to my friend's mother right now. She made the mistake of choosing Kaiser (an HMO) for Medicare. That means she's stuck. She had stomach surgery which Kaiser admits they botched. They have her in a rehab center and the (probably overworked) nurses are mistreating her. My friend had to call 911 a few nights ago to get attention for her mother. Kaiser wants her to go to hospice. Of course, that would be cheaper. The Kaiser "relief panel" is alive and well. I have another friend who is a medical malpractice attorney. She long ago lost count of how many times she has sued Kaiser. Val From: hyperaldosteronism [mailto:hyperaldosteronism ] On Behalf Of Clarence GrimIt cannot be done without the individual's input. or their designaetd one. "Relief" is a family and individual decision. It is not a decision for the collectivist. From: hyperaldosteronism [mailto:hyperaldosteronism ] On Behalf Of Clarence Grim Some would call it a relief panel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 2010 Report Share Posted August 31, 2010 No it is because he refuses to take Medicare patients. The choice is his. Tiped sad Send form miiPhone ;-)May your pressure be low!CE Grim MDSpecializing in DifficultHypertension I drive a 23-year-old car and use the savings to buy my own long-term care insurance. My husband drives a 19-year-old car and uses the savings to pay for his own long-term care insuirance. We didn't have vacations. Maybe that's how we put togither enough to secure our future. We don't intend to have any more outside intrusion than absolutely necessary. We have a 10 kw solar system and geothermal heating/cooling. Our utilities, including water, gas, lights, garbagre, run under $200/month. The more we shop, the more we learn pretty much where to get what we want for drugs, supplies, etc. I've been using spironolactone from New Zealand and T4 from Mexico for years. My doctor doesn't accept any insurance, Medicare or otherwise. Right now, I can turn his bills in once I hit the deductible. Once I have to go on Medicare, no part of his bills can be submitted to my "insurance" - Medicare - ever! Never! Because he is not a government sanctioned physician. Mind you, those on Medicare cannot buy anything else. Medicare is their ONLY CHOICE. The more you know, the better you'll live. Val [mailto:hyperaldosteronism ] On Behalf Of Francis Bill SUSPECTED PA Like it or not the Gov is going to be a part of our health care. Most can not pay $60,000 or more for long term nursing home care for long. If we didn't have Medicade most would just die alone in there home. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 2010 Report Share Posted August 31, 2010 No you will still be able to pay him. At least I would ask if he will not still take your money. God bless America. Tiped sad Send form miiPhone ;-)May your pressure be low!CE Grim MDSpecializing in DifficultHypertension I drive a 23-year-old car and use the savings to buy my own long-term care insurance. My husband drives a 19-year-old car and uses the savings to pay for his own long-term care insuirance. We didn't have vacations. Maybe that's how we put togither enough to secure our future. We don't intend to have any more outside intrusion than absolutely necessary. We have a 10 kw solar system and geothermal heating/cooling. Our utilities, including water, gas, lights, garbagre, run under $200/month. The more we shop, the more we learn pretty much where to get what we want for drugs, supplies, etc. I've been using spironolactone from New Zealand and T4 from Mexico for years. My doctor doesn't accept any insurance, Medicare or otherwise. Right now, I can turn his bills in once I hit the deductible. Once I have to go on Medicare, no part of his bills can be submitted to my "insurance" - Medicare - ever! Never! Because he is not a government sanctioned physician. Mind you, those on Medicare cannot buy anything else. Medicare is their ONLY CHOICE. The more you know, the better you'll live. Val [mailto:hyperaldosteronism ] On Behalf Of Francis Bill SUSPECTED PA Like it or not the Gov is going to be a part of our health care. Most can not pay $60,000 or more for long term nursing home care for long. If we didn't have Medicade most would just die alone in there home. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 2010 Report Share Posted August 31, 2010 My friend's mother would not live long if they pull out her feeding tube as they want to do. She'd starve to death. Without question, I'm sure Kaiser thinks that would be less expensive than giving her proper medical care. They are demanding a doctor who has respect for life. Whether they get it with Kaiser is another question. If she can hang on four more months, she can escape Kaiser. Val From: hyperaldosteronism [mailto:hyperaldosteronism ] On Behalf Of Francis Bill SUSPECTED PA To be put on hospice you have to have Dr say very unlikely you will live more then 6 more months. Not all Hospice work the same. From what I know about hospice one should ask a lot of questions and make good plans as to what is to be done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 2010 Report Share Posted August 31, 2010 What is the prognosis? Is she comfortable. What does she want to do? These are questions that must be considered.Many times proper medical care is to know when to stop "care". We can prolong "life" in many