Guest guest Posted January 21, 2006 Report Share Posted January 21, 2006 This is such a personal decision. I think its best to do what you can. Your really not in a hurry to have them tested unless they are starting to have some symptoms. If you would like them tested now you can do hat too. I was told my older son had CMT in the emergency room after he twisted his ankle. I was pretty shocked. Then I knew my son Adam had CMT he was 3 or 4 at the time. Sure enough he had CMT. A year later I was told my daughter had CMT. I had my oldest daughter looked at. She did not have CMT. I had a new born baby that I could not bare to have tested. I had all the CMT news I could take so I let it ride. At almost 9 years old now he does not appear to have CMT. If I would have had him tested when I was so stressed out and depressed it would have been reason to cheer me up and maybe pull me out of some of the depression. If his tests would have come back CMT I would have been more of a wreck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 22, 2006 Report Share Posted January 22, 2006 What type do you have? If it's CMT1A, by all means, get them tested. It just requires a blood draw. I had my baby tested when I had an amnioscentesis. I didn't specifically have the test to find out about CMT but while they were testing I asked them to check for CMT at the same time. More invasive (or painful) tests like NCV and EMG's may not be warranted unless your children are having symptoms/problems. Even then, if you know what YOU have and they're having problems, then you'll know what THEY have. Why subject them to the tests? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 22, 2006 Report Share Posted January 22, 2006 Hi, as a dad of 3 I have very strong thoughts on this. Here is my thought process. 1. Once you know the symptoms of CMT you will have a good ides if you child has CMT., at least in a bad enough form you can tell. If no symptoms then no need to test as if they do have it, it can't be that bad. 2. If you get them tested and it is positive you now have to state that for Life Insurance applications, which could lead to them declining the application. 3. It they are positive and you tell them, it could " label " the child with their peers, could do more harm then good. Here is what I am going to do. I am pretty sure my 6 year old daughter has it, she used to wake up in the middle of the night screaming of pain in her foot. I have her on Low dose Vit C and it has helped alot. Although now if she has a very busy day running around she still gets the pain. I will not get her tested until after she is old enough to understand or if it gets so servere that she cannot handle the pain. Mostly I am doing this for insurance purposes. I have been declined once already and do not want her to through this. Hope this helps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 22, 2006 Report Share Posted January 22, 2006 That was about the only good thing about my kids having CMT. They didn't have any tests done other then a look and see at the doctor's office. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 22, 2006 Report Share Posted January 22, 2006 Although I have no children (it was a personal decision not to due to CMT) I had a EMG/NCV test done this past August. I was diagnosed with CMT at age 2 back in '73 but never knew what type & I really wanted to know for my own good. I thought that giving this test to a kid would not be a good thing. I thought I was gonna pass out at one point. I can handle pain (I don't have any from my CMT tho) but I almost cried. Even after they numb the area/s tested & you can take something prior to ease the pain. So if your kid/s don't absolutely need to be tested unless they progressly get worse, DON'T. JMHO. Kerry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 22, 2006 Report Share Posted January 22, 2006 >So if your kids don't absolutely need to be tested unless they progressively get worse, DON'T. JMHO.< I agree, blood test only, lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 23, 2006 Report Share Posted January 23, 2006 > > I have been back and forth about getting my children tested. I would > like to get some of your thoughts on this. > > What are the pros and cons of finding out if they have it also? > (I have small 5 children) If this is a no-brainer- please forgive me, > but I have just recently been diagnosed and all of this is new to me. > Any and all thoughts about this would be helpful. > > Thanks. > > MomOfMany Thank you all for the replies. My husband and I are more along the lines of not testing until they show symptoms. The reasons are basically the sam as the poster who replied, for it not to be on their medical record, not having them " labeled " and if there is not anything that can be done til they show symptoms, then there isn't much point. I just want to make sure I am making a wise decsion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 23, 2006 Report Share Posted January 23, 2006 Getting your children is a personal choice. I like everything I've heard lately from others. All good stuff. I have only one concern, and I have posted it before. That is insurance companies. If your child is tested these results go into his/her medical file. This becomes the dreaded " pre-existing condition " . Your children would probably have a hard time getting long-term disability insurance personally or through benefits that may be offered by the company they would may for in the future. I think that is one of the cons of getting your children tested. Regards, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 23, 2006 Report Share Posted January 23, 2006 I'm not really sure about this but I think makes a good point. My question is whether CMT counts as a pre-existing condition. I mean, some folks never have symptoms and others have lots. Just because you know that your genetic code has a hitch (and hey, whose doesn't? lol) that would make it a pre-existing condition? Seems to me that in the future when everyone knows so much more about genetics/DNA, EVERYONE will have a pre-existing condition of some sort?? Personally, my insurance hasn't ever considered CMT a pre-existing condition (life, medical, or long-term disability) and it's been in my records for a looonng time. ly, they probably have no clue as to what it is and just ignore it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 23, 2006 Report Share Posted January 23, 2006 I agree with the insurance issues of " pre-exisiting " conditions. We won't test our children until we have too for that reason. Both my husband and I are insurance agents for several individual companies, and it raises big problems. Too many doctor's have their opinions not medical facts in records!! And you have nightmares getting things removed that are incorrect from the record. Kids are 20, 18,16, 7. Thanks, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.