Re: Please post if you can on the Telegraph boards...

[Guest guest]

I understand this comment has now been removed, made me feel sick when I read the mail Margaret, sorry you were abused in this way

As it stands, your son will always be a drain on the British taxpayer. You may not like to hear this, but it is true. You, at this moment, probably receive taxpayer money because of his disability. When you can no longer take care of him because of death, illness or old age, he will have to be moved into a taxpayer-funded facility.Given all this, why should British taxpayers have to pay for your son's education? Your son will never ever be able to repay all the money lavished on him. He will never be able to hold a job. He will never be able to contribute to his community except in 'special' taxpayer-funded projects that make 'allowances' for his disability.It's people like you, people who want the taxpayer to pay for their problems, that promotes the growth of the nanny state. I say that if you want your son to be educated - whatever good it will do anyone - then fine, pay for it yourself."

[Guest guest]

It's okay. I wasm't too upset, - was more bothered by the people who recommended

this post- but it's because of attitudes like this I think the Inclusion

movement is so important.

Margaret

>

> I understand this comment has now been removed, made me feel sick when I

> read the mail Margaret, sorry you were abused in this way

>

>

> In a message dated 14/11/2010 15:06:28 GMT Standard Time,

> m.collins9@... writes:

>

> As it stands, your son will always be a drain on the British taxpayer. You

> may not like to hear this, but it is true. You, at this moment, probably

> receive taxpayer money because of his disability. When you can no longer

> take care of him because of death, illness or old age, he will have to be

> moved into a taxpayer-funded facility.

>

> Given all this, why should British taxpayers have to pay for your son's

> education? Your son will never ever be able to repay all the money lavished

> on him. He will never be able to hold a job. He will never be able to

> contribute to his community except in 'special' taxpayer-funded projects that

> make 'allowances' for his disability.

>

> It's people like you, people who want the taxpayer to pay for their

> problems, that promotes the growth of the nanny state. I say that if you want

> your son to be educated - whatever good it will do anyone - then fine, pay

for

> it yourself. "

>

[Guest guest]

It's okay. I wasm't too upset, - was more bothered by the people who recommended

this post- but it's because of attitudes like this I think the Inclusion

movement is so important.

Margaret

>

> I understand this comment has now been removed, made me feel sick when I

> read the mail Margaret, sorry you were abused in this way

>

>

> In a message dated 14/11/2010 15:06:28 GMT Standard Time,

> m.collins9@... writes:

>

> As it stands, your son will always be a drain on the British taxpayer. You

> may not like to hear this, but it is true. You, at this moment, probably

> receive taxpayer money because of his disability. When you can no longer

> take care of him because of death, illness or old age, he will have to be

> moved into a taxpayer-funded facility.

>

> Given all this, why should British taxpayers have to pay for your son's

> education? Your son will never ever be able to repay all the money lavished

> on him. He will never be able to hold a job. He will never be able to

> contribute to his community except in 'special' taxpayer-funded projects that

> make 'allowances' for his disability.

>

> It's people like you, people who want the taxpayer to pay for their

> problems, that promotes the growth of the nanny state. I say that if you want

> your son to be educated - whatever good it will do anyone - then fine, pay

for

> it yourself. "

>

[Guest guest]

It's okay. I wasm't too upset, - was more bothered by the people who recommended

this post- but it's because of attitudes like this I think the Inclusion

movement is so important.

Margaret

>

> I understand this comment has now been removed, made me feel sick when I

> read the mail Margaret, sorry you were abused in this way

>

>

> In a message dated 14/11/2010 15:06:28 GMT Standard Time,

> m.collins9@... writes:

>

> As it stands, your son will always be a drain on the British taxpayer. You

> may not like to hear this, but it is true. You, at this moment, probably

> receive taxpayer money because of his disability. When you can no longer

> take care of him because of death, illness or old age, he will have to be

> moved into a taxpayer-funded facility.

>

> Given all this, why should British taxpayers have to pay for your son's

> education? Your son will never ever be able to repay all the money lavished

> on him. He will never be able to hold a job. He will never be able to

> contribute to his community except in 'special' taxpayer-funded projects that

> make 'allowances' for his disability.

>

> It's people like you, people who want the taxpayer to pay for their

> problems, that promotes the growth of the nanny state. I say that if you want

> your son to be educated - whatever good it will do anyone - then fine, pay

for

> it yourself. "

>

[Guest guest]

That Telegraph post was NOT from a normal person. I would totally ignore it.Subject: Re: Please post if you can on the Telegraph boards...To: Autism-Biomedical-Europe Date: Wednesday, 17 November, 2010, 6:18

It's okay. I wasm't too upset, - was more bothered by the people who recommended this post- but it's because of attitudes like this I think the Inclusion movement is so important.

