Guest guest Posted October 21, 2006 Report Share Posted October 21, 2006 _Sci Total Environ._ (javascript:AL_get(this, 'jour', 'Sci Total Environ.') 2006 Oct 13; [Epub ahead of print] _Related Articles,_ (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?itool=pubmed_Abstract & db=pubmed & c\ md=Display & dopt =pubmed_pubmed & from_uid=17049968 & itool=ExternalSearch) _Links_ (javascript:PopUpMenu2_Set(Menu17049968) The effect of home characteristics on dust antigen concentrations and loads in homes. _Cho SH_ (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed & cmd=Search & itool=pubmed\ _Abstract & term= " Cho+SH " [Author]) , _Reponen T_ (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed & cmd=Search & itool=pubmed\ _Abstract & term= " Re ponen+T " [Author]) , _Bernstein DI_ (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed & cmd=Search & itool=pubmed\ _Abstract & term= " Bernstein+DI " [Author]) , _Olds R_ (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed & cmd=Search & itool=pubmed\ _Abstract & term= " Olds+R " [Author]) , _Levin L_ (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed & cmd=Search & itool=pubmed\ _Abstract & term= " Levi n+L " [Author]) , _Liu X_ (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed & cmd=Search & itool=pubmed\ _Abstract & term= " Liu+X " [Author]) , _ K_ (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed & cmd=Search & itool=pubmed\ _Abst ract & term= " +K " [Author]) , _Lemasters G_ (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed & cmd=Search & itool=pubmed\ _Abstract & term= " Lemasters+G " [A uthor]) . Department of Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0056, USA. On-site home visits, consisting of a home inspection, dust sampling, and questionnaires were conducted in 777 homes belonging to an ongoing birth cohort study in Cincinnati, Ohio. Various home characteristics were investigated, and antigen levels (concentrations [mug/g] and loadings [mug/m(2)]; IU for cockroach allergen) in floor dust samples collected in child's primary activity room were analyzed by ELISA. Monoclonal antibodies were used for the analysis of cat, house dust mite, and cockroach allergens, and polyclonal antibodies for Alternaria and dog antigens. The relationship between the antigen levels and home characteristics was investigated through a generalized multiple regression model. More than half of the homes experienced mold/water damage. Cats and dogs were present in 19.7% and 31.1% of homes, respectively. More than 90% of homes had either carpet or area rug covering their floors. Among 777 homes, 87-92% of homes had measurable amount of Alternaria, cat, and dog allergen/antigen in house dust, whereas only 38% and 14% of homes had measurable levels of house dust mite and cockroach, respectively. Alternaria antigen level in house dust was not associated with visual mold/water damage, which was suspected to be one of the sources for this antigen in homes. Instead, the antigen level was high in samples taken in fall and in homes having dogs implicating that Alternaria antigen appears to be transported from outdoors to indoors. A high level was also measured in homes using a dehumidifier (these homes have experienced excessive humidity) and in-home venting of clothes dryer, which might be associated with microclimate affecting mold growth and spore release. The allergen/antigen level (both concentration and loading) of cat, dog and cockroach was significantly associated with the number of cats and dogs, or the appearance of cockroaches, respectively. High level of house dust mite allergen was measured in bedrooms and in homes using dehumidifier and no central forced air heating system. Having indoor plants was shown to reduce allergen levels. Carpeted floor was found to hold larger amount of antigens than non-carpeted floor. Antigen loading demonstrated more consistent and larger numbers of associations with home characteristics compared to antigen concentration. This study encompassed a wide range of home characteristics and various antigen types. Our findings provide information on home characteristics that can be used for allergen avoidance and in planning future exposure assessment studies. 1. More than half of the homes experienced mold/water damage (How much more than " half " ?) 2. A high level was also measured in homes using a dehumidifier (these homes have experienced excessive humidity) (ALL of these homes have 'experience excessive humidity?) 3.. Alternaria antigen level in house dust was not associated with visual mold/water damage, (True, alternaria is not an indoor mold, even in water damaged buildings) 4. Monoclonal antibodies were used for the analysis of cat, house dust mite, and cockroach allergens, and polyclonal antibodies for Alternaria and dog antigens. (Ummmmm Were there any other antigens known to cause human reaction from homes that are known to have " experienced excessive humidity?) 5. Among 777 homes, 87-92% of homes had measurable amount of Alternaria, cat, and dog allergen/antigen in house dust, (But what percentage had elevated alternaria?) 6. Monoclonal antibodies were used for the analysis of cat, house dust mite, and cockroach allergens, and polyclonal antibodies for Alternaria and dog antigens. (So what. They 'studied' homes with excessive humidity where people were self reporting symptoms and concluded that Alternaria, cats, dogs, dust mites cause allergic reactions? Or no. What did they conclude? Can't tell) This flurry of alternaria studies is looking more and more like cigarette science to me. From the Big Tobacco RICO docs, attached. What you will see is the current President of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, Platts-Mills, was paid $590K thru Center for Indoor Air Research (Big Tobacco front org) to study cockroaches and dust mites. Implications are that this was to take the focus off of illnesses caused by second hand smoke. Know what Reference #1 is for the ACOEM Mold Statement? WR, Platts-Mills TAE. Aerobiology and Inhalant Allergens. In: Middleton E, Jr et al, eds. Allergy: Principles and Practice. St. Louis: Mosby Co.; 1998:367-403. Its a cockroach, dust mite study. This sudden flurry of alternaria research publications in conjunction with allergic reacions and the indoor environment, smacks of cigarette science methodology for the purpose of confusing what is known of illness brought on by microbial contamination within water damaged homes, schools and offices. Who is funding these studies? Sharon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.