Guest guest Posted September 8, 2008 Report Share Posted September 8, 2008 Here's my research paper I just turned in about health care mishandling autism for critical thinking class. Please, please if you find a mistake don't tell me! I won't get my grade til Saturday, I'm already afraid he'll butcher it to pieces! Debi Autism. Each day we read and hear more about this mysterious condition affecting a new child every twenty minutes (Autism, 2008). What most people don’t know is that more children in 2008 will be diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder than pediatric AIDS, juvenile diabetes, or pediatric cancer combined (Autism, 2008). But unlike AIDS, diabetes, or cancer, health care for those with autism remains virtually impossible to find. Autism remains an untreated health problem because of mishandling from the health care community. Autism has been historically diagnosed as a mental health disorder. From the 1940’s to the late 1970’s autism was believed to be the result of bad parenting, called “refrigerator mother syndrome†(Rudy, 2006). From this idea of a behavioral disorder, psychologists and psychiatrists used the “Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders,†or DSM-IV to render an autism diagnosis. The DSM-IV lists at least two behaviors each impacting social, stereotypical, and language as criteria for autism. In the 1970’s emerging proof of autism as a biological condition ended this cold parenting idea but the treatment of autism as behavioral has continued to this day. Health care leaders such as the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) are still approving of this classification for autism (CDC, 2007). But if one looks deeper it becomes apparent that significant, multiple health issues contribute to this disorder. Autism has multiple medical associations. Gastrointestinal dysfunction is perhaps one of the most frequent problems plaguing those with autism, including ileo-colonic lymphoid nodular hyperplasia (Wakefield, 2005), entercolitis (Krigsman, 2007), chronic measles infection (Wakefield, 2002), and other conditions (Krigsman, 2007). Over 61% of those with autism tested have multiple signs of oxidative stress (, 2007) as well as around 55% with autism having increased MTHFR mutations compared with 35% of controls (Boris et al, 2004). Newer research continues to show immunological issues of autism in the body and the brain (Pessah et al, 2008). Increasing evidence shows neuroglial activation, suggesting an active neuroinflammatory state in the brain that impacts the cerebral cortex, white matter, and cerebellum (Vargas et al, 2005). There are multiple other physical issues associated with autism, but the point is clear: autism is largely a medical condition. Vaccines also remain a big issue in autism. Some parents have insisted for decades that their children were typical until getting vaccines, when they seemingly drifted away. The 2008 Hannah Poling case of vaccines having caused her autism was conceded by the United States Department of Health and Human Services and as a result granted financial compensation to the family; it created an entirely new round of vaccine-autism flurry (Young, 2008). In Hannah’s case the argument was vaccines caused “features of autism spectrum disorder†because of an underlying mitochondrial disorder. There is no difference between behaviors of autism and autism itself (Young, 2008). The vast majority of children born never receive any type of mitochondrial testing prior to their twenty-four hour-old vaccine, their two month-old vaccines, or any other vaccines. For these reasons, there is no data to support or deny just how many people with autism have similar situations as Hannah. A recent admission from former National Institutes of Health Director Dr. Bernadine Healy revealed autism-vaccine study researchers were directed to not find susceptible groups (Attkisson, 2008). Indeed, there is still a significant question of vaccines and autism. Dr. Healy was clear in her interview that vaccines have not been cleared from a link or cause to autism, and that government officials deliberately skewed study data in a 2004 report because the government feared damage to the vaccine program (Attkisson, 2008). The issue of vaccines and autism often begins at the pediatrician’s office. Vaccines are frequently administered by the pediatrician, who is also the first line of health care for a child who may develop or already have autism. Far too many times pediatricians have nothing to give for autism treatment. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has instructed its members to look for brain abnormalities (by a neurologist), test for lead poisoning, test for seizures (by a neurologist), and to test for a handful of genetic conditions (by a geneticist) (American, 2001). Beyond that there is nothing. No checking for gastrointestinal problems, no blood work for aberrant amino acids or oxidative stress, no immunological panels or hormonal testing, no organic acids testing for possible mitochondrial disorders. Nothing. Some argue that while a handful of unusually sick kids with autism may have issues, the vast majority of those with autism are otherwise healthy. Some argue there is no data showing an overwhelming health crisis in autism. Because of the good health, autism cannot be a medical condition and that it is the behaviors that are the issue of one with autism. If there is nothing to treat, there is nothing to treat. This argument is bad on several fronts. It is somewhat circular to argue there is no crisis because of any data and no data, therefore no crisis. It is unknown how many of those with autism do and do not receive proper testing. The only reliable data available shows significant health problems in those with autism. Because the data shows health problems and because the AAP does not support medical testing, there is no treatment of autism-associated medical conditions. Attend any large-scale autism conference or local autism support group meeting and one is likely to find parents perservating on the topic of health treatments for their child with autism. In the seven years since my own child’s autism diagnosis I have yet to attend a single autism meeting where health treatments do not emerge as the predominant topic. It is clear in the autism community that there are a significant number of children with autism who are not getting the health care they need from the health care community. Others argue that there is a large body of scientific evidence that has disproven the