circumstances but at a cost of increasing suffering. Clearly a cost benefit analysis that all of will need to make some day. CE Grim MDMy friend's mother would not live long if they pull out her feeding tube as they want to do. She'd starve to death. Without question, I'm sure Kaiser thinks that would be less expensive than giving her proper medical care. They are demanding a doctor who has respect for life. Whether they get it with Kaiser is another question. If she can hang on four more months, she can escape Kaiser. ValFrom: hyperaldosteronism [mailto:hyperaldosteronism ] On Behalf Of Francis Bill SUSPECTED PA To be put on hospice you have to have Dr say very unlikely you will live more then 6 more months. Not all Hospice work the same. From what I know about hospice one should ask a lot of questions and make good plans as to what is to be done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 2010 Report Share Posted August 31, 2010 I can turn my bills into Blue Cross even though my doc doesn't directly accept any insurance. Once I meet the deductible, I can either use the insurance at time of service, or send the claims in later. When I have to be in Medicare because I have NO CHOICE, I cannot turn any of his bills over to (even if they are catastrophic) my " insurance " because my doc is not a government-sanctioned physician. If I had choice, that would be different, but I will have NO CHOICE in where I buy insurance. This is government very directly inserting itself between my doctor and me. Only if I play fair (go to a government doctor) do I get to use my insurance. Val From: hyperaldosteronism [mailto:hyperaldosteronism ] On Behalf Of Clarence Grim No it is because he refuses to take Medicare patients. The choice is his. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 2010 Report Share Posted August 31, 2010 You can still pay your Dr directly I suspect.CE Grim MDI can turn my bills into Blue Cross even though my doc doesn't directly accept any insurance. Once I meet the deductible, I can either use the insurance at time of service, or send the claims in later. When I have to be in Medicare because I have NO CHOICE, I cannot turn any of his bills over to (even if they are catastrophic) my "insurance" because my doc is not a government-sanctioned physician. If I had choice, that would be different, but I will have NO CHOICE in where I buy insurance. This is government very directly inserting itself between my doctor and me. Only if I play fair (go to a government doctor) do I get to use my insurance. Val From: hyperaldosteronism [mailto:hyperaldosteronism ] On Behalf Of Clarence Grim No it is because he refuses to take Medicare patients. The choice is his. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 2010 Report Share Posted August 31, 2010 The point is that I will not be able to use my insurance because I have no intention of playing nice with a government doctor. The point is I will have NO CHOICE in insurance. In time, if the socialists get their way, no one will have any choice in doctors either unless they take advantage of medical travel businesses like that of my U.S. Representative, Polis. Already, I have friends who get all their routine care done in Panama. Val From: hyperaldosteronism [mailto:hyperaldosteronism ] On Behalf Of Clarence Grim No you will still be able to pay him. At least I would ask if he will not still take your money. God bless America. On Aug 31, 2010, at 1:38 AM, Valarie wrote: My doctor doesn't accept any insurance, Medicare or otherwise. Right now, I can turn his bills in once I hit the deductible. Once I have to go on Medicare, no part of his bills can be submitted to my " insurance " - Medicare - ever! Never!  Because he is not a government sanctioned physician. Mind you, those on Medicare cannot buy anything else. Medicare is their ONLY CHOICE. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 2010 Report Share Posted August 31, 2010 It is Kaiser because she has a Medicare Advantage plan with them. Until she can escape, Kaiser owns her. Val From: hyperaldosteronism [mailto:hyperaldosteronism ] On Behalf Of Francis Bill SUSPECTED PA In this it is not medicare that isn't paying the bill. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 2010 Report Share Posted August 31, 2010 I thought that was called slavery?I am sure Kaiser would let her go anywhere she wants to pay.CE Grim MDIt is Kaiser because she has a Medicare Advantage plan with them. Until she can escape, Kaiser owns her. Val From: hyperaldosteronism [mailto:hyperaldosteronism ] On Behalf Of Francis Bill SUSPECTED PA In this it is not medicare that isn't paying the bill. