Guest guest Posted August 8, 2002 Report Share Posted August 8, 2002 The original question given was regarding the training of form in the deadlift - so I'll address that then the issues given by your comments too. I maintain it's necessary to train the deadlift - and for those lifters whose best lift IS the pull, why wouldn't you train it as a form lift? From what I've always heard of Lamar Gant, he trained his deadlift hard and heavy. He didn't leave his form to chance - and from the looks of the program posted to PLUSA it was more than a challenging routine - I myself would hesitate to use that one, the volume at high levels might not be in my best lifting interest! And Lamar was undeniably strong, with or without a SUIT! you cannot say he got oh 300 lbs of a deadlift suit...<laughing>. I'd say the MOST he could have gotten given suits previously available maybe 30-50 lbs? tops? That still leaves Lamar pulling around 650 or better by his own body strength.... and for reference he shows when he suggests putting the suit on (the routine published this year in PLUSA). With regard to your comments - I'm a lifetime drug free lifter. No you probably can't prove that - beyond interviewing my family, friends, and the fact I've taken and passed the USAPL tests, including OMT, and one IOC test for IPF WMR (yup. success = drug testing, even when you personally haven't ever done anything to worry about...lol). I also have a good pull without my suit - easily over 405 with a belt only - I did some reps recently out of curiosity as to that last cycle. I haven't maxed out raw in some time - it's not really appropriate for someone who is competing equipped. However, you don't get points in PL for not using what your competition uses within the rules (and certainly not at nationals or worlds, where the pounds count!) - and I do compete in the strictest federation with undeniably the toughest referees in the sport, coupled with drug testing and other means of leveling the field. I also have sufficient strength that any day I care to, I will deadlift 4 plates wihout a suit, just my belt (as long as I'm not pregnant or dead, the only 2 conditions that could prevent me at this time...). As a conventional puller (reference research briefs posted otherwise previously on ST regarding the actions of ab rectus in the conventional pull) I DO use a belt. IF we are to go by your commentary here, we should not use belts either, to be ENTIRELY RAW? I do know a few competitors here in Colorado who use neither belt nor suit in the deadlift...part of it being for comfort - they tend to be large heavy men with big waists, and belt and suit make it IMPOSSIBLE for them to reach the bar. For a guy to deadlift 725 without either belt or suit? I also saw a 198'er here do 680 to open in belt only....(plus some of these suits are hardly suits, they are more honorary singlets having been stretched out and never taken in....caught 1 guy here sleeping in an alleged Squat suit at a meet.....!) Which federations do you compete in? or have you ever competed powerlifting? I'm just curious as to what you have done in this sport that you dislike the usage of equipment so drastically. There is no rule in place in USAPL that requires the usage of suits - I think there might be some " raw " competitions in usapl and also AAU, other federations. You are always free to compete without steroids, without suits, without anything but your own self, you must however wear a singlet and other basic clothing.... Oh and one more point - are you going to outlaw sumo then as unfair - for the shorter lockout? that too can be a point given some of the more recent controversy about bench lockouts being extremely short.... Nothing is ever easy in powerlifting, it's a sport with many federations and no answers at this point in time. I'm sure if you want to compete drug free raw you can find someone who will test you and also approve of your lifting in such a fashion - perhaps you can set records there. But the comments regarding equipment need to realize that people have to always be strong BEFORE the addition of any equipment - I am not buying that Lamar couldn't pull pretty close to his records wihtout a suit...and at 132 that's undeniably strong anywhere you like to take it! I know I can at this time, pull close to my own IPF WMR without my suit. I agree wiht the limitations strictly placed on the lifts, the use of nothing that IOC does not permit with regard to supplements, and the strict limitations on equipment as ruled by USAPL and IPF. I choose to compete there, to support them with my money, my time, and my lifting. So I suggest