Margaret

>

> I understand this comment has now been removed, made me feel sick when I

> read the mail Margaret, sorry you were abused in this way

>

>

> In a message dated 14/11/2010 15:06:28 GMT Standard Time,

> m.collins9@... writes:

>

> As it stands, your son will always be a drain on the British taxpayer. You

> may not like to hear this, but it is true. You, at this moment, probably

> receive taxpayer money because of his disability. When you can no longer

> take care of him because of death, illness or old age, he will have to be

> moved into a taxpayer-funded facility.

>

> Given all this, why should British taxpayers have to pay for your son's

> education? Your son will never ever be able to repay all the money lavished

> on him. He will never be able to hold a job. He will never be able to

> contribute to his community except in 'special' taxpayer-funded projects that

> make 'allowances' for his disability.

>

> It's people like you, people who want the taxpayer to pay for their

> problems, that promotes the growth of the nanny state. I say that if you want

> your son to be educated - whatever good it will do anyone - then fine, pay for

> it yourself."

>

[Guest guest]

That Telegraph post was NOT from a normal person. I would totally ignore it.Subject: Re: Please post if you can on the Telegraph boards...To: Autism-Biomedical-Europe Date: Wednesday, 17 November, 2010, 6:18

It's okay. I wasm't too upset, - was more bothered by the people who recommended this post- but it's because of attitudes like this I think the Inclusion movement is so important.

Margaret

>

> I understand this comment has now been removed, made me feel sick when I

> read the mail Margaret, sorry you were abused in this way

>

>

> In a message dated 14/11/2010 15:06:28 GMT Standard Time,

> m.collins9@... writes:

>

> As it stands, your son will always be a drain on the British taxpayer. You

> may not like to hear this, but it is true. You, at this moment, probably

> receive taxpayer money because of his disability. When you can no longer

> take care of him because of death, illness or old age, he will have to be

> moved into a taxpayer-funded facility.

>

> Given all this, why should British taxpayers have to pay for your son's

> education? Your son will never ever be able to repay all the money lavished

> on him. He will never be able to hold a job. He will never be able to

> contribute to his community except in 'special' taxpayer-funded projects that

> make 'allowances' for his disability.

>

> It's people like you, people who want the taxpayer to pay for their

> problems, that promotes the growth of the nanny state. I say that if you want

> your son to be educated - whatever good it will do anyone - then fine, pay for

> it yourself."

>

[Guest guest]

That Telegraph post was NOT from a normal person. I would totally ignore it.Subject: Re: Please post if you can on the Telegraph boards...To: Autism-Biomedical-Europe Date: Wednesday, 17 November, 2010, 6:18

It's okay. I wasm't too upset, - was more bothered by the people who recommended this post- but it's because of attitudes like this I think the Inclusion movement is so important.

Margaret

>

> I understand this comment has now been removed, made me feel sick when I

> read the mail Margaret, sorry you were abused in this way

>

>

> In a message dated 14/11/2010 15:06:28 GMT Standard Time,

> m.collins9@... writes:

>

> As it stands, your son will always be a drain on the British taxpayer. You

> may not like to hear this, but it is true. You, at this moment, probably

> receive taxpayer money because of his disability. When you can no longer

> take care of him because of death, illness or old age, he will have to be

> moved into a taxpayer-funded facility.

>

> Given all this, why should British taxpayers have to pay for your son's

> education? Your son will never ever be able to repay all the money lavished

> on him. He will never be able to hold a job. He will never be able to

> contribute to his community except in 'special' taxpayer-funded projects that

> make 'allowances' for his disability.

>

> It's people like you, people who want the taxpayer to pay for their

> problems, that promotes the growth of the nanny state. I say that if you want

> your son to be educated - whatever good it will do anyone - then fine, pay for

> it yourself."

>

[Guest guest]

that post is clearly from someone who's not well!! not happy, poor sod!

> >

> > I understand this comment has now been removed, made me feel sick when I

> > read the mail Margaret, sorry you were abused in this way

> >

> >

> > In a message dated 14/11/2010 15:06:28 GMT Standard Time,

> > m.collins9@ writes:

> >

> > As it stands, your son will always be a drain on the British taxpayer. You

> > may not like to hear this, but it is true. You, at this moment, probably

> > receive taxpayer money because of his disability. When you can no longer

> > take care of him because of death, illness or old age, he will have to be

> > moved into a taxpayer-funded facility.

> >

> > Given all this, why should British taxpayers have to pay for your son's

> > education? Your son will never ever be able to repay all the money lavished

> > on him. He will never be able to hold a job. He will never be able to

> > contribute to his community except in 'special' taxpayer-funded projects

that

> > make 'allowances' for his disability.

> >

> > It's people like you, people who want the taxpayer to pay for their

> > problems, that promotes the growth of the nanny state. I say that if you

want

> > your son to be educated - whatever good it will do anyone - then fine, pay

for

> > it yourself. "

> >

>