vaccine-autism connection, so vaccines are not an issue. Some argue that even if vaccines did cause autism the autism rates are around 1 in 150 and that far more children would have autism if vaccines truly caused it. There are studies promoted every few months in the news as finally disproving the vaccine-autism link. Therefore there is no vaccine-provoked autism. However, the large body of scientific evidence is only part of the vaccine-autism picture. Some of this mantra of constant disproving the connection is promoted by the news media. Most of those studies have had questionable data collection, manipulation of statistical findings, and even the wrong data sets (Kirby, 2005). It is impossible for studies that violate basic scientific methodology to prove/disprove vaccines as having a role in autism. There is a significant body of evidence showing vaccine-induced symptoms of autism, as well as some data showing a lower rate of autism in non-immunized children. (Olmsted, 2007; Blaxill, 2008). As Dr. Healy suggested, science should not refuse to look clearly at the issue because we are afraid of what we may find (Attkisson, 2008). Another argument against a medical diagnosis and treatment model for autism is that there isn’t an autism lab test. Because you cannot take a child who has the behaviors of autism into a laboratory and diagnosis autism blindly from a positive or negative specimen, a behavioral model from behavioral sciences is the best way to define those with autism and that it will actually help speed up the behavioral therapies that have been found to benefit. In recent decades the focus of an autism treatment model remains speech/language therapy for communication deficits, occupational/physical therapy for motor issues, and applied behavioral analysis for learning (ABA) (Autism, 2008). Behavioral interventions definitely have a place in autism treatment. But because behavioral interventions are helpful, it does not dismiss the profound suffering from untreated medical conditions or the need for medical treatment. The common cold, autoimmune conditions, and multiple other disease states do not have 100% laboratory diagnoses either, but it does not prevent the clinician from medically treating the patient with the best possible resources. Treating the physiology and rehabilitation, as is done with many conditions, provides the best possible outcomes. A growing field of autism using a medical model has emerged. This method of treating autism medically is called Defeat Autism Now! (DAN!) and there are new DAN! clinicians popping up across the country. DAN! uses scientific understanding and research to provide the safest, most cutting edge treatment protocols for the patient with autism (Pangborn, 2005). The DAN! protocols suggest multiple laboratory tests early on to define any underlying metabolic disorders or other problems such as autoinflammatory or nutritional deficits. The laboratory findings are then used to develop a child-specific program of healing that may include special diets, vitamin/mineral supplementation, as well as medications to manage gastrointestinal issues, inflammatory states, and neurotransmitter/hormonal imbalances. It is bias and prejudice that the health care community refuses to acknowledge in treating autism. It is time for health care providers to stop putting up glass walls when they see or hear the autism label and begin looking beyond outdated diagnostic methods to begin helping these children. Until they do, the health care community will continue to allow a generation of unnecessary suffering within the autism population. References American Academy of Pediatrics. The Pediatrician’s Role in the Diagnosis and Management of Autistic Spectrum Disorder in Children. Policy Statement. Pediatrics. 107(5), 1221-1226. Attkisson Sharyl. Leading Dr.: Vaccines-Autism Worth Study. CBS News. Retrieved August 25, 2008, http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/05/12/cbsnews_investigates/main4086809.shtml\ .. Autism Speaks. “Facts about Autism.†Retrieved August 14, 2008. http://www.autismspeaks.org/whatisit/facts.php Autism Speaks. “Treatments for Autism.†Retrieved September 1, 2008, http://www.autismspeaks.org/whattodo/index.php?WT.svl=Top_Nav Blaxill Mark. Olmsted. The Amish and Autism. Age of Autism. May 14, 2008. Retrieved September 2, 2008, http://www.ageofautism.com/2008/05/olsted-the-amis.html. Boris Marvin, Goldblatt Allan, Galanko ph, Jill. Association of MTHFR Gene Variants with Autism. Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, 9(4):106-108. Centers for Disease Control. Autism Information Center. July 3, 2007, Retrieved September 1, 2008, http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/overview_diagnostic_criteria.htm. , Jill. Oxidative Stress and the Metabolic Pathology of Autism. National Autism Association Conference 2007 Presentation. Kirby . Evidence of Harm. St. ’s Press. 2005. Olmsted Dan. The Age of Autism: Study sees vaccine risk. 2007. Retrieved September 3, 2008, http://www.generationrescue.org/olmstead.html. Pangborn Jon, Baker Sidney, Rimland, Bernard. Autism: Effective Biomedical Treatments. Autism Research Institute. 2nd Edition, September 2005. Pessah IN, Seegal RF, Lein PJ, LaSalle J, Yee BK, Van De Water J, Berman RF. Immunologic and neurodevelopmental susceptibilities of autism. Neurotoxicology, 2008, May;29(3):532-45. Rudy, Jo. Refrigerator Mothers. About.com 2006. Retrieved September 1, 2008, http://autism.about.com/od/causesofautism/p/refrigerator.htm Uhlmann V, CM, Sheils O, Pilkington L, Silva I, Killalea A, Murch SB, Young Alison. Georgia girl helps link autism to childhood vaccines. Atlanta-Journal Constitution. March 6, 2008. Vargas DL, Nascimbene C, Krishnan C, Zimmerman AW, Pardo CA. Neuroglial activation and neuroinflammation in the brain of patients with autism. ls of Neurology. 2005 Feb; 57(2):304. - J, Thomson M, Wakefield AJ, O'Leary JJ. Potential viral pathogenic mechanism for new variant inflammatory bowel disease. Molecular Pathology. 2002 Apr;55(2):84-90. Retrieved August 25, 2008, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11950955?ordinalpos=14 & itool=EntrezSystem2.PE\ ntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum. Wakefield AJ, Ashwood P, Limb K, A. The significance of ileo-colonic lymphoid nodular hyperplasia in children with autistic spectrum disorder. European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2005: 17. Retrieved August 25, 2008, http://www.thoughtfulhouse.org/pub_06.htm. .. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.