that if you can find one you like, support it by way of your competing and other means, volunteer to keep the federation alive. It's really all anyone who wishes PL competitions to continue can do. Support what you believe in, and continue to lift. Perhaps someone else in our wideflung membership here at ST will know of the rest of the raw federations - or there may be more listed in your PLUSA or by web search. With regard to your commentary on high jumpers - I'm not qualified to comment there. I don't think a bench shirt would aid a discus thrower (as I AM qualfied to comment on discus, having formerly competed that event.) so perhaps there is not much parallel to your high jumper scenario. Good luck in your future lifting, The Phantom aka Schaefer, CMT, CSCS, competing powerlifter Denver, Colorado, USA Powerlifting and Lifting Aids >Was: Deadlift Myths > >Mel Siff: > ><< If you can do well in the deadlift without much technical training in this lift, we are >then forced to conclude that it cannot be very technically demanding. Any comments? >> > >** From what I've heard, the real skill is overcoming suit resistance and pulling >oneself down to the bottom starting position--the suit then overcomes the >greater(%?) part of overcoming inertia. Are there any suit-free lifters with >an opinion --or at the risk of showing my age and ignorance--any suit-free, >drug-free lifters with an opinion? > >I don't even care to hear about poundages anymore--unless its a drug clean and raw >meet--and from what I understand there's no way to really test for drugs. Why >don't they just use a crane as a lifting aid? What powerlifting used to be has now >become far more a matter of equipment and supplementation than unaided strength. > >I'm surprised high jumpers haven't used these suits--then again, it would take >some pretty strong hip flexors to get the take-off leg in position--maybe they >could use a one-legged suit, hop down the approach on the non-garmented leg, >hop up in the air descending on the garmented leg and use the stored elastic >energy generated during the descent for the takeoff. Now we have a new topic >to debate -- does a stretch suit have a stretch reflex--at what decel/acceleration ? > >Jerry Telle >Lakewood Colorado USA >jrtelle@... > > > > > > >Modify or cancel your subscription here: > >http://groups.yahoo.com/mygroups > >Don't forget to sign all letters with full name and city of residence if you >wish them to be published! > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 8, 2002 Report Share Posted August 8, 2002 Schaefer writes: <Good luck in your future lifting,> ** Hi -- The lifts you mentioned and your honesty were worthy criteria for apraisal(admitedly mine) and are quite impressive. I guess if one of your goals in life is to compete and compete sucessfully then you have to use aids--lifting clean is proof your whole soul is not for sale. Maybe the sport could be renamed -- power assisted lifting. If you can demonstrate to me how, what I can lift(ed) matters in any of this--I'll be glad to pass it on. <Oh and one more point - are you going to outlaw sumo then as unfair - for the shorter lockout? that too can be a point given some of the more recent controversy about bench lockouts being extremely short....> ** No more than I would have disallowed Anallos long arms or Lamars scoliosis--though the point COULD be argued-Super wide foot placement that is. There is still a grip width for the bench isnt there? <Nothing is ever easy in powerlifting, it's a sport with many federations and no answers at this point in time.> ** How many Olympic lifting federations are there? They had to drop the press(sadly) due to definition/judging problems--what about the sport inhibits powerlifting organizations from getting together and deriving a common definition? <But the comments regarding equipment need to realize that people have to always be strong BEFORE the addition of any equipment - > ** Then why use the equipment ? Are we comparing strength or equipment--maybe certain body configurations are assisted to different degreees. Or are we comparing (not in your case) who has the greatest salary/pharamacy bill? <I am not buying that Lamar couldn't pull pretty close to his records wihtout a suit... and at 132 that's undeniably strong anywhere you like to take it! I know I can at this time, pull close to my own IPF WMR without my suit..