Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re:Pacifica branding

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

I did not open the link to the story although I was interested in it and then

read your message about a malicious script so I decided to not open it but... I

have seen the pacifica brand at Whole Foods too and did not for a minute think

that they were natural.

So here is my question: what is the legislation around branding perfumes

natural? In organic foods I think there are several levels: you can name your

stuff organic if something like 30% of it is organic (whatever that means: do

you tend to eat only the first third of the organic cucumber you buy and if so

which end of the cuke is the one that's organic!?) but in order to have the

Certified Organic label you need to have it all be organic and only use organic

facilities. So what about perfumes!? WF does distribute a number of perfume

brands that have the " natural look " and do all they can, image-wise, to make

unaware customers THINK that they are buying something totally natural. Some of

my clients think that even the body splashes distributed in malls with names

like " boysenberry maple " or " sugar vanilla blossom " are " natural " and need to be

educated. It does not even occur to most buyers that at $12 for three bottles

of 3.3floz, these things are

completely chemical! Of course, when you are at Whole Foods, you believe that

you are buying good natural stuff. Unless properly educated anything that says

" natural " or has a small advertising/packaging gimmick making people think that

you are natural, will sell as natural! Have you never met people who think that

your natural EOs and absolutes smell too chemical because natural perfume

" should " smell like the pacificas and others ?!

So, after my ranting... what is (if any) the legislation that allows a brand to

claim their product is natural? Are you natural if you have 1, 5, 25% of

natural EOs in the bottle? Are you natural if you " only " use 1, 5 or 25% of

aromachems? Or are you only allowed by law to " trick " customers into believing

they are buying natural with advertising, packaging gimmicks while staying legal

by having a list of real ingredients (the bad 26, dpg, alc, water) written in

very small letters at the bottom of your bottle?

Thanks for bringing up this interesting point!

Marc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...