Another view of NAIS (from a newsletter/website I subscribe to)

[Guest guest]

Here's a view of NAIS from a different angle, it was in a newsletter subscribed

to from this website:

http://www.grasslandbeef.com/StoreFront.bok

http://www.grasslandbeef.com/Page.bok?template=newsletter_archive.html

================================================================================\

==============================================

IS LITERAL SLAVERY A CIVIL RIGHTS ISSUE?

By a worried human being - Linn Cohen-Cole, February 26, 2009. Source: Food

Freedom Blog

What is apparent is the depth of farmers' desperation about it. Repeatedly, I

hear them talk about loss of freedom.

I've taken " loss of freedom " as an expression of outrage at the bureaucratizing

of farming, or a way of talking about huge governmental overreach, or as use of

conservative or libertarian language to describe loss of personal or democratic

or constitutional rights. Symbolic speech, poetic speech. But somewhere in the

midst of trying to explain to someone how much was at stake and why farmers

refuse to compromise because it would be acceding to something that can't in any

way be acceded to, something clicked.

I was in the midst of trying to convey why the effort to stop the bills in

Congress now (and still coming) must be centrally focused on farmers themselves

and not on other people's food, when I found myself saying (in essence):

In the simplest terms, the bills enslave farmers to an industrial system (having

to do its bidding or face penalties and prison so severe they function as whips)

that will demand purchase and application of petrochemicals and drugs, rendering

the farmers not only slaves but paying slaves (or else giving up) and the land

and animals poisoned and/or genetically engineered.

Given that a hidden form of enslavement is at stake, it's reasonable for farmers

to look for reassurance that no accidental acceptance of any portion of those

bills will happen.

It was only after writing it that I was jerked up by my own words and suddenly

experienced them as neither symbolic nor hyperbole. It struck me then that we

are in fact looking at a new form of slavery.

I have always assumed that slavery was an historic event which we have rejected

now morally and have made changes in law to codify. I see our cultural

repulsion at continuing forms of slavery as a sign of civilization having

learned lessons about slavery and being committed now to stopping it wherever it

still exists (even if it is hard to do).

So, it was not easy to recognize that bills being introduced are an actual form

of enslavement of a whole class of people. A new form.

What other word would people use to describe controls imposed on people that

define work they must perform, down to the most extreme detail, or suffer

penalties as high as $500,000 and ten years in prison for mere infractions?

I've been writing variations on those words for sometime. Why did it take so

long for the light to dawn? NAIS is more than bad, it is more than terrible, it

is more than insane - it is astoundingly immoral. It is slavery.

And along with NAIS come " best farming practices " which would force a person on

their own land (though it is not clear that the land is not being stolen away,

too ) to feed their own animals what the government determined, to treat them

medically as the government determines, to spray the land as and when and with

what the government determines. And animals are not supposed to be on the same

farm as crops.

For anyone who knows the least thing about farming and the wholeness of it and

the value of manure and the help chickens give in eating bugs in a vegetable

garden, or goats give as they eat back ivy, or pigs naturally give as turn over

soil that can used for planting, the wrench of such utter nonsense is extreme.

But for a farmer to be commanded to do the very things that would destroy his

farm - a place he knows intimately, the workings of which he lives moment to

moment in sensitivity to his animals and crops, the lifetime of learning from

those who know and from his own experience of each particular - is why this is

slavery.

Perhaps if it were only applied to one aspect of someone's life, it might be

called tyranny, but because what is being proposed comes down on farmers where

they live and on what they do and on all they own and on what defines them as

people, it is deeper than " mere " tyranny. It is theft of all meaning and

reduction to operating against one's will, against one's knowledge, against

one's land, against one's animals, against one's needs, against one's being.

And within this enslavement by which the farmer is mandated to perform tasks

that undo all animal husbandry and all needs of the soil and plants, he is also

required to purchase inputs (feed, drugs, sprays ... and likely GMO seeds will

be chosen as well) so he is not only a slave but forced to pay the ones who

enslaved him, for products he specifically would avoid.

We are used to seeing things in a familiar shape - slavery as a black man in

chains, imperialism as foreigners on someone else's soil and ruling by guns and

fiat. So, it is easy to be fooled that what is happening in agriculture is no

relation to this but even progress. But today, globalization is a new kind of

master with immense power. Its " plantations " are decentralized small farms

scattered around the world and its involuntary " taxes " are levied through forced

repurchase of seeds and biotech contract agreements and its plantation managers

are lawyers with briefcases and its agents are thugs who spy on farmers and

rough them up or the state itself which keeps them in line not through whips but

through demanding they record their every move on computers and punishes and

breaks and even kills them with prison or debt.

Shall we strip away our familiar templates and recognize that their " food

safety " bills are the strangest lies because we are looking at multinational

corporations as true totalitarian masters actually setting up to take over the

land from farmers and control them as thoroughly as slaves were ever controlled,

threatening their lives and all they hold dear if they do not obey. But it has

been such a slick thing how these masters present themselves - in boardrooms,

with our politicians, running our agencies, in our courts, in science

laboratories - that we miss the brutal, ugly, cruel, immoral reality.

Website Source (see July 12, 2009 newsletter)

http://www.grasslandbeef.com/Page.bok?template=newsletter_archive.html

================================================================================\

==============================================

The NAIS issue was muddy to me, but Linn Cohen-Cole clarified it for me. I

hope someone else finds this article enlightening too.

Best Wishes,