> ** I couldn't agree with you more--but now we'll never know. <I choose to compete there, to support them with my money, my time, and my lifting> ** Well I admit your spirit and conviction help explain and justify (to me), much about your involvement. If you were asked to vote for clean and raw would you? <With regard to your commentary on high jumpers - I'm not qualified to comment there. I don't think a bench shirt would aid a discus thrower (as I AM qualfied to comment on discus, having formerly competed that event.) so perhaps there is not much parallel to your high jumper scenario.> ** The high jumper scenario was more of a caricature of lifting suits than anything to be considered. I have no doubt that proprely designed suits would aid discus and probably shot, especially rotary throwers/puters. The throwing arm would be constrained forward and the lead arm back so that some one approaching the ring would be held in a one arm forward one arm back and prerotated/torqued trunk position as opposed to the arms forward sleep walking pose of the bench presser. My best wishes to you Jerry Telle Lakewood Colorado USA jrtelle@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 8, 2002 Report Share Posted August 8, 2002 << [Of course, someone is going to ask these questions, so I had better start the ball rolling: " So all other sports are totally clean of drugs? " What about help from their own types of mechanical aid, like padded football gear, swimming and cycling suits, running spikes and springy sprint tracks and special composite poles...? " No, it is not only powerlifting which needs to be scrutinised in this manner, but all sports, especially those professional sports where cover-ups are rife, drug tests are often a farce and large sums of money are involved. The saying: " He who is without sin, throw the first stone " comes to mind. This is not to condone the use of any legal or illegal " ergogenic aids, but simply to point out the huge hypocrisy that is rife in sport today. We might even turn our critical spotlight on film and pop stars who are never tested for drugs before they perform, yet they are adored by millions despite all their misdemeanours. If we are going to be so intolerant about certain athletes, then we had better be fair and be equally intolerant to all hero figures and leaders in our modern world. Mel Siff] >> Amen, though I'm not in total accord with " equally intolerant " , A free press is the key to democracy, get all these cards on the table and let us decide--its time that imagery(visual) is recognized for what it is --Tolstoy? said, " What a strange illusion it is to suppose that beauty is goodness " Jerrry Telle Lakewood Colorado USA jrtelle@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 8, 2002 Report Share Posted August 8, 2002 Kennely lift at the WABDL meet was a exhibition lift. The shirt he used was not legal in WABDL. Since he was only doing an exhibition he was not eligible for drugtesting, and his lift wont be a record in the WABDL. No looking away or hypocrisy. Im pretty sure that Kennely would be one of the strongest benchers with or without equipment. /Niels Stærkjær Denmark Powerlifting and Lifting Aids > I would like to echo Mr. Telle's comments on the outlandish numbers achieved > in various lifts in the sport of powerlifting. As well i do not want to hear > anymore about these so called records when they are obviously due to special > suits and drugs. I guess the goal is to train for the suit because all in > all isn't that really the goal. Guys like Dave Tate stuggled he said six > years to add an incredible 15 pounds to his bench record to finally hit the > 600 pound mark.... and yeah what do you know triple poly suits are know out and > finally 600 pounds. Then there is Kennelly with an 800 lb bench press. > One statement i heard was Kennelly is " god " and i guess some people were born > to bench. This is ridiculous. Yeah, way to go, you are my hero. I will > think of you on Sundays when i am attending my local church. > > But yet some continue to deny carryover numbers and influence of drugs. I > mean i saw on the WABDL (world association of bench and deadlifting) that > Kennelly competes in and they claim to test for steroids, clenbuterol, > and speed, as well as abnormally high testosterone levels. How blind can you > be? I guess when someone is producing the best numbers out there and they are > in your organization then it is time to look away. > > What a shame. What a joke. > > [Of course, someone is going to ask these questions, so I had better start the ball > rolling: " So all other sports are totally clean of drugs? " What about help from > their own types of mechanical aid, like padded football gear, swimming and cycling > suits, running spikes and springy sprint tracks and special composite poles...? " > No, it is not only