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 2010 Report Share Posted August 31, 2010 She is in pain from her recent surgery and she desperately wants to live. My friend had to call 911 the other night to get her pain meds. She called me to see if she was over-reacting. Kaiser wants to pull her feeding tube. Val From: hyperaldosteronism [mailto:hyperaldosteronism ] On Behalf Of Clarence Grim What is the prognosis? Is she comfortable. What does she want to do? These are questions that must be considered. Many times proper medical care is to know when to stop " care " . We can prolong " life " in many circumstances but at a cost of increasing suffering. Clearly a cost benefit analysis that all of will need to make some day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 2010 Report Share Posted August 31, 2010 She should not have to endure pain these days.CE Grim MDShe is in pain from her recent surgery and she desperately wants to live. My friend had to call 911 the other night to get her pain meds. She called me to see if she was over-reacting. Kaiser wants to pull her feeding tube. Val From: hyperaldosteronism [mailto:hyperaldosteronism ] On Behalf Of Clarence GrimWhat is the prognosis? Is she comfortable. What does she want to do? These are questions that must be considered. Many times proper medical care is to know when to stop "care". We can prolong "life" in many circumstances but at a cost of increasing suffering. Clearly a cost benefit analysis that all of will need to make some day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 2010 Report Share Posted August 31, 2010 Respect for life, hmmm.... There needs to also be respect for human dignity. Situations like this can be debated ad nauseum without any one changing their opinion, it's a very personal thing. This is why everyone needs to have Advance Directives drawn up indicating their medical wishes before a catastrophic medical occurrence happens. My mother and father-in-law received hospice care before their deaths and I can tell you they perform a much needed survice. In order to be eligible for hospice it must be deemed that a person has a life expectancy of less than 10 months, you can't just put anybody into hospice. Having spend 35+ years in the medical field, I can tell you there are some things worse than death. I've seen them. a Subject: Re: Re: Long-term effects of dependencyTo: hyperaldosteronism Cc: "Clarence Grim" Date: Tuesday, August 31, 2010, 12:49 PM What is the prognosis? Is she comfortable. What does she want to do? These are questions that must be considered. Many times proper medical care is to know when to stop "care". We can prolong "life" in many circumstances but at a cost of increasing suffering. Clearly a cost benefit analysis that all of will need to make some day. CE Grim MD My friend's mother would not live long if they pull out her feeding tube as they want to do. She'd starve to death. Without question, I'm sure Kaiser thinks that would be less expensive than giving her proper medical care. They are demanding a doctor who has respect for life. Whether they get it with Kaiser is another question. If she can hang on four more months, she can escape Kaiser. Val From: hyperaldosteronism [mailto:hyperaldosteronism ] On Behalf Of Francis Bill SUSPECTED PA To be put on hospice you have to have Dr say very unlikely you will live more then 6 more months. Not all Hospice work the same. From what I know about hospice one should ask a lot of questions and make good plans as to what is to be done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 2010 Report Share Posted August 31, 2010 You get what you pay for.CE Grim MDThe point is that I will not be able to use my insurance because I have no intention of playing nice with a government doctor. The point is I will have NO CHOICE in insurance. In time, if the socialists get their way, no one will have any choice in doctors either unless they take advantage of medical travel businesses like that of my U.S. Representative, Polis. Already, I have friends who get all their routine care done in Panama. Val From: hyperaldosteronism [mailto:hyperaldosteronism ] On Behalf Of Clarence Grim No you will still be able to pay him. At least I would ask if he will not still take your money. God bless America. My doctor doesn't accept any insurance, Medicare or otherwise. Right now, I can turn his bills in once I hit the deductible. Once I have to go on Medicare, no part of his bills can be submitted to my "insurance" - Medicare - ever! Never! Because he is not a government sanctioned physician. Mind you, those on Medicare cannot buy anything else. Medicare is their ONLY CHOICE. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 2010 Report Share Posted August 31, 2010 But the point is 1) I have NO CHOICE in what I buy for insurance 2) I cannot use my insurance because I won't go to a government doctor. 3) Medicare is good only as long as you do things the government's way This is the socialist's scheme for wrapping everyone into the nice socialized package where choice is a thing of the past, and government controls everything. How much money I have to pay my doc is irrelevant. How long I may have that right is a serious question. Val From: hyperaldosteronism [mailto:hyperaldosteronism ] On Behalf Of Clarence Grim You can still pay your Dr directly I suspect. On Aug 31, 2010, at 11:53 AM, Valarie wrote: I can turn my bills into Blue Cross even though my doc doesn't directly accept any insurance. Once I meet the deductible, I can either use the insurance at time of service, or send the claims in later. When I have to be in Medicare because I have NO CHOICE, I cannot turn any of his bills over to (even if they are catastrophic) my " insurance " because my doc is not a government-sanctioned physician. If I had choice, that would be different, but I will have NO CHOICE in where I buy insurance. This is government very directly inserting itself between my doctor and me. Only if I play fair (go to a government docto r) do I get to use my insurance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 