an oldie but a goodie

[Guest guest]

The Dream & Lie of Louis Pasteur originally Pasteur ; Plagiarist, Imposter

by R. B. Pearson 1942

whole book is free to read on-line at the link below

PREFACEHYPERLINK \l "1. PRIOR HISTORY OF THE "GERM THEORY"1. PRIOR HISTORY OF THE "GERM THEORY"2 BECHAMP, PASTEUR, AND FERMENTATION3 VINOUS FERMENTATION4 BECHAMP'S MICROZYMAS OR `LITTLE BODIES'5 SILK WORM DISEASE: ANOTHER STEAL!6 PASTEUR ALSO A FAKER: ANTISEPSIS7 ARE BIOLOGICALS INJURIOUS?TUBERCULIN A FRAUDIMMUNITY IN ANIMALS VACCINATED WITH B.C.G. BIOLOGICALS MAY DISSOLVE THE RED BLOOD CORPUSCLES GERMS IN SERUMS MAY ATTACK THE HEART VALVES 8 ANIMAL SEROLOGY: ANTHRAXFOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE RABIES OR HYDROPHOBIA PASTEUR'S TREATMENT CAUSES RABIES THE TUBERCULIN TEST 9 REAL IMMUNITY

[NB: See dispute about quotes.]

PREFACE

It is a rather serious matter to attack the reputation of a famous man, one who has posed and been accepted as one of the world's greatest scientists. For many years, Pasteur has been looked upon as a founder and leader in serology; but it is always pertinent to look into the beginnings of any subject on which there is a difference of opinion, with the hope of finding the truth in the matter.

The writer has made an effort in his prior books and pamphlets to show that the germ theory is false, and that illness was practically always due to errors of diet or manner of living, the germs being present solely as scavengers of dead and waste tissues and foods, and not as the cause of the disease.

However, the erroneous belief that germs cause disease and must be controlled or eliminated before it can be cured is so widespread as to close the minds of many people to any other ideas on this subject.

For this reason it seems that a thorough investigation of this idea, the grounds on which it is based, and even the bona-fides of those who started it on its way, is necessary before any sane ideas as to the proper treatment of disease can be widely promulgated.

When Miss Ethel Hume brought out Bechamp or Pasteur? in 1923, it appeared to be just the thing that would fill this gap and end the use of serums and other biologicals forever. But it is now 19 years since that book, which should have marked an epoch in the healing arts, appeared. It did not receive the attention it deserved in medical circles and, though it is now in its second edition,* the medical profession are pushing biologicals harder than ever.

Hence it seems appropriate to go over the subject in order to show the truth regarding the falsity of Pasteur's ideas and claims to fame, and the fraudulent basis on which the germ theory rests, as was so well shown by Miss Hume in B«champ or Pasteur?, and to add other facts and statistics that support the idea that the germ theory is false, in the hopes that it may receive wider circulation and more general attention, and possibly lead to a complete overhauling of the question of the treatment of disease, especially regarding serology.

The translations from the French, and other material in chapters 2, 3, 4 and 5 not otherwise credited, are from Beauchamp or Pasteur? by Ethel Hume.

In closing, I wish to acknowledge my indebtedness to the Reverend and Mrs Wilber Atchison of Chicago for many suggestions and valuable assistance in the preparation of the manuscript. Miss L. Loat, secretary of the National Anti-Vaccination League of London, has also been very kind, responding to every request for information with more than could be used, some of it being especially compiled at the cost of considerable effort.

R. B. PearsonJanuary 15th, 1942

http://www.whale.to/a/b/pearson.html