powerlifting which needs to be scrutinised in this manner, but all > sports, especially those professional sports where cover-ups are rife, drug tests > are often a farce and large sums of money are involved. The saying: " He who is > without sin, throw the first stone " comes to mind. This is not to condone the use of > any legal or illegal " ergogenic aids, but simply to point out the huge hypocrisy that > is rife in sport today. We might even turn our critical spotlight on film and pop > stars who are never tested for drugs before they perform, yet they are adored by > millions despite all their misdemeanours. If we are going to be so intolerant about > certain athletes, then we had better be fair and be equally intolerant to all hero > figures and leaders in our modern world. Mel Siff] > > Diamond CSCS > Mesa, Arizona > > * Don't forget to sign all letters with full name and city of residence if you > wish them to be published! > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 8, 2002 Report Share Posted August 8, 2002 Please check your facts, sir, before making offensive statements with such resolve. I have followed Dave's progress for the last 3 years. The man has gone through hell. After tearing his pecs several times (if I remember correctly, I think he tore his shoulder too), his bench went down to mid 500. After finally figuring out what training he will respond to best, he finally hit his 600 (a net increase of 15 but in reality, an increase of 55 lbs because his last best was 545). He did not use a shirt any different than before. Regardless of the shirt they use, there are perhaps 40 people in the world who can bench press over 700 lbs (I haven't checked the latest top 100). Only one other person has been recognized with an 800 lb press - . Kennelly is #2. Do you know how many people there are in the world today? Can you divide? Kennelly did not compete in the WABDL, he was a guest lifter performing an exhibition. So what he wore or what he has in his blood is not of their concern because he is not staking claim at the meet winning total, much less the federation's records. If he is claiming he is drugfree then I would agree that it's silly and hypocritical but I'm not aware that he has. There are many fanatic cults (often referred to as religions) and powerlifting happens to be one of them. And when some of them go to their church, they will indeed think of him for in the world of benchpressing, Kennelly is currently the almighty - the one who has done what others only dream of. You can be as condescending as you like to satisfy yourself as never having to strive for such levels because as we all know, if you were to take enough steroids and wear enough layers, you could do it any day of the week and twice on Sunday. One of my favourite sayings that Louie has is " I have a bottle of test on a triple ply shirt in the back and I have yet to see it lift an ounce " . Look, the point is that these are still the strongest men in the world. Shirt or no shirt, drugs or no drugs. They all wear and take them. 800 may be a superficial number from one point of view but that doesn't defeat the fact that it's the biggest. When you succeed in topping it since it's such a joke, be sure to let PLUSA know and they'll stick your name on top of the list of the strongest men out of the 6+ billion living in the world today. What I think is a shame is how someone claiming to be a professional in the field can take such blindly absolutist views on an aspect of it. I hope none of your clients are aspiring powerlifters lest you tell them their dreams are a shame and a joke. Please don't be so fast to dump on things. Dmitry Voronov Toronto, Ontario JRDthreeD@... wrote: > I would like to echo Mr. Telle's comments on the outlandish numbers > achieved > in various lifts in the sport of powerlifting. As well i do not want > to hear > anymore about these so called records when they are obviously due to > special > suits and drugs. I guess the goal is to train for the suit because > all in > all isn't that really the goal. Guys like Dave Tate stuggled he said six > years to add an incredible 15 pounds to his bench record to finally > hit the > 600 pound mark.... and yeah what do you know triple poly suits are > know out and > finally 600 pounds. Then there is Kennelly with an 800 lb bench > press. > One statement i heard was Kennelly is " god " and i guess some people > were born > to bench. This is ridiculous. Yeah, way to go, you are my hero. > I will > think of you on Sundays when i am attending my local church. > > But yet some continue to deny carryover numbers and influence