2010 Report Share Posted August 31, 2010 A very nice Freudian slip you made. You may have coined a new word.much needed survice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 2010 Report Share Posted August 31, 2010 Typo, sorry, service. Maybe Freudian slip, survive? much needed survice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 2010 Report Share Posted August 31, 2010 But the point is1) I have NO CHOICE in what I buy for insuranceI just googled Health Insurance Companies and got: 61,700,000 hits. Pretty good choice it would seem to me.2) I cannot use my insurance because I won't go to a government doctor.That is your choice so you do have a choice.3) Medicare is good only as long as you do things the government's wayWhich we can hope is the best way to get the most good to the most folks. This is the socialist's scheme for wrapping everyone into the nice socialized package where choice is a thing of the past, and government controls everything. How much money I have to pay my doc is irrelevant. How long I may have that right is a serious question. Val From: hyperaldosteronism [mailto:hyperaldosteronism ] On Behalf Of Clarence Grim You can still pay your Dr directly I suspect. I can turn my bills into Blue Cross even though my doc doesn't directly accept any insurance. Once I meet the deductible, I can either use the insurance at time of service, or send the claims in later. When I have to be in Medicare because I have NO CHOICE, I cannot turn any of his bills over to (even if they are catastrophic) my "insurance" because my doc is not a government-sanctioned physician. If I had choice, that would be different, but I will have NO CHOICE in where I buy insurance. This is government very directly inserting itself between my doctor and me. Only if I play fair (go to a government docto r) do I get to use my insurance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 2010 Report Share Posted August 31, 2010 That what I was thinking a combo of hospice and survive but also has the last 3 letters from nice in it.CE Grim MDTypo, sorry, service. Maybe Freudian slip, survive? much needed survice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 2010 Report Share Posted August 31, 2010 I don't necessarily disagree with you. If people were paying their own bills, up to some catastrophic limit, they would be far more careful to shop and spend wisely - assuming prices were transparent and price discrimination was illegal. Competition breeds efficiency. I agree with you that " Doctors need to be able to doctor freely - not be restricted by the parameters set by individual insurance companies … " I also contend that doctors need to be able to doctor freely - not be restricted by some unelected, unaccountable termination panel in Washington. No one needs to read any fearmongering. The bill says it all. I've read most of it. Insurance companies stand to do well and have been generally supportive of this socialization. They get to do lots more business with a captive consumer. This was a golden egg for them. Already, they are raising premiums by double digits. I am reminded of the young woman who nearly died from Lyme in Canada because she could not get help. She ended up in the U.S. http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/WFive/20091113/w5_lyme_091114/ Why do you suppose your Canadian prime minister came to the U.S. for his heart surgery? What about others? What are they trying to escape? I understand what I write is disconcerting, but the more we know, the better. Val From: hyperaldosteronism [mailto:hyperaldosteronism ] On Behalf Of chipmunkzone Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 11:35 AM To: hyperaldosteronism Subject: Re: Long-term effects of dependency They are demanding a doctor who has respect for life. Here in Canada it would be the family fighting for the feeding tube removal, not an insurance company. Hubby just underwent bypass surgery in March - 6 bypasses in one surgery. Cost to us - nil. If we had had to pay for this he would be dead cause we do/did not have the assets to cover the cost. Change is always scary with many believing better the devil you know than the devil you don't. In my opinion no plan is perfect for everyone but it is obvious what the public perceives to have been working in the United states has actually only been working for those few who can afford it and even then, it still comes down to the insurance wanting to provide profits to their shareholders rather than what would be the best care of the people who are paying the premiums. I would be questioning who the actual fearmongerers are. In all likelihood all/most of the negativity would/could be traced back to an insurance company. They feed off the fear they have instilled in the public and are laughing all the way to the bank. Doctors need to be able to doctor freely - not be restricted by the parameters set by individual insurance companies, not to even mention the drug companies who only provide the information they want in order to get the doctors to prescribe their meds over a competitor. I would hazard a guess that many docors spend more time reading to keep up with the various insurance changes than reading up on new research findings. The movie SHREK comes to mind - " Change is good donkey! " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.