Guest guest Posted August 16, 2002 Report Share Posted August 16, 2002 In response to Dr. Siff's comments concerning this article, I would first like to thank him for his input. His time is appreciated. The Health and Fitness Industry desperately needs checks and balances. It must also be stated that just as the reader needs to be aware of " misinformation " , they must also realize that any information can be scrutinized especially when taken out of context. With full respect for the Health and Fitness Industry as well as Dr. Siff, I take responsibility for the lack of explanation and clarity of the said article and wish to clarify here. As a beginning note, the magazine guidelines that this article was written by did not allow for references, so none could be provided. Regarding the terms " pronation " and " supination': these terms have been coined to refer to the tri-planar motion of the lower extremity (foot/ankle, knee, hip joint and L5-S1) during closed chain movements.1 The article states, " Pronation is the eccentric deceleration of forces that allows the body to store potential energy... " This was an oversimplification and in agreement with Dr. Siff, could be misleading. The term Pronation simply refers to the collective tri-planar joint actions of each respective joint from the foot to the hip (Table 1) that occurs in conjunction with " closed chain " eccentric muscle action for force reduction/absorption such as that seen during foot contact during walking, stepping, running, or descending during a squat and/or the leg press. Thus the term Supination simply refers to the collective tri-planar joint actions of each respective joint from the foot to the hip (Table 1) that occurs in conjunction with " closed chain " concentric muscle action for force production such as that seen in push off during walking, stepping, running, or ascending during squatting and/or the leg press. This was expressed in the preceding paragraphs that were not mentioned in the critique, " Functional biomechanics consists of movements termed pronation and supination seen in Table 1. Traditionally, pronation and supination have been used to describe motions of the forearm and/or the foot and ankle complex. However, because the joints of the body are all connected, what happens at one joint directly effects the others and thus these terms will be used to describe the multiplanar motion throughout the lower extremity in this article " Again the reader is cautioned to examine criticism with all of the pertinent information. Therefore, while Dr. Siff spent much of his critique on the motions of the foot, the foot is only one component of the lower extremity discussed in this article. All major joints of the lower extremity were collectively discussed as they are collectively used in functional activities. TABLE 1 PRONATION: Foot/ankle Dorsiflexion (sagittal) Eversion (frontal) Abduction (transverse) Knee Flexion (sagittal) Adduction (frontal) Internal Rotation (transverse) Hip Flexion (sagittal) Adduction (frontal) Internal rotation (transverse) SUPINATION: Foot/ankle Plantarflexion (sagittal) Inversion (frontal) Adduction (transverse) Knee Extension (sagittal) Abduction (frontal) External Rotation (transverse) Hip Extension (sagittal) Abduction (frontal) External rotation (transverse) With regard to transverse plane motion, Dr. Siff points out, " ...that rotation occurs about an axis and does not take place in any plane like the transverse plane. " Well, in general most joint motion is rotary in nature and therefore rotates about an axis. Depending on the motion performed, however, (Flexion/extension, Add/abduction or rotation) the orientation of the axis will differ from a Coronal (Medial/lateral) axis, to an Anterior/posterior axis, to a Longitudinal (Vertical) axis, respectively and thus be positioned in a different relative plane of motion.2 Of course we know that " planes of motion " are imaginary so this is all just semantics, but necessary for most all readers to establish a visual representation to aid in the learning of information. Lastly, I respectfully disagree with Dr. Siff's comment concerning foot motion, " ...so, the primary question arises -- how is it possible to pronate OR supinate the foot without any lateral movement or rotation of the foot in any direction? The knees may undergo valgus or varus tilting and hip motion may occur, but if the soles of the feet remain fully flat on any surface, they cannot undergo any marked degree of pronation or supination (other than a mild tendency to attempt to do so in some individuals) " AND " the attention paid here to the largely insignificant actions of foot pronation and supination is unwarranted. There are far more important issues to be addressed. " How does the foot pronate and supinate during walking and running when the foot is on the ground? It has to pronate in order to properly absorb and distribute the ground reaction forces in an eccentric manner and then supinate to stiffen and provide the proper rigid lever to allow force production in a concentric manner.1,2,3 During the initial foot contact and stance phases of gait (eccentric), the tibia moves anteriorly over a fixed foot (causing dorsiflexion at the talocrural joint, eversion at the subtalar joint and translates into internal rotation at the tibia) while the opposite motions occur for late stance and push off phases.2,3 This is the same manner the lower extremity functions during a leg press or squat. Anyone who has ever watched someone squat or perform a leg press without shoes on and knows what to look for can attest to this, I assure you. Here is a simple exercise that anyone who reads this can try. Stand up wherever you are right now and simply squat up and down a few times ( if you have a mirror this will work better). Note what is happening at your feet and knees especially. Does the orientation of the patella deviate medially or laterally in relation to the 2nd & 3rd toes? What does the foot and ankle do on the descent? Just pay attention for a couple of reps and you'll be surprised what you see. Anecdotally everyday in our (NASM) clinic, we have video analysis and goniometric data to support the movement, over-movement or lack of movement associated with the foot/ankle complex and how this relates to various injuries and dysfunctions. We are more than willing to demonstrate this to anyone whom is interested in seeing it done practically (live!) and not just reading about it. Knowledge that is never applied can never become wisdom. The motion of the foot is very significant because it will dictate the motions of the joints above it.1,2,3 If the proper foot/ankle mechanics do not occur, than the tibia/fibula cannot have proper motion. The tibia/fibula is connected to the femur and hip/pelvis via IT band, Hamstring muscles and Quadriceps muscles, Sartorius, Tensor fascia lata (via IT Band) and Gracilis (amongst other connective tissue). So, if the tibia/fibula does not move in the appropriate fashion, how can the femur and pelvis move appropriately? If the pelvis is attached to the lumbar spine via the sacrum and all concerned muscles and connected tissues, then can't the motion of the foot also affect the lumbar spine? Any wonder there is over 80% of the American population with back pain?4 As an industry we must begin to look at the human body as a whole whereby the muscles, connective tissues, nerves and skeleton work together synergistically to allow for proper motion and any alteration in one of these components causes increased stress to the others as indicative of the low back pain seen in this country (as an example).5 Sincerely, Rodney Corn MA, PES, CSCS Director of Education National Academy of Sports Medicine rodney@... www.nasm.org References: 1) Bronner S. Functional rehabilitation of the spine: The lumbopelvis as a key point of control. Chapter 5. In Brownstein B, Bronner S (eds.). Evaluation, treatment and outcomes: Functional movement in orthopaedic and sports physical therapy. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1997. p.194. 2) Neumann DA. Kinesiology of the musculoskeletal system. Foundations for physical rehabilitation. St. Louis, MI: Mosby, Inc.; 2002. 3) Nordin M, le VH (sic). Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system. 3rd edition. Philedelphia: Lippincott & Wilkins; 2001. 4) Whiting WC, Zernicke RF. Biomechanics of musculoskeletal injury. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1998. 5) Panjabi MM. The stabilizing system of the spine. Part 1: Function, dysfunction, adaptation and enhancement. J Spinal Disord 1992;5:383-9. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.