of > drugs. I > mean i saw on the WABDL (world association of bench and deadlifting) that > Kennelly competes in and they claim to test for steroids, > clenbuterol, > and speed, as well as abnormally high testosterone levels. How blind > can you > be? I guess when someone is producing the best numbers out there and > they are > in your organization then it is time to look away. > > What a shame. What a joke. > > [Of course, someone is going to ask these questions, so I had better > start the ball > rolling: " So all other sports are totally clean of drugs? " What > about help from > their own types of mechanical aid, like padded football gear, > swimming and cycling > suits, running spikes and springy sprint tracks and special composite > poles...? " > No, it is not only powerlifting which needs to be scrutinised in this > manner, but all > sports, especially those professional sports where cover-ups are rife, > drug tests > are often a farce and large sums of money are involved. The saying: > " He who is > without sin, throw the first stone " comes to mind. This is not to > condone the use of > any legal or illegal " ergogenic aids, but simply to point out the huge > hypocrisy that > is rife in sport today. We might even turn our critical spotlight on > film and pop > stars who are never tested for drugs before they perform, yet they are > adored by > millions despite all their misdemeanours. If we are going to be so > intolerant about > certain athletes, then we had better be fair and be equally intolerant > to all hero > figures and leaders in our modern world. Mel Siff] > > Diamond CSCS > Mesa, Arizona > > * Don't forget to sign all letters with full name and city of > residence if you > wish them to be published! > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 10, 2002 Report Share Posted August 10, 2002 Well and I will go one further Niels. Someone else asked me the other day - will there be 700 lb benches in the IPF? I had to say no - not likely, with the 2-3 second pauses, and the single ply shirt, and drug testing. I'm not sure we'll see one for some time. What's your opinion? The Phantom aka Schaefer, CMT, CSCS, competing powerlifter Denver, Colorado USA PS Perhaps Niels himself will have the first IPF 700 bench...<how are you doing of late? lol...> -----Original Message----- Kennely lift at the WABDL meet was a exhibition lift. The shirt he used was not legal in WABDL. Since he was only doing an exhibition he was not eligible for drugtesting, and his lift wont be a record in the WABDL. No looking away or hypocrisy. Im pretty sure that Kennely would be one of the strongest benchers with or without equipment. ----- > I would like to echo Mr. Telle's comments on the outlandish numbers achieved > in various lifts in the sport of powerlifting. As well i do not want to hear > anymore about these so called records when they are obviously due to special > suits and drugs. I guess the goal is to train for the suit because all in > all isn't that really the goal. Guys like Dave Tate stuggled he said six > years to add an incredible 15 pounds to his bench record to finally hit the > 600 pound mark.... and yeah what do you know triple poly suits are know out and > finally 600 pounds. Then there is Kennelly with an 800 lb bench press. > One statement i heard was Kennelly is " god " and i guess some people were born > to bench. This is ridiculous. Yeah, way to go, you are my hero. I will > think of you on Sundays when i am attending my local church. > > But yet some continue to deny carryover numbers and influence of drugs. I > mean i saw on the WABDL (world association of bench and deadlifting) that > Kennelly competes in and they claim to test for steroids, clenbuterol, > and speed, as well as abnormally high testosterone levels. How blind can you > be? I guess when someone is producing the best numbers out there and they are > in your organization then it is time to look away. > > What a shame. What a joke.... * Don't forget to sign all letters with full name and city of residence if you wish them to be published! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 10, 2002 Report Share Posted August 10, 2002 benched 710 RAW! It's official in the IPF records. I'm sure Midote will hit it very soon. So will some Russian guys. Dmitry Voronov Toronto, Ontario Schaefer wrote: >Well and I will go one further Niels. > >Someone else asked me the other day - will there be 700 lb benches in the >IPF? > >I had to say no - not likely, with the 2-3 second pauses, and the single ply >shirt, and drug testing. I'm not sure we'll see one for some time. > >What's your opinion? > >The Phantom >aka Schaefer, CMT, CSCS, competing powerlifter >Denver, Colorado USA > >PS Perhaps Niels himself will have the first IPF 700 bench...<how are you >doing of late? lol...> > >-----Original Message----- > > > > Kennely lift at the WABDL meet was a exhibition lift. >The shirt he used was not legal in WABDL. >Since he was only doing an exhibition he was not eligible for drugtesting, >and his lift wont be a record in the WABDL. >No looking away or hypocrisy. >Im pretty sure that Kennely would be one of the strongest benchers with or >without equipment. > >----- > > > >>I would like to echo Mr. Telle's comments on the outlandish numbers achieved >>in various lifts in the sport of powerlifting. As well i do not want to hear >>anymore about these so called records when they are obviously due to special >>suits and drugs. I guess the goal is to train for the suit because all in >>all isn't that really the goal. Guys like Dave Tate stuggled he said six >>years to add an incredible 15 pounds to his bench record to finally hit the >>600 pound mark.... and yeah what do you know triple poly suits are know out and >>finally 600 pounds. Then there is Kennelly with an 800 lb bench press. >>One statement i heard was Kennelly is " god " and i guess some people were born >>to bench. This is ridiculous. Yeah, way to go, you are my hero. I will >>think of you on Sundays when i am attending my local church. >> >>But yet some continue to deny carryover numbers and influence of drugs. I >>mean i saw on the WABDL (world association of bench and deadlifting) that >> Kennelly competes in and they claim to test for steroids, clenbuterol, >>and speed, as well as abnormally high testosterone levels. How blind can you >>be? I guess when someone is producing the best numbers out there and they are >>in your organization then it is time to look away. >> >>What a shame. What a joke.... >> > >* Don't forget to sign all letters with full name and city of residence if you > wish them to be published! > > > > > > > >Modify or cancel your subscription here: > >http://groups.yahoo.com/mygroups > >Don't forget to sign all letters with full name and city of residence if you >wish them to be published! > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 10, 2002 Report Share Posted August 10, 2002 At 11:37 AM -0600 8/10/02, Schaefer wrote: >Well and I will go one further Niels. > >Someone else asked me the other day - will there be 700 lb benches in the >IPF? > >I had to say no - not likely, with the 2-3 second pauses, and the single ply >shirt, and drug testing. I'm not sure we'll see one for some time. > >What's your opinion? Where have you been ? The IPF Bench Press record was set by in 1997 without a bench shirt. 320 kgs (705 lbs). And Hidote is only 40 lbs off in the 3 lift and has a good shot at making 700. So my opinion is we will see it. :^) Hobman Saskatoon, Canada Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 10, 2002 Report Share Posted August 10, 2002 Apparently not paying as much attention to the bench as the deadlift.... I meant 800......<grinning> Mea Culpa, <laughing> Ok then what are the odds of an 800 bench in the IPF....a decade behind? how long was the lag in getting one 700 bench in IPF vs near 800 or close misses in the other parts of the PL world? Thanks for the info, and my apologies ....but with me it's several reps and a cloud of dust, competing soon (looking for an excuse hehe) .... it's the bench anyway, heck I actually took an interest! Schaefer Denver CO -----Original Message----- Schaefer wrote: >>Well and I will go one further Niels. >> >>Someone else asked me the other day - will there be 700 lb benches in the >>IPF? >> >>I had to say no - not likely, with the 2-3 second pauses, and the single ply >>shirt, and drug testing. I'm not sure we'll see one for some time. >> >>What's your opinion? > >Where have you been ? > >The IPF Bench Press record was set by in 1997 without a >bench shirt. 320 kgs (705 lbs). > >And Hidote is only 40 lbs off in the 3 lift and has a good shot at making 700. > >So my opinion is we will see it. >:^) > > Hobman * Don't forget to sign all letters with full name and city of residence if you wish them to be published! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 11, 2002 Report Share Posted August 11, 2002 At 10:48 PM -0600 8/10/02, Schaefer wrote: >Apparently not paying as much attention to the bench as the deadlift.... I >meant 800......<grinning> FWIW I don't think we'll be seeing an 800 lb bench without the heavy shirts for some time either. Hobman Saskatoon, Canada Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.